JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Archives


EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Archives

EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Archives


EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Home

EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Home

EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH  November 2010

EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH November 2010

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Number of clinical questions per encounter

From:

Paul Glasziou <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Paul Glasziou <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 21 Nov 2010 07:36:11 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (238 lines)

Dear Neal
I absolutely agree - the number of questions depends on those 3 things,
and in particular on the method used. I could imagine dozens of
questions detected if I re-watched a video of my own consultations. But
many would be trivial and not important to clinical decisions. So among
the many studies (as in Martin's review), the data from Sackett's
evidence cart rounds is particularly relevant. They found 2 questions
per 3 patients (98 searches for 166 patients), and the searches changed
1 in 3 clinical decisions. 
"Of the71 successful searches,37 (52%) confirmed their current or
tentative diagnostic ortreat-ment plans, 18 (25%) led to a new
diagnostic skill, an additional test, ora new management decision, and
16 (23%) corrected a previous clinical skill, diagnostictest selection,
or treatment decision."
Cheers
Paul Glasziou
Sackett DL, Straus SE. Finding and applying evidence during clinical
rounds: the "evidence cart". JAMA. 1998 Oct 21;280(15):1336-8. PMID
9794314

>>> Maskrey Neal  17/11/10 23:24 >>>
No Jeff, you're right. "The wide variation of average number of
questions generated by primary care physicians per consultation depended
upon the work setting, the definition of the question and the methods
used (self report, interview, observation)."

 

Coumou HCH, Meijman FJ.  How do primary care physicians seek answers to
clinical questions? A literature review.  Journal of the Medical Library
Association, 2006, 94(1), pp55-60.

 

Best wishes

Neal 

Neal Maskrey. National Prescribing Centre, Liverpool, UK.

________________________________

From: Evidence based health (EBH)
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jeff Harrison
Sent: 15 November 2010 22:22
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Number of clinical questions per encounter

 

Dear Martin

 

Thank you for posting this, it looks like an interesting paper.  I
hadn't come across it before so my questions are, I accept, based on
reading only the abstract (something an EBMer would never do).  I'm
somewhat surprised by how low the rate of questions per consultation is.
 I find it hard to believe only 1 in 5 consultations requires a question
to be asked and a decision to be made - if so what is everyone doing in
the other 4????  Should the finding in your study be interpreted as
clinical questions the physician believed they didn't know the answer to
already?  That is to say, something they had to look up or undertake
further research before making a decision.  Might this explain some of
the difference between your study (0.18) and those previously cited?

 

It appears to me that Phillipp's question is about how often a question
arises and your paper is about how often information is sought to answer
the questions that have arisen.  Then again, I may have mis-interpreted
one or both of you.

 

Jeff

 

 

 

 

From: Evidence based health (EBH)
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Dawes, Martin
Sent: Monday, 15 November 2010 4:53 p.m.
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Number of clinical questions per encounter

 

We found fewer

Martin

 


Display Settings:  


*                                 Abstract  


Send to:  


Ann Fam Med.   2007 Jul-Aug;5(4):345-52.


Information needs and information-seeking behavior of primary care
physicians.


González-González AI  , Dawes M  , Sánchez-Mateos J  , Riesgo-Fuertes R 
, Escortell-Mayor E  , Sanz-Cuesta T  , Hernández-Fernández T  .

Servicio Madrileño de la Salud, Madrid, Spain.
[log in to unmask]


Abstract


PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the information needs of
primary care physicians in Spain and to describe their
information-seeking patterns.

METHODS: This observational study took place in primary care practices
located in Madrid, Spain. Participants were a random stratified sample
of 112 primary c
are physicians. Physicians' consultations were video
recorded for 4 hours. Clinical questions arising during the patient
visit and the sources of information used within the consultation to
answer questions were identified. Physicians with unanswered questions
were followed up by telephone 2 weeks later to determine whether their
questions had since been answered and the sources of information used.
Clinical questions were classified by topic and type of information.

RESULTS: A total of 3,511 patient consultations (mean length, 7.8
minutes) were recorded, leading to 635 clinical questions (0.18
questions per consultation). The most frequent questions were related to
diagnosis (53%) and treatment (26%). The most frequent generic type of
questions was "What is the cause of symptom x?" (20.5%). Physicians
searched for answers to 22.8% of the questions (9.6% during
consultations). The time taken and the success rate in finding an answer
during a consultation and afterward were 2 minutes (100%) and 32 minutes
(75%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: Primary care physicians working in settings where
consultations are of short duration have time to answer only 1 in 5 of
their questions. Better methods are needed to provide answers to
questions that arise in office practice in settings where average
consultation time is less than 10 minutes.

PMID: 17664501 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]PMCID: PMC1934982Free PMC
Article

Images from this publication.See all images (1)   Free text  

   


Publication Types, MeSH Terms  


LinkOut - more resources  



On 2010-11-15, at 1:45 PM, "Farhad Shokraneh Naneh Karan"  wrote:

    Dear Philipp,

     

    I cited similar information in my master thesis using following
book:

     

    Straus ES, Richardson WS, Glasziou P, Haynes RB. Evidence-based
medicine: how to practice and teach EBM. 3rd ed. London: Elsevier
Churchill Livingstone; 2005: Page 2, Paragraph 3...

     

    "our daily need for valid information about diagnosis, prognosis,
therapy, and prevention (up to five times per inpatient (5) and twice
for every three outpatients(6)".

     

    5. Osheroff JA, Forsythe DE, Buchanan BG, Bankowitz RA, Blumenfeld
BH, Miller RA. Physicians' information needs: analysis of questions
posed during clinical teaching. Ann Intern Med 1991; 114: 576-81

    6. Covell DG, Uman GC, Manning PR. Information needs in office
practice: are they being met? Ann Intern Med 1985;103: 96-9

     

    Best Wishes
    Farhad

     

    
     

    On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:53 PM, Dahm, Philipp  wrote:

    I have people cite a paper that found that the average clinicians
has 3 - 6 clinical questions per patient encounter.
    
    Can anyone provide the reference, please?
    
    Thanks
    
    Ph*

    
    
    
    -- 

    Farhad Shokraneh, BSc, MS

    Medical Librarianship and Information Science
    Center for Gifted and Talented Students
    Iran University of Medical Sciences

    Tehran, Iran

     

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager