Dear FSL experts,
I ran probabilistic tractography on a quite large sample of HC and I realized that in some of them the derived fdt_paths are much more informative (more vs few fibers reconstructed) than in others. So, going back to the bedpost folders, I realized that some of my subjects, but not all of them, have an extra output, i.e.= dyads*_ dispersion. I searched the FSL archive, but I found just one post about this. So, can anybody
1. provide a better description of or references to learn more about this output?
2. suggest a possible explanation of why just some of my subjects have this output (is this noise-related??) and confirm that the presence of dyads*_ dispersion can explain the difference seen in the estimated fdt_paths
3. suggest a way to implement the use of this output in the estimation of my fdt_paths, I order to confidently include these "different" subjects in one group
Thank you very much!!!
Kind Regards
Amelia
|