JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Archives


CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Archives

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Archives


CRIT-GEOG-FORUM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Home

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Home

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM  February 2011

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM February 2011

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

FW: Wisconsin's Ties to Labor Fray as Its Economy Shifts

From:

Kendra Strauss <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Kendra Strauss <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 15:26:32 -0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (197 lines)

 Re: recent posts on solidarity and the protests in Wisconsin, the article
below articulates fraying solidarity at local and regional scales in the
state. It would be interesting to hear perspectives on this from those
involved at UW.

It is likely to be a harbinger of things to come in e.g. the UK, where the
government has already attempted to set the stage for retrenchment in public
sector pensions by contrasting 'gold-plated' schemes with dwindling (in
coverage and generosity, for all but top echelons of management) private
sector pensions.

Best, Kendra.

-----Original Message-----
From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: 22 February 2011 00:40
To: [log in to unmask]
Cc: [log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask];
[log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask];
[log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask];
[log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask];
[log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask];
[log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask];
[log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask];
[log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask];
[log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask];
[log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask];
[log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask];
[log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask];
[log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask]
Subject: Wisconsin's Ties to Labor Fray as Its Economy Shifts



Reprints
This copy is for your personal, noncommercial use only. You can order
presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or
customers here or use the "Reprints" tool that appears next to any article.
Visit www.nytreprints.com for samples and additional information.
Order a reprint of this article now.

February 21, 2011
Wisconsin's Ties to Labor Fray as Its Economy Shifts By A. G. SULZBERGER and
MONICA DAVEY JANESVILLE, Wis. - Rich Hahan worked at the General Motors
plant here until it closed about two years ago. He moved to Detroit to take
another G.M. job, while his wife and children stayed here, but then the
automaker cut more jobs. So Mr. Hahan, 50, found himself back in Janesville,
collecting unemployment for a time, and watching as the city's industrial
base seemed to crumble away.

Among the top five employers here are the county, the schools and the city.
And that was enough to make Mr. Hahan, a union man from a union town, an
unlikely supporter of Gov. Scott Walker's sweeping proposal to cut the
benefits and collective-bargaining rights of public workers in Wisconsin, a
plan that has set off a firestorm of debate and protests in the state
Capitol. He said he still believes in unions, but he thinks those in the
public sector lead to wasteful spending because of their lavish benefits and
endless negotiations.

"Something needs to be done," he said, "and quickly."

Across Wisconsin, residents like Mr. Hahan have fumed in recent years as
tens of thousands of manufacturing jobs have vanished, and as some of the
state's best-known corporations have pressured workers to accept benefit
cuts.

Wisconsin's financial problems are not as dire as those of many other
states. But a simmering resentment over those lost jobs and lost benefits in
private industry - combined with this state's history of highly polarized
politics - may explain why Wisconsin, once a pioneer in supporting organized
labor, has set off a controversial debate that is spreading to other states
over public workers, unions and budget woes.

There are deeply divided opinions and shifting allegiances over whether
unions are helping or hurting people who have been caught in the recent
economic squeeze. And union workers themselves, being pitted against one
another, are finding it hard to feel sympathy or offer solidarity, with
their own jobs lost, and their benefits and pensions cut back or cut off.

"Everyone else needs to pinch pennies and give more money to health
insurance companies and pay for their own retirement," said Cindy Kuehn, as
she left Jim and Judy's Food Market in Palmyra. "It's about time the buck
stops."

In Madison, the capital, which has become the focus of protests, many state
workers and students at the University of Wisconsin predictably oppose the
proposed cuts.

But away from Madison, many people said that public workers needed to share
in the sacrifice that their own families have been forced to make.

The effort to weaken bargaining rights for public-sector unions was
particularly divisive, with some people questioning the need to tackle such
a fundamental issue to solve the state's budget problems.

But more often the conversation turned to the proposals to increase public
workers' contributions to their pensions and health care, and on these
issues people said they were less sympathetic, and often grew flushed and
emotional telling stories of their own pay cuts and financial worries.

Here in Janesville, a city of about 60,000 people an hour's drive from
Madison, Crystal Watkins, a preschool teacher at a Lutheran church, said she
was paid less than public school teachers and got fewer benefits. "I don't
have any of that," she said. "But I'm there every day because I love the
kids."

In Palmyra, a small village bounded by farmland and forests, MaryKay Horter
remembered how her husband's Chevy dealership of 30 years had teetered on
the brink of closing after General Motors declared bankruptcy, which she
blamed on unions.

Ms. Horter said she was forced to work more hours as an occupational
therapist, but had not seen a raise or any retirement contributions from her
employer for the last two years. All told, her family's income has dropped
by about a third.

"I don't get to bargain in my job, either," she said.

And in nearby Whitewater, a scenic working-class city of 15,000 that is home
to a public university, Dave Bergman, the owner of a bar, was tending it
himself on Sunday. He has been forced to cut staff and work seven days a
week himself.

"There are a lot of people out of work right now that would take a job
without a union," Mr. Bergman said.

By some measures, Wisconsin, a state of 5.6 million people, has not suffered
as much as other Midwestern states in the recession, according to Abdur
Chowdhury, an economist at Marquette University.

Its unemployment rate, 7.5 percent in December, is lower than the nation's.
But a significant percentage of jobs lost in Wisconsin during the recession
were in manufacturing, and this is a state where the proportion of the work
force in manufacturing is among the nation's highest.

Meanwhile, some of the state's well-known companies - Harley-Davidson,
Kohler, Mercury Marine - have sought concessions from their workers in
recent months.

Already, this battle over public workers has changed the tone in a state
that prides itself on Midwestern civility. A growing number of homemade
bumper stickers are popping up with messages like "Fire Them - Democrats
Too."

Among the state's political leaders, the partisan gulf seems to have widened
further. Traditionally, the state is nearly evenly split between Republicans
and Democrats (along with a third group of independents) - making it a
perennial battleground in presidential elections, with margins of victory
that have sometimes come down to a matter of a few tenths of 1 percent.
Wisconsin is the state that gave birth to government unions in the 1950s,
but also to Joseph McCarthy, who railed against people he accused of being
Communists.

"The Republicans are really Republicans here, and the Democrats are really
Democrats, so the candidates who come out of primaries reflect that," said
Ken Goldstein, a political scientist from the University of Wisconsin.

Two years after the state elected President Obama by a wide margin, it
elected conservative Republicans - some of them supported by Tea Party
groups - to the state legislature, the United Senate and to the governor's
office in November.

The flip has emboldened Governor Walker, the new Republican governor who has
proposed the cuts to benefits and bargaining rights, arguing that he
desperately needs to bridge a state budget deficit expected to reach $3.6
billion for the coming two-year budget. It has outraged Democrats, who,
lacking votes, have resorted to procedural tactics. And it has left the
voices of moderates seemingly muted.

Union leaders have said they would accept the financial terms of Mr.
Walker's proposal. The more controversial provisions, though, would strip
public employees of collective-bargaining rights.

.

In Whitewater, Ben Penwell, a lawyer whose wife is a public employee, said
he saw no reason to strip away workers' bargaining rights if they had agreed
to benefit cuts.

"They're willing to do what's necessary fiscally without giving up rights in
the future," he said.

And Pat Wellnitz, working in his accounting office on Sunday, wondered why
such bargaining provisions were needed if the real problem was simply saving
money.

"That's pretty drastic even for a staunch Republican," he said.

But others suggested that unions had perhaps had outlived their usefulness.
Carrie Fox, who works at a billboard advertising company, said she hoped
that the battle would encourage other governors to rein in
public- and private-sector unions.

"I know there was a point for unions back in the day because people were
being abused," she said. "But now there's workers' rights; there's laws that
protect us."

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager