JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING  March 2011

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING March 2011

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Analogue/Digital Art

From:

Simon Biggs <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Simon Biggs <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 3 Mar 2011 08:42:30 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (201 lines)

Thanks for the post Mat. So many issues to address...

I don't want to go into the debate concerning the relationship between
mainstream contemporary art and new media practice other than to observe
that artists can choose their domain in order to actively seek disconnects.
Their motivations can be highly varied but there will always be those who,
when they see their domain becoming mainstream, choose to move on before the
crowd arrives.

The lab-life activity you mention sounds very interesting. I assume you have
read Latour, Biagioli, Ingold and others on lab culture and will be aware
that there are many initiatives around the world, over the past few decades,
where artists have been able to work in lab environments for extended
periods, sometimes for years. Some of these activities have been studied and
written up.

Is your lab independent or is it part of a larger infrastructure? If it is
independent I would be curious to know how you sustain its activities. If it
is part of a larger organisation I would be equally interested to know how
you justify its existence to those who hold the purse strings.

What activities do you undertake in the lab? Do you work with scientists (of
various disciplines) or are you seeking to appropriate lab methods to
artistic activities? Or do you see the lab as something distinct from
scientific practices?

The crowd-sourcing dimension of what you are discussing is also of interest,
particularly as we are undertaking a research project that is looking at
some closely related areas (www.elmcip.net). I am sure you are aware of how
Furtherfield are setting up their activities as an open lab or studio,
extending from real space into network space. Are there connections with
your initiative or is what you are doing quite different?

Best

Simon


On 03/03/2011 00:45, "Mat Trivett" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hi All,
> 
> This is the first time for me posting on this list, so excuse my
> naivity.  I think for me the Laboratory Life project/exhibition/
> residency/laboratory/workshop/experiment is really interesting.
> Unfortunately I didn't get to make it down but friends and
> collaborators of mine did.  I feel that there is a disconnect between
> the realms of the digital and the analogue in the way that so called
> 'digital art' is viewed by institutions and funders and therefore
> framed to the viewer or audience.
> 
> I think a lot of artists and curators don't necessarily work with
> digital technologies but possibly more with the lexicon and protocol
> of digital technologies, the language of network culture as the basis
> for their work.  With laboratory life, this blurring of disciplines
> and egos relates in a way to the ways in which digital technologies
> are changing the ways of making.  Closer to our biology, closer to the
> language of the internet and of the media used to make work.
> 
> Last year during the premiere of the British Art Show in Nottingham
> (UK), I was involved in a similar project commissioned by Sideshow
> (the fringe to BAS7) titled LAB (as was the moniker under which we
> worked) http://wearelab.org/ it reflected a desire to borrow from
> hacking culture and open-source dynamics to explore new models of the
> 'making' you describe.  What might laboratory practice look like
> across a range of media?  How might a lab be different from a studio
> or a residency?  What does this collaborative process or online
> processes like the wiki look like in real world scenarios?  We are
> currently attempting to archive the various conversations, experiments
> and micro-projects that emerged from this messy process.
> 
> There have been various projects both individual and collaborative
> that formed as a result of this cataclysmic process.  What was called
> LAB is now called The Institute for Boundary Interactions  Andy I
> would really like to speak with you more about your practice and
> furthermore about Laboratory Life.
> 
> What space is there within 'digital art' structures for projects or
> artists who utilise this language of networks in the real world or
> across worlds?  What happens when the media is human and not digital
> at all but more about connecting things?  Connecting people, sharing
> knowledge and creating structures for sharing knowledge borrowing from
> the successes and failures of the 'many minds create knowledge' adage?
> 
> There is one question that I am really interested in, in my personal
> practice currently of how might we understand vernacular or heriditary
> knowledge in the connected world? So relating back to the topic...how
> might analogue knowledge be digitised or conversely how might digital
> knowledge (semiotics) be humanised?  How might 'networked' knowledge
> be generational?
> 
> Mathew 'Newbie' Trivett
> 
> 
> 
> On 2 Mar 2011, at 22:44, Ele wrote:
> 
>> Hi Andy,
>> This sounds a truly rich and exciting experience. The fluid and
>> improvised nature of the experimentation sounds like it really
>> worked too. It seems to reflect an integrated approach to making
>> using whatever materials necessary (reminds me of the art school
>> breaking down media specific art disciplines to just be Art). But
>> did the project also rely on some in-depth subject-specific
>> knowledge too?
>> 
>> But do feel free to put those rehearsed debates aside. Were there
>> over-arching lines of enquiry that emerged? Ideas, concepts,
>> critical frameworks that worked across the board?
>> 
>> I've just been to a talk by Boris Groys on the contemporary nature
>> of the contemporary art musuem based on the questions of time based
>> art similar to those discussed on this list over the last ten years
>> (the loop, the original, hot and cold media etc). And I was reminded
>> of McLuhans claim that every new media investigates the aesthetics
>> of it's preceding media (or something like that). Perhaps this can
>> be apparent in art exhibition making too. In that each generation of
>> curators adopts the curatorial critique of the artists before
>> them(?) Groys argued that the truly contemporary work emerges at the
>> point of exhibition. And your description of the provisional nature
>> of the 'workshop lab in public' or 'lab as exhibition' seems to keep
>> the contemporaneity of the work alive in a particularly strong way.
>> 
>> It would be interesting to hear of other examples of this involving
>> different kinds of making?
>> Best
>> Ele
>> 
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> On 2 Mar 2011, at 17:52, andy gracie <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> 
>>> hi all
>>> 
>>> I'm Andy Gracie, and i'm excited to be invited to join in with this
>>> discussion.
>>> 
>>> I'm just nearing the end of a thrilling two weeks in Brighton,
>>> where I was leading the 'laboratory life' project with Lighthouse
>>> and The Arts Catalyst. This project was based on the Interactivos
>>> model devised by Media-Lab Prado in Madrid and featured 5 lead
>>> artists whose practice engages with science, and 17 collaborators
>>> drawn from various artistic and scientific fields.
>>> 
>>> I think that the things that have been going on here reflect pretty
>>> much all of the themes that have been outlined for this discussion.
>>> We have had home made performative human centrifuges, challenging
>>> probes into the legality of our own bodies and those of the people
>>> being used as human test beds, dressmaking with micro-biological
>>> dyes, realtime scientific interpretations through automatic
>>> drawing, the construction of a functioning and operative sterile
>>> laboratory using items from hardware and gardening stores, and
>>> hacker/craft constructions of astrobiological simulators with
>>> custom bred fruit flies. The fact that all this was being carried
>>> out under the intense scrutiny of the public eye ensured that the
>>> performative and challenging aspects of each project were to the
>>> fore.
>>> 
>>> One of the beautiful qualities of all this inter-disciplinary,
>>> hybrid, analogue meets digital, craft meets bioart, function meets
>>> theatre process was that it was completely and utterly fluid and
>>> improvised. And all completely complimentary. I like to see it as
>>> evidence that it is when we decide to push the analysis of media
>>> and approach to one side we can really begin to let our hair down
>>> and generate ideas, projects and collaborations that produce
>>> results that are always fresh, always innovative and always thought
>>> provoking.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> best
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> andy
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ||||<web>|||||:::    hostprods dot net
>>> ||||<blog>|||||:::    hostdev dot wordpress dot com
>> 
> 
> Mat Trivett
> [log in to unmask]
> Mob: +447738879173
> Skype: mathewtrivett
> 
> http://trampoline.org.uk
> http://trampoline.org.uk/tracingmobility
> http://www.radiator-festival.org
> 


Simon Biggs
[log in to unmask]
http://www.littlepig.org.uk/

[log in to unmask]
http://www.elmcip.net/
http://www.eca.ac.uk/circle/

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager