What you get in the MEG option when you select the SPM.mat file after
the prompt should be identical (in SPM5) to what you get when you
select the 'Classical' option in fMRI mode. Is this not the case?
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Linda Burns <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Dear Vladimir,
> thanks once again for your reply...the fact that there are no error messages is what triggered me to make this issue public in the first place...the procedure finished normally...i attach some screenshots of the two procedures. a general difference is that for the fmri estimation you get a promt in the graphics window about selecting the spm mat of the factorial design and choosing the desired estimation model (classical,bayesian). in the meg estimation a new window pops up that prompts for the spm map of the factorial design... in the attached file you can observe that more code is loaded for the fmri and therefore after the estimation it proceeds to the creation of the ess,conn spm images...it is this part that is different between the two procdures...so to sum it up there are no errors but no results as well using the meg option for no apparent reason..
> any thoughts?