Hi Aditya,
actually, a p-value of 0.2 would not be accepted for a scientific publication, this is just a suggestion for visualising some "results" in the practicals of FSL, sorry for the confusion.
Unfortunately, a p-value of 0.05 is more stringent than one of 0.2 (i.e. a threshold of the corrp map in fslview at 0.95 instead of 0.8), so you don't have any significant result so far...
Hope this helps,
Gwenaelle
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Gwenaëlle Douaud, PhD
FMRIB Centre, University of Oxford
John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington OX3 9DU Oxford UK
Tel: +44 (0) 1865 222 523 Fax: +44 (0) 1865 222 717
www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~douaud
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--- En date de : Ven 7.1.11, Aditya Kumar Kasinadhuni <[log in to unmask]> a écrit :
> De: Aditya Kumar Kasinadhuni <[log in to unmask]>
> Objet: Re: [FSL] Error files in FSLVBM
> À: [log in to unmask]
> Date: Vendredi 7 janvier 2011, 17h39
> Oh..okay :-)...Thank you very much
> Gwenaelle. This has been worrying me from some time. I am
> new to this kind of stuff so I was not sure if I was doing
> things right. I do have a final clarification, I used a
> p-value of 0.2 in contrast to p=0.05, as suggested in the
> documentation as this might be a very small sample space, do
> you think if I changed that it would yield anything?
>
> Thank you.
>
|