JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for FSL Archives


FSL Archives

FSL Archives


FSL@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

FSL Home

FSL Home

FSL  March 2011

FSL March 2011

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: GGMM

From:

Lorena Jimenez-Castro <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

FSL - FMRIB's Software Library <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 16 Mar 2011 20:05:29 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (93 lines)

Hello Eugene and FSL experts,

I am sorry that I insist but in the Filippini paper, specifically in the Materials and Methods section you can read the following:

Filippini et. al.
"(ii) using these time-course matrices in a linear model fit (temporal regression) against the associated fMRI data set to estimate subject-specific spatial maps. Finally, the different component maps are collected across subjects into single 4D files (1 per original ICA map, with the fourth dimension being subject identification) and tested voxel-wise for statistically significant differences between groups using nonparametric permutation testing (5,000 permutations) (55). This results in spatial maps characterizing the between-subject/group differences.

These maps were thresholded using an alternative hypothesis test based on fitting a Gaussian/gamma mixture model to the distribution of voxel intensities within spatial maps (see ref. 31 for further details) and controlling the local false-discovery rate at P < 0.05"

Now I am confused because after read that description my understanding is that after he used the dual regression analysis followed by randomise,   he thresholded the statistical maps from randomise using the gaussian/gamma mixture model. I believe that also since professor Christian F. Beckmann agreed with that in the post previously mentioned (https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin A2=ind1009&L=FSL&P=R17502&1=FSL&9=A&I=3&J=on&X=565E91456B012C3733&Y=lojicas%40yahoo.com&d=No+Match%3BMatch%3BMatches&z=4)

That is why I greatly appreciate if somebody would please help me with my previous questions or clarify this concern  to me 

Thank you so much in advance

Lorena 














From: Eugene Duff <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: [FSL] GGMM
To: [log in to unmask]
Date: Wednesday, March 16, 2011, 1:53 PM


Hi Lorena - 


On 16 March 2011 17:56, Lorena Jimenez <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Dear FSL experts,

 We ran MELODIC on our resting state data using multi-session temporal concatenation followed by dual regression analysis including randomise.
We had conducted an unpaired t-test in randomise comparing two groups (16 controls versus 16 patients).
 Contrasts:
1.000000e+00 -1.000000e+00
-1.000000e+00 1.000000e+00
1.000000e+00 0.000000e+00
0.000000e+00 1.000000e+00

Now we would like to threshold the statistics maps from randomise using Gaussian gamma mixture model as was done by Nicola Filippini  “Distinct patterns of brain activity in young carriers of the APOE-��4 allele”
I have being trying to figure out how to apply that threshold but I could not find a solution and the only one post that I found in the archives on this topic does not have answer for its last question. (https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=ind1009&L=FSL&P=R17502&1=FSL&9=A&I=3&J=on&X=565E91456B012C3733&Y=lojicas%40yahoo.com&d=No+Match%3BMatch%3BMatches&z=4)



There seems to be confusion on the method of thresholding used in that paper (it is unclear in the paper).  GGMM was NOT used to threshold the dual-regression results, only to represent the original IC maps (where thresholding is primarily for interpretation as these maps are not testing an experimental hypothesis).  Standard randomise voxelwise thresholding was used.  I don't think TFCE was used, but this is an option.  GGMM doesn't really make sense as a formal statistical test in this context.

Best,

Eugene

 
My guess is that I have to apply the following steps:

1) To convert the tstast maps from randomise to zmaps we can use the following commands righ?:

 fslmaths dr_stage3_ic00*_tstat1.nii.gz  -mul 0 -add 1 grot.nii
 ttoz grot.nii dr_stage3_ic00*_tstat1.nii.g  <dof>

Where DOFs are the number of the subjects included in the analysis minus the number of  explanatory variable (EVs) in my design, Is that right?


2) After that we would get the zstat1 map and I know I have apply GGMM using the second type of usage of melodic but I am not sure how to set up melodic. I was thinking we would run melodic as I described below:

melodic –i bg_image (dummy option)  --ICs=4d_zmaps_from_randomise_tstat1_or_tstat2 --mix=melodic_mix_33X32.txt (dummy mixing matrix) -o outputname -v --report –Ostats

If not, Could you please explain to me how to set up melodic?
 Do I have  to use a design matrix and a design contrast options in melodic, if so What are the designs and the "tstat images" (4d_zmaps_from_randomise: tstat1_and_tstat2 or tstat3 and Tstat4) that I have to use?


3) once when we have the zstat1 maps thresholded, Can we apply the following command?

fslmaths thresh_zstat1.nii -ztop pmap1.nii
obtaining  the uncorrected p images, which can be use as a input in FDR, right???


I know how valuable is your time, I really appreciate any hint on this


Thank you so much in advance

Lorena

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager