JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES Archives


CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES Archives

CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES Archives


CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES Home

CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES Home

CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES  February 2011

CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES February 2011

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Corporate Manslaughter Case Continues

From:

Adam Czarnecki <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Adam Czarnecki <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:01:34 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (28 lines)

Shocking sequence of events and story.

Adam

Contractor accused of breaking own safety rules
2 February, 2011 | By Jo Stimpson 
Health & Safety Executive (HSE) officials had warned a contractor in 2005 about the safety issue which caused the death of one of its employees in 2008, a court heard this week.
Failure to “enforce own rules”
Winchester Crown Court also heard that Cotswold Geotechnical Holdings (CGH) failed to enforce its own health and safety rules which were written by the company’s sole director Peter Eaton in 1992.
CGH is charged with unlawfully causing the death of 27-year-old junior geotechnical engineer Alexander Wright. It is the first company to be charged under the Corporate Manslaughter Act 2007. Firms found guilty face unlimited fines.
Wright died of traumatic asphyxia from the weight of heavy soil when the unsupported walls of a 3.8m deep trial pit collapsed as he stood in it collecting soil samples on 5 September 2008. The accident was at a site in Briscombe, Gloucestershire.
The prosecution’s opening statement this week centred on claims that the company routinely sent employees into unsupported trial pits over 1.2m deep.
It should have either acted to make all seven of the pits on site safe, or should have taken soil samples from the surface using a excavator bucket, said Mark Ellison QC, prosecuting.
Failure to follow standards
The court heard that in 2005 Eaton was contacted by the Health & Safety Executive (HSE) after a former CGH employee expressed concern about having worked in trial pits for CGH without appropriate training. Eaton told the HSE in May 2005 that he would use shoring for all trial pits in future, or make sure their sides were battered back, Ellison said.
CGH’s own health and safety manual said “timbering or other support must be used” in trial pits over 1.2m deep, and that such pits should not be entered by employees when alone on site. The court heard that no record was found of CGH training employees doing trial pit work. Of six former employees interviewed, only one had read the company’s health and safety manual.
Ellison cited British Standard BS6031: Code of practice for earthworks, which states that “supports should be provided for all trenches above 1.2m deep”. He also referred to BS5930: Code of practice for site investigations which states: “Entry by personnel into unsupported trial pits deeper than 1.2m is not allowed for health and safety reasons.”
He also referred to the ICE’s Specification for Ground Investigation which says trial pits deeper than 1.2m should be dug by machine and excavated material brought to the surface for testing outside the pit.
Finished work alone
The court heard that CGH regularly used trial pits for soil surveys. Under Eaton’s direction, the seven pits on the Briscombe site were dug to a width of 610mm and at depths ranging between 2.6m and 3.8m. Wright was 1.8m tall, and died in the deepest pit. A ladder just 2.8m in length was used to enter and exit all the pits, the court heard.
The court heard that the ground on site was generally “clay-type soils”, which could easily have been brought up in large lumps in an excavator bucket to be sampled.
The accident happened at the end of a working day, when Eaton had left Wright alone on site after excavator driver Greg Hunt had left three pits open. Eaton told Wright to “finish up” alone, the prosecution said. Ellison said Eaton told police investigators that by this he meant tidying up and paperwork, and did not intend for Wright to continue working in the pits.
The court heard that Eaton routinely entered deep trial pits, usually via a ladder. On the day of the accident, Eaton entered one pit by convincing Hunt to lower him down as he stood on the arm of the excavator, Ellison said.
British Standards “glib assertion”
Ellison told the court that Eaton had told investigators he was aware of British Standards regarding pits deeper than 1.2m, but said this was a “glib assertion” as shallower pits could be dangerous and deeper ones could be safe. Eaton said he made risk assessments on site mentally, but did not write them down.
The court heard that on the day of the accident, Wright told site owner Mark Clubb that because CGH was a small firm he could enter trial pits without them being shored up, but if it were a larger firm “like Mowlem” it would not be allowed. Wright worked directly under Eaton, and the company employed eight people at the time of the accident.
The Crown Prosecution Service last October dropped gross negligence manslaughter charges against Eaton as an individual as illness made him too unwell to be tried (NCE 14 October 2010). The trial was originally due to start in February 2010 but was delayed because of the illness. CGH denies that it unlawfully killed Wright.
The trial continues with the prosecution calling its witnesses this week, after which the defence will make its opening statement.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JISCMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
November 1999
July 1999


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager