JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Archives


MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Archives

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Archives


MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Home

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Home

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH  October 2010

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH October 2010

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Physiological disturbance

From:

Andrew Symon <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

A forum for discussion on midwifery and reproductive health research." <[log in to unmask]>, Andrew Symon <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:01:21 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (219 lines)

Thank you, Mary, for opening that one out. It was one of my first
thoughts too, on reading this thread.
A huge amount of money has gone into trying to make birthing units
'homely' (whatever that means), because there is an awareness that the
environment can have an important impact on physiology.

We've just had an article accepted by Midwifery which looks at
women-partner dyads, and their views of the environment and the care
received. In this paper we didn't explicitly tie this in with clinical
outcomes, but there is some evidence that the clinical environment does
affect clinical outcomes. In short, a hostile environment may hinder the
normal physiological process because it prevents the woman from
relaxing.
We discussed this in an earlier paper too: 

Symon A, Paul J, Butchart M, Carr V, Dugard P (2007) Self-rated
‘no’ and ‘low’ risk pregnancy: a comparison of outcomes
for women in obstetric-led and midwife-led units in England. Birth, 34
(4): 325-332

Environment is more than décor - it also includes perceptions of the
staff encountered. A bit tangential to your original query, Claire, but
it may open up another avenue for you.
Good luck with your research.

Andrew Symon






Dr. Andrew Symon
Senior Lecturer
School of Nursing & Midwifery
University of Dundee
01382 388553
http://dundee.academia.edu/AndrewSymon/


************************************************************
Please consider the environment.  Do you really need to print this
email?

>>> "Stewart, Mary" <[log in to unmask]> 21/10/2010 16:27
>>>
Hello Kirsty and Claire, and thank you to you both for opening this
interesting and important discussion.  My comment is a bit tangential,
to be honest, but there is a growing body of literature that explores
the concept of building design and health, particularly in relation to
hospitals, health centres etc.  This link gives a bit more information:
 http://www.adesignforhealth.co.uk/research2.php 

I think there is huge potential for inter-disciplinary and
inter-professional work e.g. collaboration with architects, art
therapists, geographers, social scientists as well as health
professionals and, most importantly, service users.  So much money is
spent on hospitals and other public buildings - it would be great if
there was a bit more holistic planning in the early stages of design.

Very best wishes

Mary


Mary Stewart
Consultant midwife
Room J334
Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
369 Fulham Road
London SW10 9NH
 
Tel: 07872 423085

-----Original Message-----
From: A forum for discussion on midwifery and reproductive health
research. [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Coxon,
Kirstie
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 8:34 AM
To: [log in to unmask] 
Subject: Physiological disturbance

Hi 
thanks Claire for your email - I would be very keen to see Sarah
Buckley's paper, if you can send it to me ([log in to unmask]),
or if you send me the reference I should be able to track it down. 

To other Jiscmail colleagues, I responded to Claire's initial email
'off list' and said I'd be interested to know if she was aware of papers
or resources that discuss the concept of physiological disturbance
during birth. I am not a physiologist, but I am researching womens'
choice of place of birth, and apprehension about transfer or moving
during labour plays an important part in women's decisions, especially
when they are considering Freestanding Midwifery Unit or home birth,
less so with Alongside Midwifery Units and Obstetric Units (although in
some post -natal interviews, women then discuss the impact of multiple
moves within hospitals, so I think that it's unanticipated that they may
have to move often within hospitals, rather than it not affecting
hospital births). Having looked at this issue a while ago, I was
surprised to find that little is published, although I am aware of
Michel 
Odent's work and most recently, Fahy and colleagues' text on
Birth Territory and Midwifery Guardianship. 

As Claire has reassured me that she also is surprised that little is
published on this topic, I thought I might open my request up to the
list, (being normally quite shy and a bit of a list 'lurker'!) and
enquire if others know about research into the impact of different
places, or moving between places, on labour and birth - including
physiological disturbance.

many thanks

Kirstie

Kirstie Coxon

Research Associate & NIHR Research Training Fellow
Room 708
Department of Public Health and Primary Care Research
King's College, London
Capital House
42 Weston Street
London
SE1 3QD

Tel
07986 911814 (mobile and study contact number)
0207 848 6648
Fax 0207 848 6620
________________________________________
From: A forum for discussion on midwifery and reproductive health
research. [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Claire Feeley
[[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: 20 October 2010 14:28
To: [log in to unmask] 
Subject: Re: New member

Hi, thanks for all your welcome messages!

I have got hold of Rixa's thesis thank you, its fab, and is a main
component of my dissertation.  There is another thesis by Lauren Brown
and a paper by Amy Miller. All from the US.  I have just submitted the
first draft of my dissertation so when its finally ready for submission
I shall be happy to post it, if it would be of interest.  It is a very
much under researched area.

A question I pose is what can midwives and obs learn from women who
freebirth?  For certainly much of my attraction to the subject has
stemmed from the iatrogenesis I have witnessed/been a part of whilst
training and it certainly has caused me to deeply reflect upon my
practice and role as a midwife.  It also has caused me to really get to
grips with my own birth experience, and although I mostly had a postive
experience, I did have some unresolved issues surrounding it.  Exploring
freebirthing has created new angles to examine it through which has been
interesting.


In reply to Kirsty, I find it fascinating that there is so little about
physiological disturbance out there!  Prior to my degree I read as much
Michel Odent as I could, and it just simply made sense to me.  Thank you
for the other pointers, I shall look up Nadine Edwards book, I have not
come across it yet.  The references that the women use in freebirthing
is mainly Odent and Sarah Buckley who writes about undisturbed birth,
she is a GP in Australia and I can send you her article if you wish?  I
remember Stephanie Meakin giving a wonderful talk at the ARM conference
2 years ago about the hormonal interplay, although I am not sure what
she has written.

Thanks again for all your welcomes.  This is certainly feeding my
interest in research!

Claire
3rd midwifery student

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

[log in to unmask]: 

This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally privileged.
If you have received it in error, you are on notice of its status.
Please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this
message from your system.
Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes,
or disclose its contents to any other person: to do so could be a
breach of confidence.
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
sender,
except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of the
Trust.
Thank you for your co-operation.

This footnote confirms that the message has been swept for computer
viruses by
McAfee VirusScan Enterprise Edition: whilst every care is taken to
avoid the transmission
of virus code; please ensure that you have up to date virus detection
software before opening
any E-mail messages or attachments.

Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

If you have received this email in error please no
tify the originator
of the message.

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
sender.

Scanning of this message and addition of this footer is performed
by Websense Email Security software in conjunction with 
Mcafee virus detection software.



The University of Dundee is a registered Scottish charity, No: SC015096

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager