On 07/04/2011 11:20, Stephen Burke wrote:
> Alessandra Forti [mailto:[log in to unmask]] said:
>> It is an assumption that nobody else will use multi user
>> pilots schemes and we have no way to tell if they do it.
> I don't understand your point. You can certainly tell if someone else has a system that uses glexec because they will have to ask you to enable it. If someone is running MUPJs *without* using glexec then you may or may not be able to spot it, but the same goes for any violation of the security policies, and anyway I don't see how the existence or not of glexec makes any difference to that.
>
> Stephen
it makes glexec useless from the security point of view if you have to
agree with the users that they use it, actually give them access to it,
don't you see how circular is the argument?
|