Weren't we going to ask that at least all the tools have at least a --si
switch? In particular
dpm-listspaces is the tool that creates most of the confusion. Although
it's probably also the only tool not developed by JP.
cheers
alessandra
On 11/03/2011 09:12, Wahid Bhimji wrote:
> I think dpm-qryconf is not planned to change
> (backward compatibility reason) .
> I can ask JP while I'm out here if we feel strongly that it should
>
> Wahid
>
> On 11 Mar 2011, at 10:10, Sam Skipsey wrote:
>
>> On 10 March 2011 18:05, Peter Gronbech<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>> This is the old problem of Tb vs TiB I think see
>>>
>>> Dpm-qryconf –si
>>>
>> It is, indeed, that old problem.
>> It does perplex me how long it seems to have taken for all the
>> relevant official tools to migrate to TiB...
>>
>> Sam
>>
>
|