JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CCP4BB Archives


CCP4BB Archives

CCP4BB Archives


CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CCP4BB Home

CCP4BB Home

CCP4BB  April 2010

CCP4BB April 2010

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: CCP4BB Digest - 9 Apr 2010 to 10 Apr 2010 (#2010-97)

From:

Matthew E Thornton <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Matthew E Thornton <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 11 Apr 2010 00:30:59 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (1 lines)



CCP4BB automatic digest system <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>There are 5 messages totaling 519 lines in this issue.
>
>Topics of the day:
>
>  1. freezing crystals grown in isopropanol condition
>  2. phosphate v sulfate (3)
>  3. Does the substrate has access to the active site?
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Date:    Sat, 10 Apr 2010 11:09:08 +0100
>From:    Patrick Shaw Stewart <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: Re: freezing crystals grown in isopropanol condition
>
>Chris
>
>Isopropanol is said a very good precipitant but it's unpopular because it's
>so difficult to harvest crystals
>
>However there's a very convenient way to grow and harvest crystals in
>isopropanol using Vapor Batch plates.
>
>Basically you set up microbatch-under-oil drops containing all the
>ingredients except for the isopropanol, and cover with Al's Oils (silicone
>mixed with paraffin oil).  Then you put e.g. in your case 25% isopropanol in
>the reservoir around the outside of the Vapor Batch plate.  Over a few hours
>the isopropanol will diffuse through the Al's Oils into the drops.
>
>The great advantage is that the oil also becomes saturated with isopropanol
>(they are only partially miscible in fact) so that the oil acts as a barrier
>when you're harvesting crystals.
>
>You can usually convert vapor diffusion conditions to microbatch in a single
>24-well experiment where you vary protein against precipitant.
>
>You don't need to remove the oil to collect data.
>
>This is all described in Lesley Haire's winning entry to a competition we
>organized a few years ago: http://www.douglas.co.uk/winner1.htm
>
>See also Mortuza et al. High-resolution structure of a retroviral capsid
>hexameric amino-terminal domain.  Nature 431 (2004), pp 481-485.
>
>The Vapor Batch plate can be seen at http://www.douglas.co.uk/vb.htm
>
>If you or anyone on the b.b. would like to try some samples of Vapor Batch
>plates just let me know
>
>Best wishes
>
>Patrick
>
>
>
>
>
>On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Chris Meier <
>[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I have a protein which crystallizes in 25% isopropanol, at pH4.5.
>>
>> Does anyone have experience freezing crystals grown in such a condition?
>> What cryoprotectants should I try?
>> Can isopropanol itself act as a cryoprotectant?
>> Any suggestions on how to deal with isopropanol evaporation during
>> mounting?
>>
>> Many thanks and best wishes,
>> Chris
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>-- 
>[log in to unmask]    Douglas Instruments Ltd.
>DouglasHouse, EastGarston, Hungerford, Berkshire, RG177HD, UK
>Directors: Peter Baldock, Patrick Shaw Stewart
>
>http://www.douglas.co.uk
>Tel: 44 (0) 148-864-9090    US toll-free 1-877-225-2034
>Regd. England 2177994, VAT Reg. GB 480 7371 36
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date:    Sat, 10 Apr 2010 10:49:08 -0400
>From:    wtempel <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: phosphate v sulfate
>
>Dear colleagues,
>I would like to poll the community on the prevailing practice of
>distinguishing between phosphate and sulfate in their structures.
>Suppose all of the following apply:
>1) a well contoured tetrahedral density in your model-phased 2Fo-Fc map in
>the active site of your kinase or GTPase protein.
>2) a significant, say 5*sigma, coincident peak in your model-phased
>anomalous difference fourier map from data collected at a Cu rotating anode
>source.
>3) The crystal grew in 2M ammonium sulfate.
>Please post your answers to the list if you feel this question is of general
>interest.*
>Thank you for your input.
>Wolfram Tempel
>
> *If it is not, I apologize to everyone for wasting their valuable time.
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date:    Sat, 10 Apr 2010 12:11:16 -0400
>From:    Dhirendra K Simanshu <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: Re: phosphate v sulfate
>
>Hello,
>
>Thanks for this interesting poll!
>I have had similar doubt couple of times in the recent past.
>I think in the absence of anomalous signal for confirming presence of
>phosphate or sulphate, I would prefer to assign the electron density to the
>one which is present in higher concentration in the crystallization drop.
>Just on the basis of electron density, co-ordination geometry and functional
>groups attached to the tetrahedral density, I assume it is very difficult to
>say if it is phosphate or sulphate.
>
>In your case, I would go for SO4 instead of PO4.
>I would also like to know other people's experiences in such cases.
>Regards
>Simanshu
>
>On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 10:49 AM, wtempel <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Dear colleagues,
>> I would like to poll the community on the prevailing practice of
>> distinguishing between phosphate and sulfate in their structures.
>> Suppose all of the following apply:
>> 1) a well contoured tetrahedral density in your model-phased 2Fo-Fc map in
>> the active site of your kinase or GTPase protein.
>> 2) a significant, say 5*sigma, coincident peak in your model-phased
>> anomalous difference fourier map from data collected at a Cu rotating anode
>> source.
>> 3) The crystal grew in 2M ammonium sulfate.
>> Please post your answers to the list if you feel this question is of
>> general interest.*
>> Thank you for your input.
>> Wolfram Tempel
>>
>>  *If it is not, I apologize to everyone for wasting their valuable time.
>>
>>
>
>
>-- 
>Dhirendra K Simanshu
>Research Scholar
>Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
>New York, NY, USA
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date:    Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:21:52 -0500
>From:    Jim Pflugrath <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: Re: phosphate v sulfate
>
>One might also check the pH of your crystal and the number of hydrogen bond
>donors from the putative sulfate (zero?) or the putative phosphate
>(non-zero).
>I'm alluding to the structures of the sulfate-binding protein and the
>phosphate-binding protein from Quiocho's group.
> 
>Jim
>
>  _____  
>
>From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
>wtempel
>Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2010 9:49 AM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: [ccp4bb] phosphate v sulfate
>
>
>Dear colleagues, 
>I would like to poll the community on the prevailing practice of
>distinguishing between phosphate and sulfate in their structures.
>Suppose all of the following apply:
>1) a well contoured tetrahedral density in your model-phased 2Fo-Fc map in
>the active site of your kinase or GTPase protein.
>2) a significant, say 5*sigma, coincident peak in your model-phased
>anomalous difference fourier map from data collected at a Cu rotating anode
>source.
>3) The crystal grew in 2M ammonium sulfate.
>Please post your answers to the list if you feel this question is of general
>interest.*
>Thank you for your input.
>Wolfram Tempel
>
> *If it is not, I apologize to everyone for wasting their valuable time.
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date:    Sat, 10 Apr 2010 12:43:10 -0700
>From:    xaravich ivan <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: Re: Does the substrate has access to the active site?
>
>Hi,
>I am assuming the enzyme is not active, or by substrate you do not mean the
>actual substrate, may be an analogue. The substrate might be converted into
>product and the leave through the channel and you will not find anything
>bound to it. But I think you have taken care of that.
>
>
>
>On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 7:00 AM, Ed Pozharski <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> It is also possible that mother liquor prevents binding (although often
>> in such cases you would see some precipitant component in the active
>> site.
>>
>> I would generally bet on need for conformational change.  And you expect
>> to see the product complex, right?
>>
>> Ed.
>>
>> On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 11:15 +0200, Paul Lindblom wrote:
>> > Dear Bulletin Board,
>> >
>> > I am trying to soak substrate into crystals of an enzyme, but so far I
>> > can't see the substrate in the structure. Does anyone knows a program
>> > to ensure that the entrance to the central cavity is accessibly? I
>> > mean based on the whole crystal. I already checked the crystal packing
>> > manually and it seems that the way is free more or less, but I find it
>> > hard to interpret.
>> >
>> > Thanks in advance,
>> >
>> > P.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Edwin Pozharski, PhD, Assistant Professor
>> University of Maryland, Baltimore
>> ----------------------------------------------
>> When the Way is forgotten duty and justice appear;
>> Then knowledge and wisdom are born along with hypocrisy.
>> When harmonious relationships dissolve then respect and devotion arise;
>> When a nation falls to chaos then loyalty and patriotism are born.
>> ------------------------------   / Lao Tse /
>>
>
>------------------------------
>
>End of CCP4BB Digest - 9 Apr 2010 to 10 Apr 2010 (#2010-97)
>***********************************************************

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager