you can incorporate in Delaware for US$99.
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> After a thorough skimming, the word "hogwash" come to mind.
>
> Hal Serving the tri-state area.
>
> Halvard Johnson
> ================
>
> [log in to unmask]
> http://sites.google.com/site/halvardjohnson/Home
> http://entropyandme.blogspot.com
> http://imageswithoutwords.blogspot.com
> http://www.hamiltonstone.org
> <http://www.hamiltonstone.org>
> <http://www.hamiltonstone.org>*The Perfection of Mozart's Third Eye and
> Other Sonnets*
>
> http://www.scribd.com/doc/27039868/Halvard-Johnson-THE-PERFECTION-OF-MOZART-S-THIRD-EYE-Other-Sonnets
>
> *Tango Bouquet*
> <
> http://www.scribd.com/doc/27039868/Halvard-Johnson-THE-PERFECTION-OF-MOZART-S-THIRD-EYE-Other-Sonnets
> >
> https://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0ATDp6rzKkBkhZGZwand2cHdfOWc1Mnh3Zw&hl=en
>
> <
> https://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0ATDp6rzKkBkhZGZwand2cHdfOWc1Mnh3Zw&hl=en
> >
> *Theory of Harmony*
> *
>
> https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http://xpressed.wippiespace.com/fall04/theory1.pdf
> *
> *Rapsodie espagnole*
> *
>
> https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http://xpressed.wippiespace.com/rapsodi.pdf
> *
> *
> *
> *<
> https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http://xpressed.wippiespace.com/rapsodi.pdf
> >The
> Sonnet Project*
> *
>
> https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http://xpressed.wippiespace.com/hsonnet.pdf
> *
> *
> *
> *<
> https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http://xpressed.wippiespace.com/hsonnet.pdf
> >
> G(e)nome*
> *http://xpressed.wippiespace.com/fall03/genome.pdf
> *
>
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> > “Entitlements: Post-Modernity, Capitalism, and the Threat to Poetry's
> > History” by Adam Filed at The Argotist Online:
> > http://www.argotistonline.co.uk/Fieled%20essay%204.htm
> > Excerpt:
> > The flimsy history created by post-modernity contrives to impose an
> > intimidating veneer; but a lack of real engagement with history creates a
> > sense of the ephemeral which, if not embraced, (and post-modernists do
> > express consonance with the “ephemeral” as such) must be rejected
> > absolutely. Many post-modern equations are simple: “incorporate or
> perish”
> > is one. What, beyond creating an imposing veneer, constitutes post-modern
> > “incorporation”? Nothing. Post-modernists, for what’s often an obvious
> > reason, feel entitled to stop at the surface; the reason is that a
> > persistent sense of entitlement inhibits and destroys human depth.
> > Deprivation often engenders depth— if you have never been deprived, it is
> > difficult to imagine a need for depth. And if you espouse and embrace
> > Marxist levels of material engagement, but fail to connect them to your
> own
> > existence and begin to take some personal responsibility for it, you
> become
> > a kind of sham factory owner. Anyone in the arts who has not inherited
> funds
> > the way that you have becomes an underling. Underlings can be brushed
> aside;
> > what begins as warped Marxism becomes straightforward Darwinian obduracy.
> > Simply put, the arts aren’t fair, and they never have been. What
> > post-modernity imposes is a context in which there is not only no justice
> in
> > who “gets in,” there is no justice in what they feel they are entitled to
> do
> > when/if they do get in. What do they feel entitled to do, more often than
> > not?
> >
>
--
All best,
Catherine Daly
[log in to unmask]
|