JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CCP4BB Archives


CCP4BB Archives

CCP4BB Archives


CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CCP4BB Home

CCP4BB Home

CCP4BB  March 2010

CCP4BB March 2010

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: TCEP effect on protein

From:

Ho Leung Ng <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Ho Leung Ng <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:40:22 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (274 lines)

Does your SDS-PAGE loading buffer contain a reducing agent like beta
mercaptoethanol? That could be responsible for the difference between
your SDS-PAGE and HPLC results.


ho

On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 5:01 PM, CCP4BB automatic digest system
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> There are 5 messages totaling 490 lines in this issue.
>
> Topics of the day:
>
>  1. TCEP effect on protein (4)
>  2. 3 PhD studentships available immediately
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Date:    Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:51:30 -0800
> From:    megha goyal <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: TCEP effect on protein
>
> Hi all,
>
> My protein is relatively pure except the dimer. i used 10 mM TCEP to reduce
> it (directly added 1 M TCEP to make final volume of 10mM and kept at room
> temperature for 10 mins] then i dialysed the protein sample to remove TCEP
> [dialysis buffer is Na acetate pH 4.0].
>
> On performing SDS PAGE analysis after dialysis of the protein we are getting
> no dimer band, only band of our protein is observed and same is the case
> with UV reading there is no change in it. But the HPLC analysis of the
> protein shows two peaks instead of one peak as observed before TCEP
> treatment. what can be the reason for this. Kindly guide. i need the protein
> to formulate and conduct stability studies on the sample. the protein we
> obtain after IEX is pure except the dimer and i do not want to go for SEC as
> it greatly reduces protein content and also is quite time consuming. any
> light on what is happening will bevery useful.
>
> thanks and regards
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date:    Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:37:43 +0100
> From:    Ganesh Natrajan <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: TCEP effect on protein
>
>
>
> Hi Megha,
>
> The two peaks on the HPLC indicate that your protein is
> existing in a monomer-dimer equilibrium in solution. The dimerisation is
> most probably caused by disulphide bridges. The use of TCEP is breaking
> those disulphides and that is causing the equilibrium to move towards the
> monomeric state. However, when the TCEP is dialysed out, the disulphides
> start forming again and this is causing the equilibrum to move towards the
> dimeric state, a process clearly hastened by the strongly oxidising pH 4 of
> the dialysis buffer.
>
> Now it all depends on what you want to do. If you
> want to use the protein in a (largely) monomeric form, I would recommend
> that you don't dialyse out the TCEP.
>
> regards
>
> Ganesh
>
>
> **********************************************
> Blow, blow, thou winter
> wind
> Thou art not so unkind
> As man's ingratitude;
> Thy tooth is not so
> keen,
> Because thou art not seen,
> Although thy breath be rude.
>
> -William
> Shakespeare
> **********************************************
>
> On Thu, 25 Mar
> 2010 22:51:30 -0800, megha goyal  wrote:  Hi all,   My protein is
> relatively pure except the dimer. i used 10 mM TCEP to reduce it (directly
> added 1 M TCEP to make final volume of 10mM and kept at room temperature
> for 10 mins] then i dialysed the protein sample to remove TCEP [dialysis
> buffer is Na acetate pH 4.0].   On performing SDS PAGE analysis after
> dialysis of the protein we are getting no dimer band, only band of our
> protein is observed and same is the case with UV reading there is no change
> in it. But the HPLC analysis of the protein shows two peaks instead of one
> peak as observed before TCEP treatment. what can be the reason for this.
> Kindly guide. i need the protein to formulate and conduct stability studies
> on the sample. the protein we obtain after IEX is pure except the dimer and
> i do not want to go for SEC as it greatly reduces protein content and also
> is quite time consuming. any light on what is happening will bevery useful.
>  thanks and regards
>
> --
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date:    Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:49:55 +0100
> From:    Matthias Zebisch <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: TCEP effect on protein
>
> Hi Ganesh and Mega!
>
> I do not agree with Ganesh. I assume, Megha, that truly reversed
> phaseHPLC was used. This is a denaturing method and the natural
> disulfide should not form again during the run.
> Also pH 4 can not be described "oxidizing". Actually, reduced proteins
> are often dialyzed against acidic buffers to prevent disulfide formation
> via the thiolate anion.
> Still, a reducing agent may be used during the run?
>
> Sorry that I can not offer a solution to the real problem. More
> experimental details may be necessary.
>
> Bets regards, Matthias
>
> Am 3/26/2010 8:37 AM, schrieb Ganesh Natrajan:
>>
>> Hi Megha,
>>
>> The two peaks on the HPLC indicate that your protein is existing in a
>> monomer-dimer equilibrium in solution. The dimerisation is most
>> probably caused by disulphide bridges. The use of TCEP is breaking
>> those disulphides and that is causing the equilibrium to move towards
>> the monomeric state. However, when the TCEP is dialysed out, the
>> disulphides start forming again and this is causing the equilibrum to
>> move towards the dimeric state, a process clearly hastened by the
>> strongly oxidising pH 4 of the dialysis buffer.
>>
>> Now it all depends on what you want to do. If you want to use the
>> protein in a (largely) monomeric form, I would recommend that you
>> don't dialyse out the TCEP.
>>
>> regards
>>
>> Ganesh
>>
>> **********************************************
>> Blow, blow, thou winter wind
>> Thou art not so unkind
>> As man's ingratitude;
>> Thy tooth is not so keen,
>> Because thou art not seen,
>> Although thy breath be rude.
>>
>> -William Shakespeare
>> **********************************************
>>
>> On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:51:30 -0800, megha goyal <[log in to unmask]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>     Hi all,
>>     My protein is relatively pure except the dimer. i used 10 mM TCEP
>>     to reduce it (directly added 1 M TCEP to make final volume of 10mM
>>     and kept at room temperature for 10 mins] then i dialysed the
>>     protein sample to remove TCEP [dialysis buffer is Na acetate pH 4.0].
>>     On performing SDS PAGE analysis after dialysis of the protein we
>>     are getting no dimer band, only band of our protein is observed
>>     and same is the case with UV reading there is no change in it. But
>>     the HPLC analysis of the protein shows two peaks instead of one
>>     peak as observed before TCEP treatment. what can be the reason for
>>     this. Kindly guide. i need the protein to formulate and conduct
>>     stability studies on the sample. the protein we obtain after IEX
>>     is pure except the dimer and i do not want to go for SEC as it
>>     greatly reduces protein content and also is quite time consuming.
>>     any light on what is happening will bevery useful.
>>     thanks and regards
>>
>> --
>>
>
>
> --
> ****************************************************
> Dr. Matthias Zebisch
> Universität Leipzig
> Biotechnologisch-Biomedizinisches Zentrum
> Strukturanalytik von Biopolymeren
> Deutscher Platz 5
> 04103 Leipzig
> Germany
> Phone: 0049-341-97-31323 (lab) -31312 (office)
> Fax  : 0049-341-97-31319
> email: [log in to unmask]
> ****************************************************
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date:    Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:53:07 +0000
> From:    "Hough, Mike" <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: 3 PhD studentships available immediately
>
> Dear CCP4bb,
>
> The following three studentship positions are available immediately at the University of Liverpool. Could you please pass these details on to any students in your departments or elsewhere who may be interested? Replies to the email addresses listed below, rather than to me please.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mike
>
>
> School of Biological Sciences, University of Liverpool
>
> 4-year joint BBSRC PhD Studentships – applications invited immediately
>
> Three PhD studentships are available in the Molecular Biophysics Group for research in the area of x-ray structural biology using the most advanced synchrotron radiation sources and the new light sources in the form of x-ray free electron lasers (XFELs). The studentships involve collaborations with scientists at the DIAMOND Light Source, UK and at the RIKEN Spring-8 Center, Japan. The successful candidates will have the exciting opportunity of spending up to 2 years at these premier science facilities working at the leading edge of structural biology. We are looking for applications now from highly committed and motivated graduates from any of the natural sciences who are ordinarily resident in the UK. Contact details and links to detailed project descriptions are given below:
>
> “Long wavelength X-ray diffraction experiments for structural studies from biological redox systems”
> [Strange, UoL & Wagner, DIAMOND]
> see: http://www.biophysics.liv.ac.uk/PhD_DLS.pdf
> contact [log in to unmask]
>
> “Metalloproteomics: Structure and function studies of metalloproteins of biomedical importance”
> [Hasnain, UoL & Shiro, RIKEN]
> see: http://www.biophysics.liv.ac.uk/PhD_RIKEN_Metalloprotein.pdf
> contact: [log in to unmask]
>
> “New Science exploration from XFEL: A new paradigm for structural visualisation of macromolecules”
> [Grossmann, UoL & Ishikawa, RIKEN]
> see: http://www.biophysics.liv.ac.uk/PhD_RIKEN_XFEL.pdf
> contact: [log in to unmask]
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date:    Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:40:48 -0700
> From:    James Holton <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: TCEP effect on protein
>
> Yes, it is possible that the disulfide is just re-forming when the TCEP
> is gone.  pH 4 is not favorable for the oxidation, but does not prohibit
> it either.  Especially if there are traces of metal ions around.  I
> learned this the hard way, as trace metals can catalyze the oxidation of
> methionine and selenomethionine as well.  In my hands, adding a pinch of
> EDTA (~1 mM final conc.) to the fraction coming off the HPLC stabilized
> the reduced species.  Since the HPLC I was using at the time was made of
> metal (and showed signs of rust around some of the fittings), it is
> perhaps not surprising that I had a few ppm of Fe++ in the mobile phase.
>
> -James Holton
> MAD Scientist
>
> megha goyal wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> My protein is relatively pure except the dimer. i used 10 mM TCEP to
>> reduce it (directly added 1 M TCEP to make final volume of 10mM and
>> kept at room temperature for 10 mins] then i dialysed the protein
>> sample to remove TCEP [dialysis buffer is Na acetate pH 4.0].
>>
>> On performing SDS PAGE analysis after dialysis of the protein we are
>> getting no dimer band, only band of our protein is observed and same
>> is the case with UV reading there is no change in it. But the HPLC
>> analysis of the protein shows two peaks instead of one peak as
>> observed before TCEP treatment. what can be the reason for this.
>> Kindly guide. i need the protein to formulate and conduct stability
>> studies on the sample. the protein we obtain after IEX is pure except
>> the dimer and i do not want to go for SEC as it greatly reduces
>> protein content and also is quite time consuming. any light on what is
>> happening will bevery useful.
>>
>> thanks and regards
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of CCP4BB Digest - 25 Mar 2010 to 26 Mar 2010 (#2010-82)
> ************************************************************
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager