Reply-To: | | [log in to unmask][log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Dear All, > > > > Recently , our group decided to switch from SMP5 and SPM8. In one of our > study analysis (pre and post), we couldn't get 2nd level analysis run. We > tracked down to a dimension problem. Subjects preprocessed using spm5 have a > dimension of 79x95x69 while spm8 processed subjects have a slightly > different dimension of 79x95x68. This seems to be trivial but spm checks > dimension consistency before any group analysis. I further tracked the > problem to codes in spm_write_cn.m. (see screenshot below) > > > > My question is, did SPM developers do this intentionally? Should I just > uncomment those three lines so I don’t have to deal with the dimension > issue. > > > > Anyone? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Tony > > ------------------------------ > IMPORTANT WARNING: This email (and any attachments) is only intended for > the use of the person or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain > information that is privileged and confidential. You, the recipient, are > obligated to maintain it in a safe, secure and confidential manner. > Unauthorized redisclosure or failure to maintain confidentiality may subject > you to federal and state penalties. If you are not the intended recipient, > please immediately notify us by return email, and delete this message from > your computer. >[log in to unmask] |