On Tue, 8 Feb 2011, Tim Jenness wrote:
>> On Tue, 8 Feb 2011, Tim Jenness wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think we're in the position where we can switch BLT versions now. Just a single commit away... Any objections to this at the moment? It will mean some disruption with the inevitable requirement to fix up existing clones by hand a little.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Sounds great.
>>>
>>> What do you mean by fixing up by hand? Presumably the git rm on the
>>> blt directory will leave a stub around because the directory won't be
>>> empty but I assume that's not the problem. Why is it more than going
>>> into the wizeblt directory and typing bootstrap;configure;make ?
>>
>> You'll need to remove the old blt/blt directory by hand
>
>
> ok. But not removing it won't hurt anything will it? (unless some one
> does a git add on the directory that's left over).
I've removed the submodule, so it will be reported as an unknown file,
once the remove is complete anyway.
>> and rebuild the BLT component (wizeblt will replace blt/blt, we keep
>> the blt super component name for convenience). GAIA, Skycat and CCDPACK
>> will also need cleaning out and rebuilding from scratch. There is also
>> the debris from the installed BLT to remove (since we don't have
>> deinstall targets). There may be more to do as I've not tested this
>> part yet, sorting this process out is easier to do after a push.
>
> this is all fine. Push at will :-)
OK, probably do that tomorrow.
Cheers,
Peter.
|