JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for SIDNEY-SPENSER Archives


SIDNEY-SPENSER Archives

SIDNEY-SPENSER Archives


SIDNEY-SPENSER@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SIDNEY-SPENSER Home

SIDNEY-SPENSER Home

SIDNEY-SPENSER  February 2011

SIDNEY-SPENSER February 2011

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Ez of El / Goat of God

From:

Roger Kuin <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Sidney-Spenser Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 13 Feb 2011 23:38:25 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (337 lines)

Matthew (if I may),

This is very illuminating: thank you. Could it be that in the case of the sheep and the goats goats are picked to represent the obdurate simply because they are notoriously less tractable and have foul tempers? Whereas sheep may be stupid but do let themselves be herded by shepherds, apprentice shepherds, 12-year-old shepherd boys (I've seen one or two in the South of France where I live) and even intelligent dogs (domini canes)? Nobody, if I recall, condemns the goats for being goats. But a) as we keep having to tell Spenser students about characters in the FQ, they are not 'real' goats, they are images; and b) they are images of potentially valuable (if hairy) people -- ourselves, at times -- who are stubbornly obdurate towards God and His salvation. Nor, of course, are the sheep valued for being sheep: God does not fancy stupid herdables even if they give decent wool. The sheep are equally images for those -- ourselves, at better times -- who, without having more value than goats, are tractable to the far-sighted will of a loving shepherd. (Here, incidentally, not more than an hour or two from the Pyrenees, we eat sheep's-milk cheese and goat cheese with equal pleasure -- the latter occasionally with honey.) 

Roger 

 
On Feb 13, 2011, at 10:13 PM, Stallard, Matthew wrote:

Apologies in advance for this long-winded and meandering post. I do not think that a typological reading of Ez El as essentially "demonic" will hold. To do so is to bark up, so to speak, the wrong goat.
Both positive and negative readings of goats abound in the Old Testament, and a number of terms are used for goat. The most common expression for goat is “ez.”  Another Hebrew term for goat is sa’ir which literally means “hairy.” The male leader of a flock was designate ‘atudh which is typically rendered “he-goat.” This term was used of leaders or “goat-like leaders” I suppose at Isaiah 14:9 and Zechariah 10:3. The ordinary Greek word for goat is tra’gos as in Hebrews 9:12, 13. In Palestine, the dominant breed was and is capra hircus mambrica which is usually black but occasionally speckled. Goats were extremely valuable to the ancient Hebrews. The produced cheese, butter and milk, and its flesh was eaten (Genesis 27:9; Deuteronomy 14:4; Judges 6:19; 13:15; Luke 15:29). Goat’s hair was used for fabrics and tents and skins were used for tents and clothing (Numbers 31:20; Song of Solomon 1:5; Exodus 26:7; 35:26; Genesis 21:15; Hebrews 11:37). Goats were permitted as sacrificial animals under the Mosaic Law (Leviticus 1:10; 22:18, 19; 3:6, 12). The tresses of the Shulammite maiden were compared to the hair of goats (Song of Solomon 4:1; 6:5). The wife of a young man’s youth is compared to a goat at Proverbs 5:18, 19 (not recommended as a pick-up line).
Yes, it is true, that goats were not always presented in a positive light. At times, goats were used to describe those who opposed the people of Yahweh (Isaiah 34:6,7; Jeremiah 41:40; Ezekiel 34:17; Zechariah 10:3).
That said, “Ez El” can only be read as a messianic figure and not as a demonic figure. The etymology of Ez El or Azazel is highly disputed. The spelling of the Masoretic text suggests that it is a combination of the two roots meaning “goat” and “disappear” or “goat that disappears.” Many scholars, however, hold that there has been a transposition of consonants and that it should be rendered “strength of God.” The Vulgate translates the word as capro emissario (emissary goat or perhaps scapegoat) whereas the Septuagint uses the expression or kai klaron ena to apopompaio “the one carrying away evil.” Emphasis is put upon the goats being unblemished and sound before they ritualistically receive the sins of the people on atonement day (Leviticus 14-16). The two goats acted as one sin offering that carried away the sins of Israel. This seems entirely messianic and resonates with the writer of Hebrews who emphasized that Jesus’ offering of his human life as a sacrifice was more than that accomplished by “the blood of bulls and rams (Hebrews 10:4, 11,12). As scapegoat, he becomes the “carrier of our sicknesses,” the one “pierced for our transgression” (Isaiah 53:4, 5; Matthew 8:17; 1Peter 2:24). I just don’t see Ez El as the right contender.

The right goat, I believe, could be found in renderings of sa’ir in four specific instances: Leviticus 17:7; 2Chronicles 11:15; Isaiah 13:21; Isaiah 34:14. In the cases of Leviticus 17:7 and 2Chronicles 11:15, the context is connected with religious practices condemned by the Hebrews but practiced by the surrounding nations. The Septuagint renders the term here as “the senseless things” and the Vulgate as “the demons.” Modern translators have followed suit. Rotherham “demons,” Revised Standard, Jerusalem Bible. American Translation “satyrs”; and Koehler and Baumgartner’s Lexicon in Veteris Testamenti Libros and A Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament by Brown, Driver, and Briggs “goat shaped demon.”  Interestingly, the American Standard Version uses “he-goats.” For whatever reason, a goat was used to signify the worship of these other gods. Herodotus suggests that the Greek belief in Pan may have been influenced by Egyptian goat worship. The references in Isaiah are not as clear. Some modern translations even rendering them as “ostriches” “jackals,” or even “hyenas” (Moffatt and Revised Standard).

At any rate, I think that the sense of Matthew chapter 25’s goat negativity is better understood from these examples of hairy sa’ir than from Azazel.

Best,
Matthew
____________________________________
Matthew Stallard, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor of English
Ohio University
Department of English
302 Ellis Hall
Athens, OH 45701
[log in to unmask]
office: 740-593-2770
cell: 740-591-4273
my book webpage: http://www.mupress.org/contributorinfo.cfm?ContribID=561
my faculty webpage: http://www.english.ohiou.edu/directory/faculty_page/stallard/
________________________________________
From: Sidney-Spenser Discussion List [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of ANNE PRESCOTT [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2011 6:32 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Ez of El / Goat of God

Thanks--as always, you are a wonderful library all on your own. Anne.

On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:47 PM, James C. Nohrnberg <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
Sheep are a type of innocency; goats, unlike sheep, have horns, and are less tractable beasts--more unruly.  Could the goats possibly have been associated with demonic Azazel who receives the scapegoat sent into the wilderness with sins on its head (Leviticus 16: 8, 10): Heb. 'ez = the goat ("go away" = 'azal)?  Azazel (azaz, 'be strong' + el, 'god') is a fallen angel in Enoch 6:6, etc.  But I do not know if any one has suggested that the Day of Atonement, in Lev. 16, apocalyptically understood, as possibly being a source for the separation of the sheep from the goats (in Matt. 25:31ff.:  "But when the Son of Man comes in his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then he will sit on the throne of his glory. Before him all the nations will be gathered, and he will separate them one from another, as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats. He will set the sheep on his right hand, but the goats on the left.").  For, in the end (at Mt. 25:46), "These [presumably 'the goats' are meant] shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal." (Ordinarily sheep, goats, & bullocks, are all acceptable for sacrifice and sin-offerings.)  And I suppose there might possibly be a hint of the diselection of Esau, who is resembled to a goat by the goat-skins in which the flock-keeping Jacob more or less successfully impersonates him (his hairy twin).

On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 21:23:07 -0500
ANNE PRESCOTT <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
Roger reminds me of how much I do miss the old "Lamb's Tail" award at
Porlock. Indeed, I am sorrier and sorrier that I won't be at K'zoo and hence
Porlock  this year so as to hear a chorus of baa's and oinks. I do hope I
can quote some of all this for a talk at the RSA, though.
 One observation and one query. Observation: on several occasions I've
noticed that the modern print versions on EEBO for  some of the texts I've
been looking at for bits on sheep-hooks, scepters, and David, refer to those
intriguing opposites the sheep an "the groats." So God can divide the sheep
from the groats? Not really impressive, although I'd give many an an angel
or crown to see those groats. Query: does anyone know why in the Bible sheep
are good and goats are bad? Do lambs taste better than baby goats? Maybe
this is in Scripture and I just forget. I know you can herd goats--look at
Obama's paternal family. But why do goats go to the left and sheep go on
God's right hand. Nobody calls a religious figure the goat of God.
 Signed, Puzzled in New York.

On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Roger Kuin <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:

I hereby commission all the participants hitherto who dare appear at
Kalamazoo this year to produce this as a Porlock Event, and invite
nominations for its nomenclature. It could, and perhaps should, be annual,
after the manner of the Jan Williams and Kathleen Van Dorsten
divertimentos.
Excelsior!
Roger

On Feb 11, 2011, at 6:53 PM, Scott Lucas wrote:

Come to think of it, congregational psalm singing is about the only thing I
haven't seen as a plot device on *Shaun the Sheep *yet.  Helen, you and
Psalm Woman could write the script! It could all start on that ill-starred
day when the Farmer decides to bring home that new, rather opinionated flock
of sheep he bought while on a trip to Geneva.  Led by Shaun's heretofore
unknown northern cousin, the grim, grumpy Shaun Knox, the newcomers soon
have the "fur flying" in the pasture!

Shaun Knox could call the flock to the barn to offer a enlightening sermon,
holding up the behavior of the pigs as proof positive of the doctrine of
double predestination.
Later, the sheep could all stage a stirring debate over whether Shirley's
gaudy pelt (or "furplice," if you will) is an abomination before the Lord or
merely a matter indifferent.

Some slapstick could be introduced by having neighboring farmer Mr. Algrind
come for a visit, only to take a pratfall after getting hit on the head by a
seashell.

The kids will love it.

Scott

Scott C. Lucas
Professor of English
The Citadel
Charleston, SC 29409

[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>

On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Vincent, Helen <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:

Beth,
as long as they were baaing in the vernacular...
Helen


Helen Vincent
Senior Curator
Rare Book Collections

Tel: +44 (0) 131 623 3894
Fax: +44 (0) 131 623 3888
Email: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>

National Library of Scotland
George IV Bridge
Edinburgh
EH1 1EW
Scotland



------------------------------
*From:* Sidney-Spenser Discussion List [mailto:
[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>] *On Behalf Of *Quitslund, Beth
*Sent:* 10 February 2011 15:07

*To:* [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
*Subject:* Re: Psalm 23

No worries.

Though my dreams last night were haunted by ghostly choruses of plowboys,
baaing.


Beth Quitslund
Associate Professor

Department of English
Ellis Hall 348
Ohio University
Athens, OH  45701

phone: (740) 593-2829
FAX: (740) 593-2832

------------------------------
*From:* Sidney-Spenser Discussion List [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>] On
Behalf Of Coughlan, Pat (English) [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
*Sent:* Thursday, February 10, 2011 7:25 AM

*To:* [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
*Subject:* Re: Psalm 23

Dear Beth,


Oh please can we not have the full text of “I just wanna be…”?


PC

------------------------------

*From:* Sidney-Spenser Discussion List [mailto:
[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>] *On Behalf Of *Quitslund, Beth
*Sent:* 09 February 2011 18:54

*To:* [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
*Subject:* Re: Psalm 23




Helen, I think I'm going to have to put that on a t-shirt.


However, for the record, that version of Ps 23 isn't by Thomas Sternhold
(probably Thomas Norton), and was certainly not published in 1549.
(Secondary power: stunning fistblows of pedantry.)


The best version of Ps 23--sort of--that I've heard lately--is a song
beginning "I just wanna be a sheep (baa baa baa baa),"  and includes the
verse "Don't wanna be a goat (nope)." It's kind of catchy, actually....


