JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for LIS-LINK Archives


LIS-LINK Archives

LIS-LINK Archives


LIS-LINK@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

LIS-LINK Home

LIS-LINK Home

LIS-LINK  May 2010

LIS-LINK May 2010

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Referencing from theses/dissertations

From:

Veronica Murray <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Veronica Murray <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 28 May 2010 19:57:23 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (117 lines)

Hi Charles,

sorry if you've already answered this question and I missed it. Is the default legal assumption, then, that the author *gives permission* or that the author *does not give permission*? In other words, if permission has not been explicitly withrawn, is the thesis safe to copy, or must one always seek permission?

Would it be good practice for libraries holding theses on their shelves to endeavour to establish the author's wishes when the thesis is lodged with the library and insert a notice into any thesis that must not be reproduced?

How do BL approach this with theses lodged there? Ethos now harvests institutional repositories.

I totally take your point on risk management.

And I hope you are well!

Veronica [Harry]

Veronica Murray
Subject Librarian (Health Care, Nursing and Midwifery)
University of the West of Scotland
Paisley Campus
Paisley PA1 2BE

0141-848-3760
[log in to unmask]
________________________________________
From: A general Library and Information Science list for news and discussion. [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of C Oppenheim [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 28 May 2010 14:48
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Referencing from theses/dissertations

I would like to comment on your summary of responses.

A copy of a thesis if validly requested under Freedom of Information Act is  NOT  a published work.  It can only be used by the requestor for his/her FoI purposes and may not be further reproduced - the FoI Act and the Copyright Act are totally clear on that point.

Tim Padfield's book goes into considerable detail as to what is meant by "published" and makes it clear the mere putting of an item on a library shelf does not make it published. In all probability, then,  a thesis is an unpublished work.  The fact that it has passed an examination is irrelevant.  What counts is whether multiple copies have been made to satisfy demand for copies. As an unpublished work, a thesis can be copied by, or on behalf of a patron so long as the depositor has not said it can't be copied. Fair dealing CANNOT over-rule a depositor's wishes.

The KEY question is not, however, the formal legal position, but the management of risk;  if someone ignores a depositor's request and makes a copy anyway, how likely is it that they will be found out?  That's the real issue!

Charles
________________________________________
From: A general Library and Information Science list for news and discussion. [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Graham Fennell [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 28 May 2010 14:30
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Referencing from theses/dissertations

Thanks to everyone who responded to my enquiry about the copyright status of theses and dissertations. As promised, I am reporting back a summary of responses. There is no particular consensus on the matter because the law appears, to an extent, to be open to interpretation. However, most people suggest a degree of leniency as regards quoting from theses held in library collections.

Thanks,
Graham

Summary of responses:

1) I think that this was discussed on lis-copyseek a couple of years ago at least! I think that the upshot was that you can't prevent people from referencing, under copyright law. But I'd be very interested to hear more about where this came from and why it might exist because I think you're right, the statement has been used with old theses at a number of institutions.

-------------------------

2) Surely fair-dealing under copyright law exists for theses too, just so
long as the quotation is acknowledged. To be on the safe side, we have
now tried to track down as many authors of older theses as possible,
asking them what reproduction they would allow and we keep their reply
with the thesis. For more recent submissions we ask at the time of
receipt of the thesis what reproduction authors will allow.

-------------------------

3) No firm foundation to start with because there is no agreement over whether a thesis is technically an unpublished work or whether it is a published work.

Fair dealing applies to all works whether published or unpublished, and although it is a defence rather than an exception, there may still be a case whereby someone could argue that quoting from a thesis without obtaining copyright permission could be fair dealing. It would take a court case to decide, but one could argue that the thesis is "made available to the public" simply by virtue of it being on a library shelf.

Now, if the thesis has been embargoed or contains sensitive information of some sort, then it is possible that copyright permission would need to be sought to reproduce aspects of it such as short quotations.

A thesis, once requested under Freedom of Information Act, is effectively turned into a published work.

Generally accepted that students writing a thesis can quote from other theses under the provisions of fair dealing. There may also be the educational exception for assessed work which applies here too - which states that anything used for the purposes of assessment does not infringe copyright in the original work.

I would say that short quotations from theses, particularly for criticism and review, are acceptable.

-------------------------

4) The situation is that reproducing any of a thesis is NOT permitted ONLY so long as the author had expressly stated he/she did not to permit such reproduction.  A library notice without such explicit instructions has no legal validity.

It depends on whether the authors of theses were specifically asked if they wished to restrict copying?  Only if they were asked and agreed to this restriction does the restriction stand. However, if the library has no record of this, then it's best to respect the terms of the notice.

It is generally agreed a thesis is an unpublished work and yes, this is enshrined in the law.

A good reference source for all of this is Tim Padfield's excellent "Copyright for Archivists and Records Managers", Facet, 2010 - see chapter 5.3.12

-------------------------

5) What exactly is an 'unpublished work'?

If the author of a thesis deposits a copy in a library knowing that without an explicit request to the contrary it will be made publicly available for consultation are they not effectively publishing it?

-------------------------

6) A thesis usually counts as published work if it has passed the exam/examination (thus fit for publication). There can be many exceptions so one may have to take it on a case by case basis if there is any uncertainty. Ensure one reads and implements all the instructions from all libraries and publishers.

-------------------------

7) My feeling would be that without permission, lecturers can quote a small amount (as long as it is not the most important small amount) without permission, as long as they cite where they took it from and who wrote the work. If it is more than approx. 5% or the most important part, then they really should get permission.
***************************************************************************************************************

University of the West of Scotland aims to have a transformational influence on the economic, social and cultural development of the West of Scotland and beyond by providing relevant, high quality, inclusive higher education and innovative and useful research. 

Visit www.uws.ac.uk for more details

University of the West of Scotland is a registered Scottish charity. Charity number SC002520.

***************************************************************************************************************

Legal disclaimer
--------------------------

The information transmitted is the property of the University of the West of Scotland and is intended only for the person or entity 
to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material.  Statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail may not represent those of the company.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination and other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.
If you received this in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete the material from any computer. 

--------------------------

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager