JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Archives


MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Archives

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Archives


MEDIEVAL-RELIGION@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Home

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Home

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION  January 2010

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION January 2010

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Third Impressions: Pfaff - The Liturgy in Medieval England: A History

From:

Susan Ridyard <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

medieval-religion - Scholarly discussions of medieval religious culture <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 3 Jan 2010 06:22:39 -0600

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (165 lines)

medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval religion and culture

>John

I don't have a horse or any other animal in this race, but I'm sure 
I'm not alone in finding the tone of these remarks somewhat 
offensive. Pfaff is a distinguished scholar who has obviously written 
a substantial work; it may have some errors, as most works inevitably 
do; but it surely deserves to be treated with more professional 
objectivity and less relentless sarcasm.

Sue

>medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval religion and culture
>
>Another change of gear: the last 250 pages consist of five chapters 
>on the secular Uses and a final concluding chapter. Picking up the 
>story of the secular Uses at about 1100 after 200 pages on the 
>monastic Uses (!), we have three chapters on the Sarum Use, with one 
>on Exeter (don't ask!) and another on the other Uses.
>
>The three chapters on the Sarum Use seem much more like a coherent 
>history. Not that it actually is, of course.  It's the familiar 
>story of manuscripts, saints and modern editions. There are curious 
>errors: a reference (p.373) to Frere using the same alphabetical 
>sigla for his editions of the Sarum consuetudinary and customary, 
>despite them referring to different manuscripts (yes, but the sigla 
>for the customary are in bold, and a different typeface!); the 
>reference (p.426n) to an incomplete edition of the Sarum antiphonal 
>in 1519 (a reference on p.549 to the "sole edition" of the 
>antiphonal in 1519-20 gives the correct answer); a curious belief 
>that the Sarum Processional of 1508 (edited by Henderson) was the 
>first printed one - calamitous on p.549 when an argument is 
>constructed upon it (even from my bed I can clearly see that the 
>facsimile edition has "1502" on the spine! The mistake must arise 
>from a touching reliance on Dickinson's "List of Printed Service 
>Books" of 1850: Pfaff does make use of Wordsworth's "Ceremonies and 
>Processions of the Cathedral Church of Salisbury" ["Edited from the 
>fifteenth century MS no. 148, with additions from the cathedral 
>records, and woodcuts from the Sarum processionale of 1502", 1901] 
>which should have given him a clue, but not of Bailey's "The 
>Processions of Sarum and the Western Church" [1971] - the name 
>"Terence Bailey" occurs neither in the index nor the 
>acknowledgments).
>
>Pfaff continues to trip himself up over bibliographical and 
>biographical issues. On p.425 he writes: "As early as 1842-43 
>Charles Seager published two fascicules of a proposed edition of the 
>Sarum Book" [the Sarum Breviary] "but apparently lost interest after 
>his conversion to Roman Catholicism in the latter year." Well, no. 
>The fascicle published in 1843 was the second edition (actually a 
>re-issue with considerable added matter and a new title page) of the 
>the first fascicle of 1842. The second fascicle was published in 
>1855.
>On the next page, discussing the Procter and Wordsworth edition, he 
>writes (p.426n): "the patience of the Cambridge University Press may 
>have been wearing thin." Is it fanciful to suggest that he is 
>projecting his own experience onto the 19th century?
>
>The Exeter chapter concludes with a reference: "Frere, p.70, citing 
>pp.10-11 of H.E. Reynolds's edition of the Exeter Chapter Acts, a 
>book unavailable to me." Well, it's not unavailable to me: I have 
>Christopher Wordsworth's copy!
>
>Chapter 14, "Regional Uses and local variety" is much more 
>satisfactory. The brief account (pp.445-462) of the York Use is a 
>model of clarity. Unfortunately, here we have a comparison: in 2008, 
>Matthew Cheung Salisbury published as Borthwick Paper 113 "The Use 
>of York: Characteristics of the Medieval Liturgical Office in York." 
>An attempt to compare them shows that they can't be compared: they 
>are largely examining different manuscripts! Pfaff takes five saints 
>to be diagnostic of the York Use. Salisbury (who is only looking at 
>the Office) takes a different approach: he uses the Responsory 
>series to distinguish a group of York  Breviaries from Sarum 
>Breviaries adapted to the York Use. He identifies seventeen feasts 
>as peculiar to the York Use, but argues that they cannot be used as 
>a diagnostic tool.
>
>The discussion of the Hereford Use (pp.463-480) is satisfactory, if 
>somewhat limited. A trick is missed in discussing the St Paul's Use: 
>Pfaff wonders why that term is used instead of "London Use", but 
>doesn't consider why the cathedral is called "St Paul's Cathedral" 
>rather than "London Cathedral". A howler seems to be perpetrated on 
>p.481: he claims that the 10th century "Rule of St Paul's" was "an 
>adaptation of the Institutio Canonicorum of Amalarius of Metz" - I'm 
>pretty certain he doesn't mean either "Institutio Canonicorum" or 
>"Amalarius of Metz" - what actually means is somewhat opaque. Total 
>obscurity occurs on p.491: "Both in Sparrow Simpson's 1875 printing 
>of that register (itself still unpublished), and in the missal" - 
>what is it that is unpublished? Several of Simpson's publications 
>are cited, but his "Registrum" dates from 1873.
>
>Pfaff is (probably correctly) sceptical of the existence (ever) of 
>the Lincoln Use which he considers to be a reification of Cranmer's 
>preface to the Book of Common Prayer. Here he misses a couple of 
>tricks. First, he could have mention that the list of Uses in that 
>preface: "And whereas heretofore there hath been great diversity in 
>saying and singing in Churches within this Realm; some following 
>Salisbury Use, some Hereford Use, and some the Use of Bangor, some 
>of York, some of Lincoln;" differs from the list in the preamble to 
>the 1549 Act of Uniformity itself: "Where of long time there has 
>been had in this realm of England and in Wales divers forms of 
>common prayer, commonly called the service of the Church; that is to 
>say the Use of Sarum, of York, of Bangor, and of Lincoln;" Second, 
>he could have pointed out that the preface is itself highly 
>rhetorical (Pfaff himself points out on p.478 that the Sarum Use had 
>already been made uniform for the southern province) and is a free 
>translation of Cardinal Quignon's preface to his own reformed 
>Breviary!
>
>The section on "Liturgy in parish churches" is unsatisfactory: 
>unbelievably, Pfaff has difficulty defining a "parish church" 
>(p.509)!
>
>The last chapter "Towards the end of the story" is rather a rag-bag, 
>with subjects as diverse as the Bridgettines and printed service 
>books. This is done, of course, to avoid any suggestion of teleology 
>or whiggishness: as if it wasn't blindingly obvious (whatever Eamon 
>Duffy might say) that the Reformation was inevitable. A howler is 
>made in trying to strain a point that didn't need to be made at all 
>(in the context of printed breviaries for Abingdon and St Albans): 
>"The monks can scarcely have supposed that their choirs would soon 
>be bare, as at Abingdon, or ruined, as at St Albans." It's the other 
>way around, of course! (Pfaff's attempts to relate liturgy to 
>architecture are consistently painful.)
>
>Final conclusions to follow.
>
>John Briggs
>
>**********************************************************************
>To join the list, send the message: join medieval-religion YOUR NAME
>to: [log in to unmask]
>To send a message to the list, address it to:
>[log in to unmask]
>To leave the list, send the message: leave medieval-religion
>to: [log in to unmask]
>In order to report problems or to contact the list's owners, write to:
>[log in to unmask]
>For further information, visit our web site:
>http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/medieval-religion.html


-- 
Susan Ridyard
Professor of History
Director, Sewanee Medieval Colloquium
The University of the South
735 University Ave
Sewanee, TN 37383

tel. (931) 598 1531

**********************************************************************
To join the list, send the message: join medieval-religion YOUR NAME
to: [log in to unmask]
To send a message to the list, address it to:
[log in to unmask]
To leave the list, send the message: leave medieval-religion
to: [log in to unmask]
In order to report problems or to contact the list's owners, write to:
[log in to unmask]
For further information, visit our web site:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/medieval-religion.html

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager