Hahaha. What a way to start the conversation, Andreas - thanks!
Perhaps we should start a list of rules then? For example:
1. All ideas must cite precedented use in a museum or public gallery, but can't have been in Berlin.
2. Only votes that I like will be counted.
3. The above are null and void if you hang about for long enough. While curatorial experience is not a requirement, it's recommended you start all emails by stating how long you have been a member of CRUMB.
4. You may add to, or delete from, this list if I say so.
Onward and upward!
nathaniel
http://nathanielstern.com
On Nov 12, 2010, at 3:16 AM, Andreas Broeckmann wrote:
> At 19:15 Uhr -0600 11.11.2010, Nathaniel Stern wrote:
>> For Transmediale, we've proposed another community-based collaboration. Specifically, we said we'd ask the members of the CRUMB list-serv for recommendations on how to "exhibit" our work. We are asking for your expertise and ideas. The installation and exhibition will be decided as a collaboration between you, us, and the Transmediale folks: Syelle Hase <[log in to unmask]> and Stephen Kovats <[log in to unmask]>. We'll be keeping records of this discussion as well, in case it is to become part of the work. There are some space and other resource limitations, as always, but we're very open to anything feasible within that scope. Consensus on the best way forward is not necessary, and any and all ideas and viewpoints are welcome. We hope you want to be involved, and to come up with some fantastic ways of presenting our work.
>
>
> dear nathaniel,
>
> great proposal. but if it is really and genuinely *Wikipedia* Art, shouldn't there be some dictatorial idiosyncracies and pseudo-objective criteria factored into the selection process? otherwise it may qualify, eventually, for being registered on "Wikipedia", without being truly "in the spirit of"?
>
> best regards,
> -a
|