Beth



Beth Quitslund
Associate Professor

Department of English
Ellis Hall 348
Ohio University
Athens, OH  45701

phone: (740) 593-2829
FAX: (740) 593-2832

------------------------------

*From:* Sidney-Spenser Discussion List [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>] On
Behalf Of Vincent, Helen [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
*Sent:* Wednesday, February 09, 2011 1:43 PM
*To:* [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
*Subject:* Psalm 23

Beth's post reminds me (because she is Psalm Woman*) that the Guardian's
Poem Of The Week is Psalm 23, in three early modern translations - King
James, Tyndale, and Sternhold. As ever, the responses to these texts from
outside the academy make interesting reading...



http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/booksblog/2011/feb/07/poem-of-the-week-psalm-23


Helen

*superpower: making ploughboys burst into song


Helen Vincent
Senior Curator
Rare Book Collections

Tel: +44 (0) 131 623 3894
Fax: +44 (0) 131 623 3888
Email: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>

National Library of Scotland
George IV Bridge
Edinburgh
EH1 1EW
Scotland



***********************************************************************

Visit the National Library of Scotland online at www.nls.uk<http://www.nls.uk>

***********************************************************************

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

This communication is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not
the intended

recipient, please notify the Information Systems Helpdesk on +44 131 623
3789 or

[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> and delete this e-mail. The statements and opinions
expressed in this

message are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of
the National

Library of Scotland. The National Library of Scotland is a registered
Scottish charity.

Scottish Charity No. SC011086. This message is subject to the Data
Protection Act 1998

and Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 and has been scanned by
Webroot.

***********************************************************************

Follow us on Twitter<http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?t=7xm86sdab.0.0.f9gw5rcab.0&p=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fnatlibscot&id=preview>for twice-weekly updates.


Become our fan<http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?t=7xm86sdab.0.0.f9gw5rcab.0&p=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fpages%2FEdinburgh%2FNational-Library-of-Scotland%2F14754995380&id=preview>on Facebook and keep up-to-date that way too.


[image: Facebook button]<http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?t=7xm86sdab.0.0.f9gw5rcab.0&p=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fpages%2FEdinburgh%2FNational-Library-of-Scotland%2F14754995380%3Fv%3Dwall&id=preview>[image:
Twitter button]<http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?t=7xm86sdab.0.0.f9gw5rcab.0&p=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fnatlibscot&id=preview>


***********************************************************************

Visit the National Library of Scotland online at www.nls.uk<http://www.nls.uk>

***********************************************************************

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

This communication is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not
the intended

recipient, please notify the Information Systems Helpdesk on +44 131 623
3789 or

[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> and delete this e-mail. The statements and opinions
expressed in this

message are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of
the National

Library of Scotland. The National Library of Scotland is a registered
Scottish charity.

Scottish Charity No. SC011086. This message is subject to the Data
Protection Act 1998

and Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 and has been scanned by
Webroot.

***********************************************************************

Follow us on Twitter<http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?t=7xm86sdab.0.0.f9gw5rcab.0&p=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fnatlibscot&id=preview>for twice-weekly updates.


Become our fan<http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?t=7xm86sdab.0.0.f9gw5rcab.0&p=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fpages%2FEdinburgh%2FNational-Library-of-Scotland%2F14754995380&id=preview>on Facebook and keep up-to-date that way too.


[image: Facebook button]<http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?t=7xm86sdab.0.0.f9gw5rcab.0&p=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fpages%2FEdinburgh%2FNational-Library-of-Scotland%2F14754995380%3Fv%3Dwall&id=preview> [image:
Twitter button]<http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?t=7xm86sdab.0.0.f9gw5rcab.0&p=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fnatlibscot&id=preview>




[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
James Nohrnberg
Dept. of English, Bryan Hall 219
Univ. of Virginia
P.O Box 400121
Charlottesville, VA 22904-4121

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager