JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for LIS-LINK Archives


LIS-LINK Archives

LIS-LINK Archives


LIS-LINK@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

LIS-LINK Home

LIS-LINK Home

LIS-LINK  March 2010

LIS-LINK March 2010

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Subject Librarians in back rooms

From:

Laval Hunsucker <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Laval Hunsucker <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sat, 6 Mar 2010 07:14:16 -0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (536 lines)

I appreciate your posting, Steve, which I read with 
much interest and pleasure. 

I agree with many of your points, and recognize in 
them, as well, some of our less fortunate developments 
at the university library in Amsterdam over the last 
twenty-five years.

Let me just add that in our case there was another 
important factor involved ( though hardly anyone in 
the organisation was eager to acknowledge it, not to 
mention to discus it ). That factor was a question of 
mentality -- a clearly broadly shared mentality -- 
among the Public Services staff, a kind of resentment 
accompanied by what seemed almost a pathological 
inferiority complex vis-à-vis the subject-specialist 
librarians, many of whom had higher degrees, and 
not a few indeed doctorates, in their respective 
disciplines. 

It's actually many years ago now that the subject 
specialists largely lost the battle for systematic direct 
contact with the general library-using public, 
manifested for example by regular service at the 
enquiry desks. I've the strong impression that the 
Public Services employees were in majority quite 
happy and relieved to see us manoeuvred to the 
sidelines or entirely behind the scenes. Later on, 
especially the "team-leaders" among them even 
became more aggressive in claiming for themselves 
( with support from higher management ) prerogatives 
that actually served to hinder an optimal -- or even 
sufficient -- subject-expertise-based library service 
to students, faculty members and other researchers 
or the general public. 

There are more than sufficient indications that quite 
a few of that front-line staff actually began to convince 
( delude ? ) themselves that they themselves had the 
necessary knowledge and general intellectual baggage 
to handle most subject-specific enquiries themselves ;  
and when they eventually saw that they were really 
clearly at a loss, they would refer the user to a real 
specialist but accompany the referral with an explicit 
or implicit commentary to the effect that "this referral 
doesn't necessarily mean that you're any better or more 
clever or informed than I am, but just maybe you can 
think of something to help this person that hasn't 
already occurred to me" -- something with that general 
drift.

Of course this has something to do with the Dutch 
character or psyche as it has developed especially over
the last forty years -- but that's just a ( minor ? ) part of 
the equation, I think.

It's my own feeling that this situation could amount to 
a reasonably good research topic for a social or 
organisational psychologist. Of course such studies have 
been done, but I can't think off-hand of a reference to 
a relevant one in the library area, and don't have access 
at the moment to the tools for checking thoroughly.

The library management is of course afraid to tackle the 
problematics of the situation sketched above, indeed 
even to take their existence seriously. That stance is, as a 
matter of fact, inherently related to the endorsement, also 
in Amsterdam, of what you so nicely term ""Customer 
Service" Management Techniques".

A sign of the times. Not something you can do a whole 
lot about, it seems to me. Enlisting the users ( especially 
students and faculty ) in your cause can be effective, but 
is a tricky business, one that can also backfire.


 - Laval Hunsucker
  Breukelen, Nederland




----- Original Message ----
From: Lee S R (LCSS) <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Sat, March 6, 2010 12:26:08 PM
Subject: Re: Subject Librarians in back rooms

This is something that is being tried at the University of Glamorgan at
the present time in the main Library, although the model proposed is not
exactly the same in that Information Librarians (Subject) are already
located in offices off the main library floor, but they did until last
year have regular slots where they served on enquiry desks and were
therefore available to directly face their users regularly without any
barriers. Similarly if someone on the enquiry desk received an enquiry
for a Librarian they could ring them to speak to the student involved.
E-mail and Phone have always been methods promoted here.



I have to say that the views I am about to express are mine and mine
alone and may well not reflect the views of other Librarians or the
Library Management at Glamorgan.



I am not sure what the purpose of this move is other than it may be
following on from the change of practice in the Netherlands or the USA
and particularly the University of Hertfordshire who I think pioneered
this approach in the UK, although I may be wrong.



As a trained Youth and Community worker, before becoming a librarian, it
is obvious to me that we should be taking every opportunity to meet and
work alongside our community of staff students and researchers, and not
move further away. Thus these moves which, as far as I can see, make it
much more difficult for the users to get access to Librarians and
therefore hopefully get an instant answer to their query are a
retrograde step. 



I may be wrong but this seems to me to be a response to so called
"Customer Service" Management Techniques, where a call comes in and gets
logged and is then forwarded on to someone to deal with at some time and
some predefined way by priority profiles. 



The idea of "Customer Service" where you actually help the customer
there and then to resolve their problem by sitting alongside them and
facilitating their learning so that they gain extra skills, Seems to me
to be dyeing and we as Librarians are either just letting this happen
are having this foisted on us with very little consultation and thus
have no choice in the matter.



What I am sure of is that if you remove help from where it is needed you
get less enquires. Years ago there was a move in many Libraries to take
subject enquiry desk of different library floors and to put them in one
big enquiry desk near the entrance. There was a huge drop off in
enquires as a result I seem to remember, because the Help Desk staff
were then separated from the book stock. 



Since the current experiment with removing Librarians from the main help
desk and putting them in a room behind the Information and Service desk
(Issue), once again the enquires seem to have dropped off quite
drastically. This maybe because we are no longer be asked "can I borrow
a stapler" or "where are toilets" but I personally think that users
often require courage to approach a library desk in the first place and
therefore are not prepared to go through another layer of bureaucracy to
get to us. They just go away and use Google or someone else. We now
monitor our enquires and some colleagues have had some enquiry sessions
where they have had no enquires at all.



On a more positive note Glamorgan has promoted "Roving" on all library
floors, where Library workers wear a Bib saying "Library Staff Ask Me"
on it. In my opinion this has been a very good development as students
can now often find a member of staff roving near the bookstack they are
in and ask for their help. This has to some extent I think has offset
the negative effects of taking the Librarians of the Help desk.



The reason I am taking the trouble to reply in this detail is because I
think we should be having a wide ranging debate across the profession
about how we best serve our users and I think we as Librarians should be
setting this agenda rather than having it foisted on us by management
gurus or whoever is responsible.



To be fair to the management at Glamorgan they are evaluating the
current project and so it may yet be changed. They have also been very
supportive of moves I have made to actually go out into the University
Departments to make up for the users having access to me in the Library.



They have supported me in setting up 4 weekly one Hour Clinics in each
of the Departments in my Faculty where I now sit in prominent Student
areas in each of our main Academic Buildings and deal with enquires
there from staff, students and researchers. 



This has for me been a wonderful experience as members of the academic
staff stop and chat as they pass and sometimes even bring me a cup of
tea. It has made me feel much more part of the department. We have
promoted these sessions on Plasma Screens around all the departments
involved, thanks to some eye catching posters and matching PowerPoint
slides for the Plasma screens done by our excellent in house Graphic
Designer. 



Although I am not buried in enquires during these sessions I have always
had at least one or two very detailed ones, and I have also been able to
promote our whole range of services much more readily. 



This is where I personally think the future of Librarianship should go
if we are to survive and be truly valued by our users/customers. If we
become less and less accessible and approachable and do not set foot
outside our Libraries but expect our community to come to us then one
day people will ask why are we paying these people quite a lot of money?
What do they actually do? 



It should be absolutely clear what we do! We should be at the heart of
every information innovation happening on our campuses and not let these
developments be taken of us by other departments. 



A Community Work approach needs to be the way forward not a "Customer
Service" managed approach, like you get in call centres and which
frustrates the hell out of all of us.



Later next academic year I hope to write up more about my work in the
Departments and this Community Work approach, (in the SCONUL newsletter)
but in the meantime I would be happy to provide more information to
anyone who e-mails me.



Having got involved in this debate, instigated by Shirley, I hope others
from all sides of this issue will join in and let us air all the
possible views and see we can reach any consensus on the way forward.

Thanks

Steve

Steve Lee 

BA (Hons) MLib PGCE CQSW FLA exFCLIP FHEA

Information Librarian 

Science Sport and Chiropractic

LRC 

University of Glamorgan

Pontypridd

Mid-Glam

CF37 1DL

Tel 01443 483391

e-mail [log in to unmask]

"...all progress depends on the unreasonable man" G B Shaw

"There is NO higher life form than a Librarian" T. Pratchett, J Cohen &
I. Stewart, The Science of Discworld II, p 10. 2002 



Please join me and visit



http://www.thehungersite.com

and

http://www.freerice.com/



ONCE EVERYDAY to give food to the hungry at no cost to you.



(and if you can spare the time please click on the TABS on the
www.hungersite.com link to give free donations to Breast Cancer, Rain
Forests Animals etc.)



Please help MAKE POVERTY HISTORY !!!!!!

visit



www.traidcraftinteractive.com 



Please change a life by Sponsoring a child by going to either of the
sites below and picking a child. (It does not cost alot)

www.compassionuk.org

www.worldvision.org.uk 





------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
From: A general Library and Information Science list for news and
discussion. on behalf of Laval Hunsucker
Sent: Fri 05/03/2010 16:35
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Subject Librarians in back rooms


Shirley,

The change being considered at your institution
is one that was less than three years ago, and
quite controversially, implemented at the
University Library at the Universiteit Leiden here
in The Netherlands. There was much discussion,
as even I could not avoid noticing and to some
extent following, as then ( now just retired )
subject specialist at the Universiteit van
Amsterdam ( where we ourselves had and still
have a de facto 'mixed model' in this respect ).

They carried out a study and produced a report
prior to the actual implementation in Leiden, as I
recall, and perhaps even did an evaluation later
on. ( Whether these things would be available in
English is another matter. )

You may want to contact that library for further
enquiries. Their English-language website is at

http://www.library.leiden.edu/,

and you can find links for descriptions and contacts
on

http://www.library.leiden.edu/about/.


Good luck,


- Dr. Laval Hunsucker
   Breukelen, Nederland




----- Original Message ----
From: "Ward, Shirley" <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Fri, March 5, 2010 9:41:47 AM
Subject: Subject Librarians in back rooms

Here at the University of Bolton, there has been a suggestion that the
team of Subject Librarians should be taken off the Library floor, and
live in a back office.
Students would be able to contact their respective librarian via phone
and email, and make appointments to see them if necessary.
We would still be rostered on to the general Information Desk during the
week, but it is envisaged that 'subject' queries would be referred from
that desk, when they arise.
At present each Librarian has a desk in the Library and is available for
queries at all times (when they are at those desks)

I would appreciate some information from institutions who have their
subject librarians in back offices, and those who haven't - particularly
if you have tried both scenarios.
Which approach do you think works best, which do the students prefer,
and any advice that you would be willing to give.

I will, of course, summarise answers to the list if anyone is
interested.

Best wishes

Shirley


Shirley Ward
Subject Team Leader/Learning and Teaching Fellow
University of Bolton
The Library
Deane Road
BOLTON
BL3 5AB
01204 903553



    


Steve Lee 
BA (Hons) MLib PGCE CQSW FLA FCLIP FHEA
Information Librarian 
Applied Sciences
LRC 
University of Glamorgan
Pontypridd
Mid-Glam
CF37 1DL
Tel 01443 483391
e-mail [log in to unmask]
"...all progress depends on the unreasonable man" G B Shaw
"There is NO higher life form than a Librarian" T. Pratchett, J Cohen &
I. Stewart, The Science of Discworld II, p 10. 2002 

Please join me and visit

http://www.thehungersite.com
and
http://www.freerice.com/

ONCE EVERYDAY to give food to the hungry at no cost to you.

(and if you can spare the time please click on the TABS on the
www.hungersite.com link to give free donations to Breast Cancer, Rain
Forests Animals etc.)

Please help MAKE POVERTY HISTORY !!!!!!
visit

www.traidcraftinteractive.com 

Please change a life by Sponsoring a child by going to either of the
sites below and picking a child. (It does not cost alot)
www.compassionuk.org
www.worldvision.org.uk 

-----Original Message-----
From: A general Library and Information Science list for news and
discussion. [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Laval
Hunsucker
Sent: 05 March 2010 16:36
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Subject Librarians in back rooms

Shirley,

The change being considered at your institution 
is one that was less than three years ago, and 
quite controversially, implemented at the 
University Library at the Universiteit Leiden here 
in The Netherlands. There was much discussion, 
as even I could not avoid noticing and to some 
extent following, as then ( now just retired ) 
subject specialist at the Universiteit van 
Amsterdam ( where we ourselves had and still 
have a de facto 'mixed model' in this respect ).

They carried out a study and produced a report 
prior to the actual implementation in Leiden, as I 
recall, and perhaps even did an evaluation later 
on. ( Whether these things would be available in 
English is another matter. )

You may want to contact that library for further 
enquiries. Their English-language website is at 

http://www.library.leiden.edu/,

and you can find links for descriptions and contacts 
on

http://www.library.leiden.edu/about/.


Good luck,


- Dr. Laval Hunsucker
   Breukelen, Nederland




----- Original Message ----
From: "Ward, Shirley" <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Fri, March 5, 2010 9:41:47 AM
Subject: Subject Librarians in back rooms

Here at the University of Bolton, there has been a suggestion that the
team of Subject Librarians should be taken off the Library floor, and
live in a back office.
Students would be able to contact their respective librarian via phone
and email, and make appointments to see them if necessary.
We would still be rostered on to the general Information Desk during the
week, but it is envisaged that 'subject' queries would be referred from
that desk, when they arise.
At present each Librarian has a desk in the Library and is available for
queries at all times (when they are at those desks)

I would appreciate some information from institutions who have their
subject librarians in back offices, and those who haven't - particularly
if you have tried both scenarios.
Which approach do you think works best, which do the students prefer,
and any advice that you would be willing to give.

I will, of course, summarise answers to the list if anyone is
interested.

Best wishes

Shirley


Shirley Ward
Subject Team Leader/Learning and Teaching Fellow
University of Bolton
The Library
Deane Road
BOLTON
BL3 5AB
01204 903553 


      

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager