The reason I'd personally rather not use the number of jobs is because a
site might be targeted by users with very long jobs and that doesn't
help while another might be targeted only by empty pilots that from the
accounting point of view are as good as normal jobs.
cheers
alessandra
On 04/04/2011 17:08, Alessandra Forti wrote:
> On 04/04/2011 16:54, Stephen Burke wrote:
>> Alessandra Forti [mailto:[log in to unmask]] said:
>>> Then Ewan and Chris point that the we should count the number of jobs
>>> going through and not the HS06 is fair.
>> I don't really see why either make a good metric for the site - it
>> implies that if your site isn't full you could boost your rating by
>> submitting lots of jobs that do nothing useful :)
>>
>> Stephen
> I assume none of us is a scoundrel :-)
> and we are trying to find a metric that expresses how best a site is
> performing.
>
> cheers
> alessandra
|