Dear all,
I just wonder, if this needs a broader audience than the UK, and should be
signed by others as well.
I feel that it is a quality management instrument for maternity care that is
well- established and acknwowledged in the UK ad works quite well in
achieving its aims, but has also been exemplaric for other countries. For
me, the fact funding has been stopped seems also a sign of the high priority
that maternity care has in current society..
Best wishes, and have a good day,
Ans
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: A forum for discussion on midwifery and reproductive health research.
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] Im Auftrag von Susan Fenwick
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 6. April 2011 20:57
An: [log in to unmask]
Betreff: Re: National reporting of Perinatal and Maternal mortality
Please include my name on any correspondence. I feel strongly that the
current system must be maintained.
Sue Fenwick
Midwife
On 18 Feb 2011, at 19:41, Deborah Caine wrote:
> I also echo Mary's comments and would be willing to put my name to any
correspondence.
>
> Deborah
>
> Stewart, Mary writes:
>> Dear Nicola Thank you so much for raising this important and worrying
development. I quite agree that we should all be concerned about the
potential loss of the current system for auditing maternal and perinatal
mortality: I think it is an aspect of health care of which the UK can be the
most proud. Do you think it would be appropriate to write an open letter of
concern to one or more of the national newspapers? I think it is important
that this situation is acknowledged as widely and publicly as possible. Very
best wishes Mary Mary Stewart
>> Consultant midwife
>> Room J334
>> Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
>> 369 Fulham Road
>> London SW10 9NH Tel: 07872 423085
>> ________________________________
>> From: A forum for discussion on midwifery and reproductive health
research. [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Miller,
Nicola
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 11:22 AM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: National reporting of Perinatal and Maternal mortality Dear list
members, I am writing to voice my concern about the current absence of a
national monitoring auditing system for perinatal and maternal mortality. In
January 2011 it was announced that CMACE (formerly CEMACH) had lost its bids
in the NPSA tendering process for both the maternal and newborn health
programme and the child health programme. CMACE held its final conference
series in March Saving Mothers' lives 2006-2008 to launch the 8th triennial
report into maternal death. The conferences were of a very high standard
and sold out to an international audience. We looked forward to a new system
to be launched by MBBRACE-UK by April 1st 2011; however, at the last moment,
we have been told by the NPSA that this plan has been changed.
>> https://www.npeu.ox.ac.uk/mbrrace-uk The National Patient Safety Agency
(NPSA), Department of Health in England and representatives from the
devolved administrations have agreed to discontinue the procurement process
for the Maternal and Newborn Health programme with immediate effect.... An
expert group will be established to determine the appropriate scope and plan
for the future of the Maternal and Newborn Health programme, ensuring it
meets anticipated requirements, delivers first class output and value for
money. In the interim maternity unit co-ordinators have been told to
continue collecting data and to hold it until the new systems are in place.
My concerns are threefold: * Firstly, that the results of a
tendering process can be so easily abandoned. That a group (MBRRACE-UK)
judged to have a better plan than the current internationally renowned
service provider (CMACE), can have that responsibility immediately revoked.
* Secondly, that this leaves a position where there is no
ongoing surveillance of the fundamental public health outcomes of perinatal
and maternal mortality. * Thirdly, that whilst we are told to
continue to collect data, the CMACE 2010 perinatal forms must be scarce by
now, the 2011 forms were revoked and the maternal mortality paperwork was
issued only on notification. All the CMACE paperwork has CMACE addresses on
it and this produces data protection issues as it increases the risk of data
being sent to now empty offices. In some regions there are data collection
services available to maternity units and there, data collection should
remain ongoing and secure. I understand that this information has been sent
to all maternity units and I am interested to learn what systems are being
put in place to ensure that this data is protected until a new system is
instated. Otherwise national denominators will be lost and a sustained
period of detailed reporting will be broken. With concern, Nicola Miller RM
PhD This email has been processed by SmoothZap -
www.smoothwall.net<http://www.smoothwall.net/>
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
[log in to unmask]: This e-mail is confidential and may well
also be legally privileged.
>> If you have received it in error, you are on notice of its status.
>> Please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message
from your system.
>> Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes,
>> or disclose its contents to any other person: to do so could be a breach
of confidence.
>> Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
>> except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of the
Trust.
>> Thank you for your co-operation. This footnote confirms that the message
has been swept for computer viruses by
>> McAfee VirusScan Enterprise Edition: whilst every care is taken to avoid
the transmission
>> of virus code; please ensure that you have up to date virus detection
software before opening
>> any E-mail messages or attachments. Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS
Foundation Trust
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ If
you have received this email in error please notify the originator of the
message. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
sender. Scanning of this message and addition of this footer is performed
>> by Websense Email Security software in conjunction with Mcafee virus
detection software.
|
