JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CCP4BB Archives


CCP4BB Archives

CCP4BB Archives


CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CCP4BB Home

CCP4BB Home

CCP4BB  March 2011

CCP4BB March 2011

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: titering baculovirus ?

From:

"Bertrand, Jay Aaron [Nervianoms]" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Bertrand, Jay Aaron [Nervianoms]

Date:

Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:23:53 +0200

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (46 lines)

I checked with someone in our protein production group and got the following response:

We also stopped doing the virus titration with the plaque assay and instead are performing expression test with different concentration of virus from the 3rd amplification. But for some viruses we still have doubts concerning the amplification success, so we are now evaluating a new technology using qPCR with the following kit (http://oetltd.com/products/category/baculoquant/). So you might have a look and see if it could be useful for your group. We would also be curious to hear if anyone else has experience with this approach.

I hope this helps.
Jay

-----Original Message-----
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Nathaniel Clark
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 11:38 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] titering baculovirus ?

We don't have a problem getting them to stick to the plates in serum-free media, or in 5% FBS media.  The more challenging part is getting the plating density just right, too low and the plaques are too big, to high and they are too small.  Or if the cells dry out, or if your agarose overlay is too hot, etc...

However, we have actually stopped titering all together.  We find early stocks (from co-transfection, or plaque purification) are 'low', but after ~2 rounds of amplification in adherent culture of the 'low'
titer stock(using a large volume of low-titer virus in a t25 flask), we can add ~0.5 ml to a 30-100 ml shake flask of Sf9's (serum free
media) and get a high titer stock( ie. >10^8 pfu/ml).  From there we amplify with ~ 10 mls of virus in a 1 L shaker culture, and we have our large volume high-titer stock.  Sometimes we will incubate the cells in pure virus stock in a t25 flask for 1 hour, take the virus off, and add fresh media, as a way to rescue low-titer stocks.

If you are just trying to titer (not plaque-purify), you can just take 10 fold dilutions of your virus, and do several small scale infections
in 6 well plates, 10 ml shaker cultures, whatever you prefer.   At the
lowest virus concentration where you see a synchronous infection (judged by protein expression levels, or cell-diameter if you have a cell counter, or by viewing with a trained eye), you call that an MOI=1.  From there you know the number of cells in the plate, and the volume of virus you added, so you can calculate an effective titer.
Plaque assays are really difficult and slow, and if you are just trying to make protein, an effective titer is fine, the absolute number isn't that helpful, Nat

Nat Clark
Graduate Student
Garman Lab
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Dept.
UMass Amherst


On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Gloria Borgstahl <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi Guys,
> we are learning to work with Sf9 cells and Carol in my lab wanted me 
> to ask you the following question.  Many thanks for any help, G
>
> I need to titer a baculovirus stock in my suspension-adapted Sf9 
> cells.   I know that these can be encouraged to attach better to 
> tissue culture plastic if they have added FBS (about 10%), but am not 
> sure that they will not be migrating and hiding plaques.  Does anyone 
> have suggestions about how to keep them more firmly anchored during 
> the baculovirus titration, or about another cell line that we could use instead?


This message has been scanned for malware by Websense. www.websense.com

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager