JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING  March 2011

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING March 2011

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: The AHRC ordered to research "big society"

From:

Variant <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Variant <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 27 Mar 2011 14:58:34 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (277 lines)

It seems perfectly obvious that the AHRC has abandoned any sense of critical autonomy and is happy to take culture, commerce and community and wrap them up together in line with policy, for example:

Research Development Workshop on the Role of the Creative Economy in Developing and Sustaining Prosperous Communities in the UK, Birmingham  6-8th December - The AHRC are organising a workshop as part of the Connected Communities programme with the aim to build on existing research and bring together researchers and other experts from policy and practice communities to identify the key future research challenges and opportunities for understanding the role of the creative economy in developing and sustaining prosperous communities and inform future policy and practice.  After inviting a number of key contacts we are now accepting applications to attend the workshop.
http://www.ahrc.ac.uk/FundingOpportunities/Documents/creativeecoworkshopcall.pdf

> If one is paranoid then it would be possible to read all of the themes described above as government meddling in academic freedom. I have some
> sympathy with that view. But the government doesn't have that kind of reach into academia. The universities that run the UK academic system are mostly
> large and ancient institutions, slow moving strategic units and part of a global structure of such institutions.


As appalling as they are, a quick glance at this weekend's Scottish papers screams otherwise:

Machar says proposal to close course that inspired her ‘beggars belief
http://www.heraldscotland.com:80/news/home-news/machar-says-proposal-to-close-course-that-inspired-her-beggars-belief-1.1092880

Student sit-in after police eviction: celebrity visits, more protestors and an upgrade
http://www.heraldscotland.com:80/news/home-news/student-sit-in-after-police-eviction-celebrity-visits-more-protestors-and-an-upgrade-1.1092866

The Senate is the senior academic body of Glasgow University
http://www.heraldscotland.com:80/news/education/the-role-of-the-senate-1.1092282

University’s Senate calls for delay to course cuts
http://www.heraldscotland.com:80/news/education/university-s-senate-calls-for-delay-to-course-cuts-1.1092278

Lecturers call for inquiry into sit-in removal
http://www.heraldscotland.com:80/news/education/lecturers-call-for-inquiry-into-sit-in-removal-1.1092237

University to probe action against sit-in
http://www.heraldscotland.com:80/news/education/university-to-probe-action-against-sit-in-1.1092518

Lecturers strike as pensions dispute intensifies
http://www.heraldscotland.com:80/news/education/lecturers-strike-as-pensions-dispute-intensifies-1.1092523

Glasgow students call for principal to resign
http://www.heraldscotland.com:80/news/education/glasgow-students-call-for-principal-to-resign-1.1092780

Best wishes,
Leigh




On 27 Mar 2011, at 15:00, Simon Biggs wrote:

> I only read this article this morning, like everybody else, but it didn't
> seem like news. The AHRC has been engaging these issues for many months,
> even years.
> 
> Some of the current research agenda predates the last election whilst some
> has clearly been driven by new political realities. I am not an apologist
> for the AHRC's apparent subservience to its political masters but I think,
> mindful I may be trashed by some, the Observer piece is overstating things.
> 
> Firstly, the AHRC has not been discussing anything called the "big society".
> They would find the term hilarious, as we do. What it has been doing, like
> the other research councils, is responding to the impact agenda (initiated
> by the previous government) and recognising that the AHRC might make hay
> where some other knowledge domains could struggle. The arts, in particular,
> are traditionally very outward looking. In the arts audiences are at the
> centre of our thinking and exchange through the knowledge economy is innate.
> This is something that in other areas can seem abstract or even alien. The
> AHRC have recognised this and are explicitly pursuing these opportunities.
> It was not an accident that RCUK appointed the head of the AHRC to lead on
> the impact agenda. That was prior to the last election.
> 
> Secondly, there has been a relaxing, over the past year, in some of the more
> instrumentalist directives being passed down from the Department for
> Business, Innovation and Skills (responsible for HE and research). Mandleson
> was a micromanager who wished to stamp his own preferences across the
> sector, especially in research. Cable and Willetts are not much of a double
> act and have buckets of blood on their hands, but they are actually more
> hands off (although the bloodstains are showing).
> 
> Thirdly, we should look at what the AHRC is prioritising, rather than solely
> relying on the Observer for our information. The AHRC has four highlight
> themes which articulate their priorities and encourage the sort of research
> they want to see happening. These themes have been in the public domain for
> many months. This doesn't mean that other research isn't funded. Funding is
> decided by the Peer Review College and Peer Review Panels and these are
> composed of the same academics who are applying for the funds. They
> interpret the themes how they will, or choose to ignore them.
> 
> The themes include "Care for the Future". This is possibly the closest of
> the themes to the Big Society concept - except that if you visit the AHRC
> site http://www.ahrc.ac.uk you see this isn't what it's about but, rather,
> more conventional humanities research priorities such as conservation,
> interpretation and heritage. That said, terms such as "trust" and
> "philanthropy" appear in the texts. These could be seen to echo government
> ideology. However, this also relates to concepts such as "connected
> communities", which is a narrative with communitarian characteristics - not
> a direction the current government is likely to want to go in.
> 
> The second theme is "Digital Transformations", which seems a fantastic theme
> and directly relevant to many members on this list. This theme ranges from
> looking at how digital technology affects the way we do research and
> understand things through to how the digital is transforming the world with
> new communication systems and subsequent globalisation. Again, it allows
> both the epistemological and ontological dimensions of the social to be
> explored.
> 
> The third theme is "Translating Cultures" which, to some degree, is a
> hangover from the previous strategic focus of RCUK on internationalisation.
> That was driven, in part, by governmental concern over cultural conflict as
> evidenced, at its most extreme, in terrorist activity. From shortly after
> 9/11 the research councils have been engaging these themes as strategically
> important, as the governments of the day sought to understand what was going
> on. The rhetoric of the "War on Terror" is now history, it's primary
> evangelists gone from the world-stage. But the theme hangs on, morphing into
> a broader engagement with issues around globalisation and potential
> conflict. It needs to be unpacked.
> 
> The last theme is "Science in Culture". To some degree the discussion on
> CRUMB this month (as well as WDL) has been engaging this topic, seeking to
> apprehend how scientific thought and methods can be disruptive, reconciled
> or even exploited, in various humanistic intellectual domains. It could be
> interpreted as instrumentalist but equally, like the first theme, as
> engaging traditional concerns in the field, not out of scope of C.P. Snow's
> famous observations.
> 
> All of these themes engage what the AHRC is calling "Connected Communities"
> and, again, I would suggest that this is generally intended in a
> non-instrumental manner to mean an engagement with our collective and
> individual ontologies as we and the world are transformed. We are living,
> arguably, in a period of particularly rapid change, with tectonic shifts in
> economic and cultural power not seen for perhaps centuries (as power rapidly
> moves East). I understand all these themes within that framework.
> 
> If one is paranoid then it would be possible to read all of the themes
> described above as government meddling in academic freedom. I have some
> sympathy with that view. But the government doesn't have that kind of reach
> into academia. The universities that run the UK academic system are mostly
> large and ancient institutions, slow moving strategic units and part of a
> global structure of such institutions. The forces and agencies that act
> through this system are too complex for governments to have too greater
> affect, negative or otherwise. The various agendas of the research councils
> largely derive from this context, not from government diktat, regardless of
> what government might seek. Cable and Willetts would love to have the
> influence the Observer grants them.
> 
> Best
> 
> Simon
> 
> 
> On 27/03/2011 12:47, "Honor Harger" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> I don't want to derail the current discussion,
>> but today's news about the new priorities the UK
>> Government have set the Arts and Humanities
>> Research Council (AHRC) - who distribute research
>> funding within UK Universities -  does seem
>> rather pertinent to many on the list.
>> 
>> For those of you who haven't heard, the AHRC have
>> been asked to commit substantial research funds
>> into studying the Conservative-Liberal-Democrat
>> Government's flagship policy idea, "The Big
>> Society", in exchange for the ring-fencing of the
>> AHRC budget.
>> 
>> The Observer report on this story here: http://v.gd/haldane
>> 
>> "The Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC)
>> will spend a "significant" amount of its funding
>> on the prime minister's vision for the country,
>> after a government "clarification" of the Haldane
>> principle - a convention that for 90 years has
>> protected the right of academics to decide where
>> research funds should be spent. Under the revised
>> principle, research bodies must work to the
>> government's national objectives [...] It is
>> claimed the AHRC was told that research into the
>> "big society" was non-negotiable if it wished to
>> maintain its funding at £100m a year."
>> 
>> The erosion of the Haldane principle has stark
>> implications for everyone who is involved in, or
>> effected by, University research. If the Observer
>> report is accurate, this is, in my view,
>> transparently chilling, and it is no surprise
>> that several commentators, and academics, have
>> started darkly murmuring:
>> 
>> "Who controls the past", ran the Party slogan,
>> "controls the future: who controls the present
>> controls the past."
>> 
>> As many of you are in academia in the UK, and
>> some of you are in receipt of AHRC funding, I
>> wonder what your reaction to this is?  Have your
>> universities informed you of this news?  Have
>> their been any internal briefings?
>> 
>> I'd be very curios to know.
>> 
>> With all best wishes,
>> 
>> Honor Harger
>> 
>> PS.  On a lighter note, there's some lovely,
>> playful deconstructions of this very disturbing
>> development, on Twitter right now. For those of
>> you who have Twitter accounts, you might be
>> interested in following this hashtag:
>> #bigsocietyresearchproposals
>> 
>> Here's some of the recent gems:
>> 
>> '"A depraved taste for equality", de Tocqueville
>> and the founding principles of the Big Society'
>> 
>> "Big Society of the Spectacle: Guy Debord's
>> influence on policymakers, politicians, and the
>> public."
>> 
>> "The Lion, The Witch And The Wardrobe: The
>> Tragedy of Uncontrolled Immigration in Fantasy
>> Fiction
>> 
>> "The Notorious B.I.G. Society: the influence of
>> East Coast hip-hop culture on Conservative policy
>> (1992-2011)"
>> --
>> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
>> 
>> honor harger
>> 
>> present location: brighton, .uk
>> 
>> email: [log in to unmask]
>> sms: +44 7765834272
>> 
>> 
>> -> w o r k
>> director of lighthouse: http://www.lighthouse.org.uk
>> 
>> -> b l o g
>> particle decelerator: http://decelerator.blogspot.com/
>> 
>> - > b l a g
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/honorharger
>> 
>> -> l i s t e n
>> radio astronomy: http://www.radio-astronomy.net
>> 
>> -> w e b
>> bio: http://www.radioqualia.net/honor
>> 
> 
> 
> Simon Biggs
> [log in to unmask]
> http://www.littlepig.org.uk/
> 
> [log in to unmask]
> http://www.elmcip.net/
> http://www.eca.ac.uk/circle/


-------------------------------------------
Variant
...in-depth coverage in the context of
broader social, political & cultural issues.

1/2 189b Maryhill Road
Glasgow G20 7XJ

t. +44 (0)141 333 9522
e. [log in to unmask]
http://www.variant.org.uk

receive events info & online issues:
[log in to unmask]
-------------------------------------------

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager