JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CCP4BB Archives


CCP4BB Archives

CCP4BB Archives


CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CCP4BB Home

CCP4BB Home

CCP4BB  February 2011

CCP4BB February 2011

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Let's talk pseudotranslational symmetry (or maybe it's bad data).

From:

Jon Schuermann <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 16:08:41 -0600

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (113 lines)

Just to add to Phil and Eleanor's response...

I would NOT use Phaser for MR with PTS present. It doesn't handle it 
correctly yet, since the likelihood targets don't account for PTS. 
Others may be able to explain it better.

Its probably not C-centered (as Eleanor mentions) and you should try the 
other primitive cell options.

 From what I understand about seeing (or not) the strong/weak reflection 
behavior... it is proportional to the size of your off-origin Patterson 
peak so it is more difficult to see when the off-origin peak is small 
(26% in your case). Crystal orientation, I guess, could also be a reason 
for not visualizing it on the diffraction image, but it still should be 
apparent in the stats since Xtriage found it.

If it was me... If your off-origin peak was over 50% of the origin peak 
height AND after inspecting the Patterson map to see if it lies at 
z0.25, then you MIGHT be able to solve and refine the structure in 
C-centered orthorhombic cell. The advantage of this would be that you 
wouldn't be refining against a large portion of weak reflection data. In 
your case, however, since your weak reflections are not really that weak 
you shouldn't have too much of a problem refining.

Hope this helps.

Jon

-- 
Jonathan P. Schuermann, Ph. D.
Beamline Scientist
NE-CAT, Building 436E
Advanced Photon Source (APS)
Argonne National Laboratory
9700 South Cass Avenue
Argonne, IL 60439

email: [log in to unmask]
Tel: (630) 252-0682
Fax: (630) 252-0687




On 02/08/2011 11:49 AM, Francis E Reyes wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I have a case of a dataset that indexed, integrated, and scaled well 
> in P 21 21 21 (55.6410   81.6493  147.1294   90.0000   90.0000   
> 90.0000) . The data has an Mn(i/sd) of 2.1 at 3.5 A with a Rpim of 
> about 0.398 at the highest resolution shell (3.49-3.58).
>
> Analysis with phenix.xtriage warns of pseudotranslational symmetry 
> (26% of origin).
>
>
>   x      y      z            height   p-value(height)
> ( 0.500, 0.000, 0.233 ) :   26.344   (2.681e-03)
> ( 0.000, 0.338, 0.000 ) :    5.380   (8.476e-01)
>
>  If the observed pseudo translationals are crystallographic
>  the following spacegroups and unit cells are possible:
>
>  space group                operator         unit cell of reference 
> setting
>  C 2 2 21 (b-1/4,c-1/4,2*a)       x+1/2, y, z+1/4  (73.64, 55.47, 
> 81.46,  90.00, 90.00, 90.00)
>
> From what I've read about pseudo c-centering via pseudotranslational 
> symmetry, the problem exhibits itself with alternating weak and strong 
> reflections at low resolution, but become consistent at high 
> resolution. Inspection of the h+k parity groups via truncate does not 
> show this behavior .
>
> Despite the fact the data was collected at the anomalous peak, I do 
> not observe any anomalous signal (DelAnom correlation between 
> half-sets is 0.013 for all data).
>
> Using a reasonably complete model (>80%) I searched for two molecules 
> in the ASU in space group P 21 21 21 and obtained a solution at 
> TFZ=22.1 for two molecules related solely by a translation.  However 
> the electron density maps (after rigid body refinement) are not great 
> (or maybe my expectations are too high). I am encouraged by the fact 
> the density is weak for a region of the model which should have a 
> different conformation, while strong density is maintained for the 
> rest of the molecule.
>
> Is this the proper way to approach pseudotranslation (i.e. is there 
> any reason to believe that the solution obtained by MR is not the 
> correct solution?).
>
> Is the space group determined? (i.e. does the pseudo c-centering 
> affect pointless's ability to analyze the systematic absences?).
>
> Is the lack of a pattern of alternating weak/strong reflections normal 
> (would observing this behavior be dependent on the crystal orientation) ?
>
> any advice would be greatly appreciated! (especially from those who 
> have had a case like this before)
>
>
> F
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------
> Francis E. Reyes M.Sc.
> 215 UCB
> University of Colorado at Boulder
>
> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 67BA8D5D
>
> 8AE2 F2F4 90F7 9640 28BC  686F 78FD 6669 67BA 8D5D

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager