On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 05:51:16PM +0000, Pete Johnston wrote:
> > ACTION: Pete to suggest one or two points from [1] to add
> > to the draft HTML-WG feedback statement. Specifically, the
> > statement seems to be limited to issues around "a mechanism
> > to encode RDF triples using <meta> and <link> elements".
> > There should be an extra sentence making clear that DCMI's
> > interest in syntax is not limited to <meta> and <link>.
> >
> > Manu also suggests we take the opportunity to make clear
> > that Dublin Core is not just about describing documents
> > (a common perception), but in principle any other type of
> > creative work.
> >
> > After revision, Tom will submit the statement with a short
> > cover letter citing [1], which discusses various issues in more
> > detail than the draft statement and which some members of the
> > WG may be interested to read.
> >
> > [1] https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=ind1003&L=DC-
> > ARCHITECTURE&P=1429
>
> I think the other suggestion was that the statement submitted _should_ make
> some specific comment about @profile, even if that comment was to the effect
> that DCMI would not depend on the presence of @profile in HTML5?
Yes, agreed. Can you perhaps suggest a comment as part of your
action?
Tom
--
Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]>
|