Well, I never had the time, Chris. But many do, so no doubt the
problems you are finding will continue, alas.
You are managing to read an awful lot of stuff; I read that first
piece, & it seemed to me to show that whatever the technology,
eventually what they 'say' will still be part of the total experience,
& open to critique(s).
Doug
On 2-Mar-10, at 1:29 AM, Chris Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 17:20 +1100, Chris Jones wrote:
>>
>> Now I am getting really, really, really
>
> upset!
>
> Fortunately I do not have an enough bandwidth to become a member of
> second life. That stuff is ultimate BULLSHIT
>
> (complete with technology as the body of women on which exchange
> occurs.
> The indecent haste we see with burying Eve Sedwick's ideas along with
> her mortal body.)
>
> And to think some claim that SL is liberation. Bullshit, bullshit and
> more bullshit.
>
Douglas Barbour
[log in to unmask]
http://www.ualberta.ca/~dbarbour/
Latest books:
Continuations (with Sheila E Murphy)
http://www.uap.ualberta.ca/UAP.asp?LID=41&bookID=664
Wednesdays'
http://abovegroundpress.blogspot.com/2008/03/new-from-aboveground-press_10.html
It is ink
on paper love
Frank O'Hara
|