On Jan 31, 2011, at 8:55 AM, Peter W. Draper wrote:
>>
>> Thanks. Sticking with a fork of blt2.x seems like a good plan.
>
> Since we're switching vendors it makes sense to start from clean sources,
> so maybe a new git repositort for BLT is required (wizeblt.git?). Agree?
> Want to create one?
Sounds reasonable. I'll import the source.
--
Tim Jenness
Joint Astronomy Centre
|