Pairwise registration of brains this way makes perfect sense. This is
what was done for the evaluations of various registration algorithms
by Klein et al (as some collaborators objected to group-wise
On 24 February 2011 11:03, guillaume auzias <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I've not been able to find in the SPM list archives a clear answer to the
> following questions:
> Is there a minimum number of subjects required for the template creation
> using DARTEL?
> Does the registration of a pair of brains through a specifically created
> 2-brains template makes any sense?
> Thanks for any input,