JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING  March 2010

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING March 2010

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Models of variable media acquisition

From:

Simon Biggs <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Simon Biggs <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:00:24 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (111 lines)

Iım with you Jon. The early days of the net were intriguing for artists as
either you embraced the idea that you had little control over how your work
would appear at the other end or you were destined to be frustrated. These
days, with high-band connections and better reception equipment, we have got
use to having control over how our work looks. In the process something has
been lost.

Interesting to hear about the 15% figure put aside by the Guggenheim for
variable media maintenance. I would argue that is not enough and 30% would
be a more realistic figure. This is what organisations and corporations
budget for equipment maintenance, usually through depreciation against tax,
and it seems a reasonable figure for artworks as well. It is the figure I
have always worked with when a permanent work has been commissioned and
produced. Sadly, although this figure ends up in the contract it is often
not observed in practice.

I wish to clarify my earlier discussion with Marcia Tanner. I am not against
artists selling their work. Most of my professional life I have been an
independent artist and the sort of academic post I have now has not been
typical. I have moved in and out of academia, mainly for artistic reasons (I
enjoy working in the multi-disciplinary research environments such
environments facilitate) rather than about my survival (my income dropped
when I last moved from being a fulltime artist to academia and I still see
my main job as being an artist). However, the European context is very
different to the USA. Here it is possible for an artist to live off
commissions from non-profit based organisations and that encourages a
certain model of production and consumption that needs not be predicated on
selling something that can then be sold on again. That is, the artist can
sell an experience rather than an artefact. They can sell it once or put it
on the road and sell it several times over. This model is closer to how
theatre or live music works and in some ways is inherently socialist. The
artist usually works with a producer who puts together the clients
(galleries, museums, festivals, public sites, etc) and negotiates the fees,
often in advance of a work being produced. State funding functions to
support this in that once you have a viable programme of events lined up
then the Arts Council or relevant public funder will then stump up the
production funds. Thus the work is publicly subsidised at various levels as
most of the clients are publicly funded as well. The main financial risk for
the artist is usually at the prototyping stage, creating something
compelling enough to set all these wheels in motion. That is often an
investment of time and infrastructure rather than materials. Usually this
means that when things reach the production stage the main creative bit is
over for the artist and they are focused on practicalities ­ although they
are probably working on their next prototype at the same time.

Or at least that use to be the model.

Public funding for the arts in the UK has taken a big hit in the last decade
and will do so even more in the next. Many artists, myself included, moved
over into academia in that decade because the money that dried up from the
Arts Councils started to flow from the Research Councils. This is well
documented. To access that research and production resource you need to have
a permanent academic post. In that respect the logic underpinning decisions
I (and many other artists, at least in the UK) made is about changes in the
economics of experimental creative practice. One assumes this system will
change again. You need to be adaptable, just like your work.

Perhaps what we need is not a variable media fund but a variable artist
fund?

Best

Simon


Simon Biggs

[log in to unmask]  [log in to unmask]  Skype: simonbiggsuk
http://www.littlepig.org.uk/
Research Professor  edinburgh college of art  http://www.eca.ac.uk/
Creative Interdisciplinary Research into CoLlaborative Environments
http://www.eca.ac.uk/circle/
Electronic Literature as a Model of Creativity and Innovation in Practice
http://www.elmcip.net/



From: Jon Ippolito <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: Jon Ippolito <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 02:55:37 -0400
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: [NEW-MEDIA-CURATING] Models of variable media acquisition


An artist all too willing to sacrifice the historical and aesthetic
specificity of particular equipment might strike a conservator as a sellout,
and sometimes rightly so. Maybe the variable media paradigm has reinforced
this reprehensible behavior. But I have to say, as an artist active on the
Internet in the 1990s, my work never *had* a particular medium. My
collaborators and I knew our Web sites would be seen in Netscape and
Internet Explorer, on screens small and large, in millions of colors or only
256, over T1 lines and over 2400 baud modems. (I'm guessing Simon Bigg's
with me on this one.)


3. For the budget of its 2002 online art commissions (Mark Napier's net.flag
and John Simon's Unfolding Object), the Guggenheim took 15 percent and put
it in a variable media endowment. The interest from that endowment over time
was supposed to build up and supply a fund to pay programmers to re-create
(say) net.flag in a post-Java version, or to update the flags it referred to
to match the geopolitical realities of the year 2050. As far as I could
tell, this practice *hasn't* survived well--but I still think there's a
strong case to be made for it.

Cheers,

jon


Edinburgh College of Art (eca) is a charity registered in Scotland, number SC009201

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager