JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING  April 2011

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING April 2011

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Ace funding

From:

Sarah Cook <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Sarah Cook <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 20 Apr 2011 19:00:48 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (83 lines)

Dear CRUMB list members

As the UK frantically tries to get some work finished before the impending double Bank Holiday weekend (Easter+Royal Wedding+May Day) I write with an important update:

As you'll know many of us in the media arts / digital arts sector here in England were surprised that so many small arts organisations who have been active within the field of digital lost their funding in the recent Arts Council England "National Portfolio" decisions. A group of curators, artists and organisations met together in London on 11 April to discuss how we could respond to this turn of events in a positive fashion. The meeting was very fruitful, and very upbeat, and as a result of the conversations that took place, an open letter was drafted collaboratively.

The open letter, which addresses how we, as a sector, can raise the profile of digitally-engaged artistic practice is online here: http://www.coda2coda.net/

I'm hoping that as international curators and practitioners you'll be keen to read it, and if you're in broad agreement with the sentiments outlined in the letter, to sign it. (the website will send you an email to confirm your signature, so check your junk folder if you don't receive it).

As one of the writers who took a first stab at collating information for the letter, I think the positive thing is that we perhaps still have a chance to change how the upcoming 'digital innovation fund' might be distributed, and to query how creative practice sits within a digital economy. We hope that the letter is useful in other contexts as well, not just in relationship to the UK specific situation (we applaud much of the research and support the Arts Council has provided and will continue to provide through other initiatives alongside the 'portfolio').

I'll be in Oslo for May Day and participating in a discussion day about the future of the lab and media art funding in Europe - if you have particular points you'd like me to raise in the discussion there, I am happy to oblige.

And meantime, we've had a great day reviewing the paper proposals for Rewire, the Media Art Histories conference taking place in Liverpool in September, and I'm pleased to say there are good papers which present histories of exhibitions and media art organisations and festivals... so we have much to look forward to in terms of knowledge sharing about all this field has built.

In haste,
Sarah






On 5 Apr 2011, at 16:05, Gere, Charlie wrote:

> Having been, shamefully, rather silent for much of this discussion, I
> would like to propose some thoughts about the resistance to the digital
> that seems to be part of ACE's process of deciding who should get
> funded.
> 
> I think Pauline got it absolutely right when she pointed out how the
> digital is regarded as nothing more than 
> 
> <a new set of distribution and delivery mechanism> 
> 
> and how, as far as ACE is concerned 
> 
> <digital can now confidently be assumed to exist as a set of processes
> internal to organisations (who should have the expertise to develop a
> digital strategy, be that via Marketing or elsewhere), *and* that this
> more self-reflexive (and, I'd argue, historically sensitive) conception
> of it, can make way for a normalisation and integration of 'digital'
> tout court, across the cultural landscape - be that in and through
> e-commerce, geo-location and 'expanded reality', or audience
> development, or whatever>.
> 
> Pauline perfectly captures the continued belief in the idea of the
> 'media', in other words that the technologies and systems that are used
> to convey information are nothing but, or should be nothing but
> transparent conduits for that information. They are in the middle,
> 'media', between the source of that information and the recipient. This
> is at the core of the idea of media itself, and remains a central
> understanding of its meaning. 
> 
> Allied to this is a disavowal of technicity, or in other words a refusal
> to acknowledge the constitutive role played by technologies in the
> artefactuality of facts and information.
> 
> This is made more complex in the case of the digital in that it is not
> one medium/practice/area among others, but the increasingly invisible
> substrate of almost of all other media. 
> 
> It is perhaps only those who are, in Pauline's words 'more
> self-reflexive' and 'historically sensitive', who are in a position to
> understand that our media are not actually simply media, but complex
> artefacts, that, in Friedrich Kittler's words, 'determine our
> situation'.
> 
> In a situation where the digital is frequently touted as a kind of magic
> wand that will solve any number of social and cultural problems, it is
> easy to see why such self-reflexive, historically-sensitive thinking may
> not be popular.
> 
> Such thinking above all does not offer the kind of big society-friendly,
> impact-sensitive solutions that ACE need to be seen funding. It rather
> involves thinking critically and possibly antagonistically about our
> wholesale embrace of new media and the digital. Perhaps it's not
> surprising that the organisations that engage in such thinking are not
> being funded 
> 
> Charlie

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager