Hi Santanu,
On 9 March 2011 12:28, Santanu Das <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi Sam,
>
> Why you think it's not working properly? In fact, that was my thinking in
> the first place, but we did some tests with other machines (even one with 6
> bonded channels) before and file transfers, accessing disk etc. were just
> fine, even though I get exactly the same traceroute result for all of the
> bonded machines.
>
Well, the traceroute looks odd to me - I don't get that effect for any
of my bonded machines (on their bonded interface - of course, the
non-bonded interface is also normal). The traceroute just completes
normally, with a single hop.
> Any idea what's going wrong?
>
Can you give us more details of your bonding configuration?
Sam
> -Santanu
>
>
> On 09/03/11 12:18, Sam Skipsey wrote:
>>
>> Channel-bonding is fine with DPM - we have a whole bunch of disk
>> servers with bonded 1Gig links in one of our server rooms.
>> On the other hand, it looks like your channel bonding isn't working
>> correctly, which is probably the problem.
>>
>> Sam
>>
>
>
|