JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CRISIS-FORUM Archives


CRISIS-FORUM Archives

CRISIS-FORUM Archives


CRISIS-FORUM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CRISIS-FORUM Home

CRISIS-FORUM Home

CRISIS-FORUM  January 2011

CRISIS-FORUM January 2011

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Record warming isn't news

From:

Brian Orr <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Brian Orr <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:09:08 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (226 lines)

Alistair,

Maybe an answer is lying in the asymmetry between the position of the  
deniers
and the believers. (I'm ruling out of the equation the total  
mendacious, immoral
psychopaths who are only interested in their own self-aggrandisement:  
they're not
terribly typical members of the human race but that doesn't stop them  
being dangerous!)

Focusing on people with a reasonable moral sense, how would we feel if  
we found
that we had been taken in by an explanation of a phenomenon that was  
about a tenth as dangerous as
we now believe. i.e. we actually had a good 100 years to adjust our  
way of life before we were
in serious difficulty?

We'd feel pretty foolish and apologetic about making a nearly  
unnecessary fuss and
for costing the world's GNP a billion or two. (Looking at the world's  
stock markets at
present it doesn't look as doom and gloom is having much effect.) And  
then we'd get
on with our lives.

But what about the 'responsible' deniers. They, if proven wrong, would  
have to confess
to being party to delaying the chance of avoiding unimaginable  
catastrophe around the
globe. The natural reaction would be: "No, I cannot countenance that I  
am implicated in bringing
about the unthinkable."

Hence a line of attack from us might be "How would you feel about  
yourself if you found out that your
'picture of how things will work out' was very wrong? Might you start  
by asking yourself did
you give the evidence anything like enough consideration? Did you  
countenance taking
action that wouldn't have cost you much but at least gave partial  
credence that global
warming was actually happening and was man-made?

And perhaps above all "Was I far too determined to hang on to the  
beliefs I wanted to hang
on to, because that was by far the more comfortable option?

In a nut-shell, let's focus on asking deniers why they are so  
convinced? (and why they get
so angry when challenged?)

Brian

On 13 Jan 2011, at 22:19, Alastair McIntosh wrote:

> David ... just picked this up ... trapped in my spam box, otherwise  
> I'd have
> responded in my previous message.
>
> I have been struck recently by how quiet this forum has been. It's  
> not that
> there's not some interesting people on it or that, for a "crisis  
> forum",
> there's not interesting stuff to discuss.
>
> My sense is that a helluva lot of us are stuck as to what we can
> meaningfully say that doesn't just sound like the virtual equivalent  
> of
> speaking into the wastepaper bin. I've been working quite a bit  
> recently in
> writing stuff for a forthcoming Ashgrove book on human ecology about
> postmodernism, and it does seem to me that during the 20th C we've  
> seen a
> progressive drift away from grounding, at various levels - both  
> physical and
> psychological (I would add spiritual, but we can leave that aside  
> for now) -
> in reality.
>
> The people who form and moderate opinion are all living so  
> comfortably,
> relatively speaking, that they don't want to lift the lid. I had a
> disturbing exchange recently with a good friend of mine and his  
> wife. He's a
> serving army general. We expect to disagree, but not as much as  
> you'd think,
> on war. What really surprised me was how animated he became about  
> climate
> change, his wife too, playing out all the Christopher Brooker type of
> arguments and basically, a very intelligent scientifically literate  
> man just
> not wanting to know.
>
> My sense in both this exchange and others similar is that most  
> people can't
> face the contradiction of their lives. Festinger summed it all up in  
> the
> 1950s with his study of cults ("When Prophecy Fails") - and how, the  
> more
> that the cult failed the more the believers believed. You'll be  
> familiar
> with his whole cognitive dissonance theory that came out of that. My  
> sense
> is that we have to create space for people to live with their
> contradictions. The poet Alice Walker says, and I quote from memory,  
> "take
> the contradictions of your life/ to wrap around you like a shawl/ to  
> parry
> stones/ and keep you warm."
>
> If we can't do this with ourselves and others we force denial, and the
> problem with denial is that it's worse than hypocrisy because it blind
> people to truth. At least if you're not blinded to the truth you  
> have the
> possibility of getting your bearings.
>
> I'd better go ... my wife's just back and it's late ... but I'm  
> concerned
> about this stuckness - in the media, even, I sense, on this forum,  
> and I
> wonder if you or others have reflection on this, or is there nothing  
> else
> that can be done but to sit with heads in the sand? Is that where  
> we're at
> in the human condition?
>
> Alastair.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Discussion list for the Crisis Forum
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David Cromwell
> Sent: 13 January 2011 18:30
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Record warming isn't news
>
> Alastair asks of the BBC:
>
> " What is going on in their science journalism?"
>
> I'd remove the word "science" and just ask:
>
> "What is going on in their journalism?"
>
> Please forgive the plug, but see:
>
> http://www.medialens.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=93&Ite
> mid=51
>
> And it's not just the BBC. It's the Guardian, the Independent, C4  
> News and
> all the other news media we're supposed to regard as the most  
> responsible.
>
> David
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Discussion list for the Crisis Forum
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Alastair McIntosh
> Sent: 13 January 2011 18:20
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Record warming isn't news
>
> You beat me to it, Bob. I had been watching out and was about to  
> make the
> same observation. What makes it all the stranger is that early today  
> the BBC
> had as the lead item on its science website evidence of climate  
> change in
> rainfall in the English uplands -
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-12151866 They've since
> substituted a story about the Sun. Astonishing that they can miss  
> out that
> the last year was the world's warmest equal, and the world's wettest  
> ever.
> What is going on in their science journalism?
>
> A
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Discussion list for the Crisis Forum
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Bob Ward
> Sent: 13 January 2011 18:06
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Record warming isn't news
>
> Apart from a small brief at the bottom of page 25 of today's edition  
> of
> 'The Guardian', the UK media ignored the announcements yesterday by  
> both
> NASA and the US National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration that 2010
> was tied with 2005 as the warmest year on record.
>
> But it was picked up by the media in most of the rest of the world,  
> even
> in the United States, where 49 of the 50 states are currently under
> snow.
>
> So what's up with our media? I've had a whinge about it here:
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/jan/13/uk-media-ignore-climat
> e-change
>
>
> Bob Ward
>
> Policy and Communications Director
> Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment
> London School of Economics and Political Science
> Houghton Street
> London WC2A 2AE
>
> http://www.lse.ac.uk/grantham
>
> Tel. +44 (0) 20 7106 1236
> Mob. +44 (0) 7811 320346
>
>
> Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic
> communications disclaimer: http://lse.ac.uk/emailDisclaimer

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

September 2022
May 2018
January 2018
September 2016
May 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
September 2015
August 2015
May 2015
March 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
July 2004


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager