I and many people here at Washington University in St. Louis would also
be interested in the outcome.
We had some discussion with Siemens a while ago involving digging into
the shadow parameters of the Siemens IMA header to find out the most
truthful b-matrix. It gets complicated with angulated slice orientation.
I'm personally very confused right now.
Thanks
Gordon
On 04/03/2010 11:33 AM, Andreas Bartsch wrote:
> Hi,
> please make sure to inform Jolinda and and Chris Rhorden about the outcome.
> In my experience, the difference between the two was neglible but that was prior to Sioemens VB17.
> Cheers-
> Andreas
> ________________________________________
> Von: FSL - FMRIB's Software Library [[log in to unmask]] im Auftrag von Martin Reiss-Zimmermann [[log in to unmask]]
> Gesendet: Samstag, 3. April 2010 17:21
> An: [log in to unmask]
> Betreff: Re: [FSL] which bvecs to trust?
>
> Hey Martin,
>
> thank you for for this nice and easy test. I also noticed differences in using dcm2nii and MRIConvert on Trio 3T image files which lead to different results in tbss. I'm gonna run a dti dataset without any angulation and will post the results after using the two converting programs again.
>
|