Re the experience of Indians in Britain; I can see the significance that can be drawn out for example of particular life stories, such as Duleep Singh, for example, or the Asian soldiers in Brighton in WW1, which also relate to the question What was Britain doing in India in the first place, but the rationale for the extremely vague 'experience of Britons in India' needs to be much sharper, in order to explore questions about the British Empire and Resistance to it, and that has to bring in the 'experience' of key Indian figures who fought the British in the 18th & 19thc, such as Rhani of Jhansi, or Tippu, otherwise its skewed.
In 2000 I was commissioned to write a teachers booklet for English Heritage on diversity aspects of visiting their properties of all periods. They entitled it 'Cultural Connections'. Some of it was about Duleep Singh whose portrait hangs in Osborne House, in a corridoor of portraits of Indian subjects leading to the Durbar Room. The editor sanitised the critical questions which I think can and should be drawn from his tragic story, and the Durbar Room as a representation of the power of the Raj, (let me not mention an apalling mistake that was stuck in). Instead that section came over as 'Queen Victoria liked India and the Indians' But the relationship between Britain and India cannot of course be explained thus! So the experience of Britons in India needs to be selected to exemplify various aspects of empire history and British attitudes to it.
More recently a teacher who spoke at a HA Forum described materials on Duleep Singh he has developed, don't rembmer his name.
|