Hmmmm......do they call them fig newtons in England?
2010/1/18 Angel Robert Marquez <[log in to unmask]>
> newtonian ones
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Patrick McManus <
> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > Is it based on figs?
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Poetryetc: poetry and poetics [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
> > Behalf Of Angel Robert Marquez
> > Sent: 18 January 2010 21:33
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: double moves
> > i made that one up.
> > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Patrick McManus <
> > [log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > > figmentational dialysis?
> > > I love all this does it have meaning?
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Poetryetc: poetry and poetics [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> > > Behalf Of Angel Robert Marquez
> > > Sent: 18 January 2010 02:10
> > > To: [log in to unmask]
> > > Subject: Re: double moves
> > >
> > > your imagination is a figment of its self. trying to bottle it up and
> > > tribally communicate it does the concept an injustice. i think the
> > approval
> > > you seek is self organizing. the attempt to explain it to persuade
> > > the
> > > intent more than making your claim more concrete. it's a learned
> > behavior.
> > > i
> > > understand you and want to, what else is there? but someone who does
> > > understand or care to understand will never understand. it's why we are
> > all
> > > dying. what is your main point you want me to take away from this? art,
> > > intent, perception.... figmentational dialysis? what is more important:
> > > seeing it my way or your way or understanding each other and finding a
> > > common ground that does not offend or cross lines of common sense?
> > > sense is more fuzzy than any logic i've ever encountered, sure, it's
> > > fine and dandy when you read it to yourself; but, once you start share
> > > mode...the desirable result is relative to the climate.
> > >
> > > On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 12:19 AM, Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sat, 2010-01-16 at 01:55 -0800, Angel Robert Marquez wrote
> > > > > a signal is a signal
> > > >
> > > > The problem here is it assumes innate multiple redundancies which
> > > > down the freedom of the imaginative text and imaginative image and
> > limit
> > > > the double only to a foreclosed already stated future which governs
> > also
> > > > the image as a narrative of fore-shadowing and back-shadowing, which
> > > > also Gary Saul Morson's side shadowing argument against, in his
> > > > of Bakhtin.
> > > >
> > > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> > > Version: 8.5.432 / Virus Database: 270.14.147/2628 - Release Date:
> > 01/17/10
> > > 07:35:00
> > >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> > Version: 8.5.432 / Virus Database: 270.14.149/2630 - Release Date:
> > 07:35:00