JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for QUAL-SOFTWARE Archives


QUAL-SOFTWARE Archives

QUAL-SOFTWARE Archives


QUAL-SOFTWARE@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

QUAL-SOFTWARE Home

QUAL-SOFTWARE Home

QUAL-SOFTWARE  February 2010

QUAL-SOFTWARE February 2010

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: NVivo 8 Training and Consulting - and other software

From:

Ann Lewins <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

qual-software <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 14:24:59 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (65 lines)

Just as an aside - Trevors' original question  to Fiona Wiltshire (a long time member of  QSR, the company which makes NVivo)- 'which is best NVivo or ATLAS.ti?' - was a bit like asking Bill Gates which he thought the better platform - Windows or Apple Mac.   Fantastic as she is as an exponent of NVivo - she took the tactful route and didn't respond publicly - unless I missed it.


There are some general... and possibly sweeping statements below. focusing mainly on the handling of text  - (with a bit of quant) and I echo everything that's been said so far by Ross, Silvana and Paul... 

ATLAS.ti  - is a 'QUALITATIVE' tool - its user interface is tidy and spacious and you feel like it's a more open interface than the others somehow - it may not have been created with grounded theory in mind (I used to think it was but apparently this is not so) - but even so it keeps you very close to the data if you want to be - and all the lists you want to be visible can be visible at the same time - along with the text. Its codes margin prints out easily next to the text. It's incredibly easy to get started but later on things might get a little more difficult because of the architecture of the software. Its not designed to provide maximum flexibility when handling more quantitative data - e.g. open ended questions have to be organized into documents which represent a single respondent or case. Then you can integrate quant data OK and use query tool in this context later,  but the quant info is very much in the background. As my colleague Graham Hughes pointed out to me in an illuminating moment - you  can't for instance view the quant style data in a handy table inside the software - I'd never even noticed  (this says something about how immersed you become in what a software CAN do rather than what it can't) - and Silvana Paul and Ross have each said something of the sort in different ways... and you don't necessarily need a software to do absolutely everything.

MAXqda is a nice easy qualitative instrument -  the visibility simultaneously of all the working panes with the important lists (code lists, sets, documents lists, document text, segments and codes flexibly showing in margin  (& all printable)   makes for an intuitive tool. The software is geared up to handle the quantitative aspects of qualitative data with the minimum of fuss (if you've got that sort of info). Instant comparative textual info is available across subsets and variables at a couple of clicks - not replicated as easily in any of the others. You might not actually need a Query tool to ask further complicated questions, but it's there if you want it. but its not endlessly flexible. Its got some great ways of giving you overviews  of what's going on in your work with two clicks (e.g. interactive lists of codings and memos)- altogether very slick indeed.

As Paul Dempster suggested NVIVo follows the Microsoft route. and as with Outlook it breaks up functions and lists into different windows. moving about the functions is intuitive if you are an Outlook user, but in itself that's a difficult aspect when you are still a bit uncomfortable with the software because you never seem to have the right list on view for the thing you want to do NOW. Though the codes margin display is interestingly flexible in what you can choose to see - you have to keep switching it on - and amazingly you can't very effectively print it out on the same sheet of paper as the text. But its query tool IS endlessly flexible - though slightly difficult to familiarize with. If you have quant data about qual data theres a lot more fuss and decisions which have to be made about data preparation, and how data is organized and laid out  (especially for open ended questions) but if you get all that right - its pretty hot stuff when you get as far as the Query tool. 


Under the umbrella of the CAQDAS Networking project at the moment we have another project underway - Qualitative Innovations in CAQDAS (QUIC)  - which is looking at how various packages handle the integration of various types of data - quant - visual and geo 'stuff'.  A lot of step by step stuff is being produced and will eventually be put online 
(see what is coming and watch this space http://caqdas.soc.surrey.ac.uk  ).  Also necessarily a lot more comparative detail will be included in the online resource... Graham Hughes for instance is producing a huge amount of discussion and step by step papers which will help researchers make decisions about the integration of quant data into CAQDAS and I have him to thank for making me 'see' things from different perspectives.    

Regards
Ann

Ann Lewins
Qualitative Innovations in CAQDAS (QUIC)
CAQDAS Networking Project
Dept of Sociology, University of Surrey
GUILDFORD  GU2  7XH,  UK
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The QUIC project is funded by the UK ESRC under the National             Centre for Research Methods programme
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
[log in to unmask]    
[log in to unmask]

http://caqdas.soc.surrey.ac.uk  
________________________________________
From: qual-software [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ross Perkins
Sent: 01 February 2010 20:58
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: NVivo 8 Training and Consulting

Any claim of "intuitiveness" is highly subjective .. If one has previously used NVivo (say, v. 7), then its interface is more "intutive" than Transana's or any other. Personally, I find Atlas.ti's UI to be convoluted, but I am sure it is simply because I have not spent enough time with it.

To Trevor's original question - and what many have hinted at already - is that the answer to which CAQDAS offering is "better" is, in all honestly, "It depends." It depends on type of data, format, time you have, qualifications of the research time, budget, anticipated results, and so on. If half 

Regarding Atlas.ti vs. NVivo, I will say that if one is doing much work with PDF documents, then Atlas is the way to go. NVivo chokes on even modest image-based PDF files, and its attempt to convert text-based PDF files results in a total mess.

Otherwise, I like NVivo quite a bit and once one gets used to the terminology, its fine.

Many lists of qualitative analysis software exist, but here's mine should anyone find it useful...

https://sites.google.com/site/caqdasplant/varieties

Cheers,

- Ross


-- 
Ross A. Perkins, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor, Educational Technology
Department of Educational Technology
Boise State University

1910 University Dr. MS 1747
Boise, ID 83275

Phone: 208-426-4875
Skype: ross.perkins.bsu 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager