JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for HERFORUM Archives


HERFORUM Archives

HERFORUM Archives


HERFORUM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

HERFORUM Home

HERFORUM Home

HERFORUM  March 2011

HERFORUM March 2011

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Greenbacks and listed buildings

From:

David Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Issues related to Historic Environment Records <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 25 Mar 2011 14:54:09 -0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (421 lines)

Pdfs and other digital copies are quite acceptable in English Law
All have signatures for and on behalf of which again is perfectly
acceptable in English Law.

David Evans
Historic Environment Record Officer
Planning and Environment
Planning, Transportation & Strategic Environment
PO Box 2081
The Council Offices, Castle Street
Thornbury
South Gloucestershire
BS35 9BP
Phone: 01454 863649
fax:       01454 864473
-----Original Message-----
From: Issues related to Historic Environment Records
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Chris Webster
Sent: 25 March 2011 14:42
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Greenbacks and listed buildings

We've also been having some consultation with EH over this -
particularly their (acting for the S of S) duties under the Planning
(Listed Building and Conservation Areas) Act.
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1990/9/section/2
 
This states clearly (s2) that the S o S must 'deposit' a copy of the
list entry or amendment 'certified by or on behalf of the S of S to be a
true copy' with the relevant local authority (county and district in 2
tier areas). EH have not been doing this, they've just been emailing out
copies to various organisations, but now we've drawn their attention to
this, they say that they will be retrospectively producing and sending
out certified copies. In Somerset County Council these certified copies
are retained by the legal department.
 
The duties of the local authorities are simpler - we only have to 'keep
available for public inspection free of charge at reasonable hours and
at a convenient place', 'copies' of the list entries deposited with the
authority.
 
Without changing the law, I don't see how thus system of 'deposition'
can be ignored.
 
--
Chris Webster
Somerset Historic Environment Record
Somerset County Council
Somerset Heritage Centre
Brunel Way
Taunton
TA2 6SH
 
01823 347434
 
Online HER at www.somerset.gov.uk/her

________________________________

From: Issues related to Historic Environment Records on behalf of
ELLIOTT, (Andrew) Keith
Sent: Fri 25/03/2011 14:16
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Greenbacks and listed buildings



Dear Helen and everyone else,

(Please excuse this long reply, but hopefully I've addressed all the
comments which have come in on this).

I would keep a copy of the greenbacks, the new and amended listings - at
the moment I'm also printing them off when the newest ones come in
adding them as priority cases for entry to the HER. (The occasional new
scheduling would take precedence if both came through at the same time).

For ease I'm keeping the listings up to date paper-wise - though I have
a digital folder of the other additional information, such as the maps,
advice reports and so on - to save creating an overall scanned new
greenback and adding the newest information each time as it comes in.

I agree with Vince that it is also easier in cases where there are
non-literate IT members of the public. If I had a member of the public
wanting to look at the record for a Listed Building - Helen there has
not been anyone specifically wanting to see these - I probably would go
to look out the relevant folder of greenbacks and the amendments from
doing a search. If non-IT literate someone would also be able to see
more easily what is in the immediate area which may need not, of course,
be in numerical order in the HER records or be appropriately GIS-tagged
as we do in Gloucestershire for these.

However to add to Vince's comment a bit further I treat the paper copy
as the main record and follow Gemma's line that the paper record is the
one to go with in the case of differences between Listed Buildings
Online and greenbacks. At the moment in Gloucestershire in specifically
adding/enhancing the coverage of the near 13000 Listed Buildings there
are a number of differences between Listed Buildings Online and the
greenbacks. In this case the priority ones which I have been in contact
with English Heritage are those that are incorrect on the website, such
as those delisted from South Gloucestershire and re-listed in
Gloucestershire though Listed Buildings Online still has them as
delisted in the main body of the text. (In this last case I had a
similar reply to the one that Julia has just posted, and had
acknowledgement of the information as incorrect).
 
Perhaps if we could have clarification on how information is being
migrated across to the new Heritage List?
Is this coming from the likes of Listed Buildings Online or the archive
behind that website? (which my correspondent have noted as the correct
in some of the problematic cases).

Sorry this is all rather long (but I hope helpful), 

Keith



A Keith Elliott

HER Assistant

Gloucestershire County Council Archaeology Service

Environment Directorate

Gloucestershire County Council

Shire Hall, Westgate Street, Gloucester, GL1 2TH

Tel - 01452 425705

Fax - 01452 425356

Email - [log in to unmask]
<http://www.gloucestershire.gov.uk/archaeology> 

Web - www.gloucestershire.gov.uk/archaeology

HER Enquiries -
http://www.gloucestershire.gov.uk/index.cfm?articleid=10032

 

Go to www.gloucestershire.gov.uk <http://www.gloucestershire.gov.uk/>
to find information on any County Council service. It couldn't be easier
to find information instantly and in some cases apply for services
online.

 

From: Issues related to Historic Environment Records
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David Evans
Sent: 25 March 2011 13:53
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Greenbacks and listed buildings

 

Could someone buy Vince a printer!

We tried to inform the occupier of a post box of its listing but it came
back address unknown! 

 

David Evans

Historic Environment Record Officer

Planning and Environment

Planning, Transportation & Strategic Environment

PO Box 2081

The Council Offices, Castle Street

Thornbury

South Gloucestershire

BS35 9BP

Phone: 01454 863649

fax:       01454 864473

________________________________

From: Issues related to Historic Environment Records
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Helen Wells (Archaeology)
Sent: 25 March 2011 13:43
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Greenbacks and listed buildings

 

Yes, I agree that not everyone can use a computer, but I'm not aware
that anyone has ever come in to consult the greenbacks...  Sometimes
people ask and I print the designation info on the HER out for them (and
post it or whatever), but I've never referred to the greenbacks.  

 

Do people get lots of visitors to read their greenbacks?

 

Helen Wells 
Historic Environment Record Officer 
Leicestershire County Council 
http://www.leics.gov.uk/archaeology

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Issues related to Historic Environment Records
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Vince Russett
Sent: 25 March 2011 13:37
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Greenbacks and listed buildings

	Hi Helen (and everyone)

	 

	We have the Listed Buildings data on our HER, too, but we do
keep the greenbacks up to date, because there's probably an issue with
ICT non-literacy with some members of the public - we all tend to assume
that the public can all read things on-line at the drop of a hat, but it
ain't necessarily so...

	 

	Vince

	 

	
________________________________


	From: Issues related to Historic Environment Records
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Helen Wells (Archaeology)
	Sent: 25 March 2011 13:34
	To: [log in to unmask]
	Subject: Greenbacks and listed buildings

	 

	Hello everyone,

	 

	I have a question too, if it's Friday question time!

	 

	As a local authority we have a statutory duty to update the
greenbacks with new/amended listings.  However, since we now have the
info on the HER and it's available direct from EH online via LBOnline,
are we still expected to look after greenbacks?  

	 

	As our historic buildings people disappear I suspect more and
more of these duties will fall to me.  I can print the things I receive
out and put them with the greenbacks - is this what we're expected to
do?  I have no idea.  The historic buildings people didn't seem entirely
clear either.

	 

	Sorry if this is becoming increasingly vague and rambly!

	 

	Helen Wells 
	Historic Environment Record Officer 
	Leicestershire County Council 
	http://www.leics.gov.uk/archaeology

	
________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________

	Leicestershire County Council - Council of the Year 2009

	
________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________

	This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient, any reading, printing, storage,
disclosure, copying or any other action taken in respect of this e-mail
is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended
recipient, please notify the sender immediately by using the reply
function and then permanently delete what you have received.

	Incoming and outgoing e-mail messages are routinely monitored
for compliance with Leicestershire County Council's policy on the use of
electronic communications. The contents of e-mails may have to be
disclosed to a request under the Data Protection Act 1998 and the
Freedom of Information Act 2000.

	The views expressed by the author may not necessarily reflect
the views or policies of the Leicestershire County Council.

	Attachments to e-mail messages may contain viruses that may
damage your system. Whilst Leicestershire County Council has taken every
reasonable precaution to minimise this risk, we cannot accept any
liability for any damage which you sustain as a result of these factors.
You are advised to carry out your own virus checks before opening any
attachment.

	 

	
________________________________


	Keeping in touch
	Do it online - visit our website at www.n-somerset.gov.uk
<http://www.n-somerset.gov.uk/> 
	Council Connect - for all streets, open spaces and environmental
protection enquiries call 01934 888 802 or email
[log in to unmask]
<mailto:[log in to unmask]> 
	Care Connect - for all adult social services enquiries call
01275 888 801 or email [log in to unmask]
<mailto:[log in to unmask]> 
	For all other enquiries call 01934 888 888 in office hours, or,
in an emergency, our out of hours service 01934 622 669.

	Privacy and confidentiality notice:
	The information contained in this email transmission is intended
by North Somerset Council for the use of the named individual or entity
to which it is directed and may contain information that is privileged
or otherwise confidential. If you have received this email transmission
in error, please delete it from your system without copying or
forwarding it, and notify the sender of the error by reply email. Any
views expressed within this message or any other associated files are
the views and expressions of the individual and not North Somerset
Council. 
	North Somerset Council takes all reasonable precautions to
ensure that no viruses are transmitted with any electronic
communications sent, however the council can accept no responsibility
for any loss or damage resulting directly or indirectly from the use of
this email or any contents or attachments.

_______________________________________________________________
 
South Gloucestershire Council - rated April 2009 under the Comprehensive
Performance Assessment a maximum '4 star' council by the Audit
Commission
_______________________________________________________________

This email and any files transmitted with it from South Gloucestershire 
Council are confidential and intended solely for the use of the
individual
or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in

error please notify the South Gloucestershire Council Postmaster at the
address below.

[log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________




_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _

Think before you print - only print this email if absolutely necessary.

This email and any attachments are strictly confidential and intended
for the addressee only.  
If you are not the named addressee you must not disclose, copy or take
any action in 
reliance of this transmission and you should notify us as soon as
possible.

This email and any attachments are believed to be free from viruses but
it is your 
responsibility to carry out all necessary virus checks and
Gloucestershire County Council 
accepts no liability in connection therewith. 	

This communication is intended solely for the person (s) or organisation
to whom it is addressed.  It may contain privileged
and confidential information and if you are not the intended recipient
(s), you must not copy, distribute or take any action
in reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error please
notify the sender and copy the message to
[log in to unmask]

Individuals are advised that by replying to, or sending an e-mail
message to Somerset County Council, you accept
that you have no explicit or implicit expectation of privacy.

In line with the Surveillance and Monitoring Policy, any e-mail messages
(and attachments) transmitted over the 
Council's network may be subject to scrutiny.

___________________________________________________________________________
 
South Gloucestershire Council – rated April 2009 under the Comprehensive
Performance Assessment a maximum ‘4 star’ council by the Audit Commission.
____________________________________________________________________________

This email and any files transmitted with it from South Gloucestershire 
Council are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in 
error please notify the South Gloucestershire Council Postmaster at the 
address below.

[log in to unmask]
_____________________________________________________________________________

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager