JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CAPITAL-AND-CLASS Archives


CAPITAL-AND-CLASS Archives

CAPITAL-AND-CLASS Archives


CAPITAL-AND-CLASS@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CAPITAL-AND-CLASS Home

CAPITAL-AND-CLASS Home

CAPITAL-AND-CLASS  December 2009

CAPITAL-AND-CLASS December 2009

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: (C&C)RE: take a look at this

From:

"Lindsay, John M" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Lindsay, John M

Date:

Tue, 8 Dec 2009 11:30:14 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (94 lines)

I saw the newspaper reports on what had happened to the water, and the role of the electricity company which had opened its dam in order to release its problem, washing away most of a town in the process, and its declaration that it was not responsible, that it would do it again.  Somewhere I have the front page of the Irish paper in which it was reported.

This week was also the commemoration of Bhopal, in which a chemical company released noxious gases, to the disadvantage of a substantial population.

It was Bhopal which made me realise the real implications of planning, and that these things could be avoiced.

I was working in Vizag when they were planning the siting of the new steel works, and I was designing a MSc course for the university .

It seems to me now, as it did then, that the contradictory logics of the capitalist mode of production give space for revolutionaries to win arguments and make betterments and that these are opportunities we should seize.

It also gives us opportunities, in lists such as this, and perhaps in the associated journal with which it is attached, to hold onto histories, and establish stories, which may become part of an educational mainstream understanding which determine the conditions not of their own making in which people make history?

It is possible to be pessimistic, with the intellect, and optimistic, with the willie, so that when the employers want to make wage cuts an alternative to mass sackings, it is possible to organise a fight.  That sort of fight is a different one from the Mayor for London's integrated transport network consultation, or the siting of a dam for hydraulics power works, or the compensation to be paid when the water is released, which isn't quite the same matter as the breaches of the river.

I don't think discussions have to go, I think making notes and recording how connections fit together is worth doing in itself, and the new technology allows us new ways of doing this, including this list.  But this part of the discussion is off to discuss light rail with someone from the UITP.




________________________________________
From: To complement the journal 'Capital and Class' (ISSN 0 309 8786) [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Paul Stewart [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 08 December 2009 11:10
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: (C&C)RE: take a look at this

Where is this 'discussion' going?  Talk about cities.   Cork was under water and is still threatened by new breaches of the river Lee while 7,000 people are homeless in the Shannon basin and the IMF is on the brink of taking over the Irish economy demanding 6% cut in the pay of public sector workers.....while in the north of Ireland the only truly growing business is in the installation of new 'peace walls' or is it 'civil wars' as the new sectarian state 'flourishes'.  Presumably all those gombeen sharks who grew fat on the proceeds of their property building boom now gone bust are joyous at finding a new outlet for their over production of concrete and cement.  Belfast here we come!

And you cry...for what...

Paul
________________________________
From: To complement the journal 'Capital and Class' (ISSN 0 309 8786) [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Alan Freeman [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 07 December 2009 23:37
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: (C&C)RE: take a look at this

Guys, sorry, I can't resist this.

http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/18104/1/MPRA_paper_18104.pdf

City measurement is a new frontier. Cities do not define their boundaries by the same means as nations. They do not go to war, they do not make treaties. They do not, themselves, know where their limits lie. So, you have to think, before committing yourself to paper. You have to ask yourself 'actually, what do I mean by the word "London". Or the word "Paris". or the word (dear to my heart) "Glasgow". Or the word "Liverpool".

It is not as if nobody is thinking about the question of "where does the boundary of a city lie". Imagine how you would feel if somebody were to write "If the boundaries of Germany are changed, so it becomes a country of 120 million, is it simply the boundary change which makes the difference that makes the difference?"

So I plead with you, show respect. Think. Read, Don't just speculate. Cities are the future, but if you don't even stop to think what they are or how people that are engaged with them feel about what they belong to, what hope is there for rational discourse? In ancient history, wars were fought over who was a citizen of Athens, or Rome. In Mediaeval times, Florence, Milan, Venice were mercantile city-states in which military, agrarian, cultural and rhetorical spaces of ideas and materiality vied for hegemony. Is London any different today? People are studying the issue of "what city do I belong to" in great earnest and with much at stake. At least do them the elementary courtesy of reading what they have written.I understand the temptation to trivialise it,. but please do not succumb to it.
A





I try to.
A


Lindsay, John M wrote:
Why, one wonders?


Whereas taking a looking at the plan for Greater Paris, which is to be based on SuperTram, seems to me to raise something which is worth taking a look at, for some reason, one thinks of London as a wsorld city, whatever that means, because of its size.


If the boundaries of Paris are changed, so it becomes a city of 10 million, is it simply the boundary change which makes the difference that makes the difference?


Had Greater London not been formed, would one not have seen it?


But then there is the time, distance, price, for transport  and I suspect London was seen as soon as the railways existed.


Now the Mayor for London’s Integrated Tramsport Network might stand against Supertram in the contest for world city, but does that have anything to do with capital, and class?


From: To complement the journal 'Capital and Class' (ISSN 0 309 8786) [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Christian Garland
Sent: 07 December 2009 02:16
To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
Subject: take a look at this

I came accross this site stuggba.com , you'll thank me for finding it. spread the word.
________________________________
Use Hotmail to send and receive mail from your different email accounts. Find out how.<http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/186394592/direct/01/>
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security System.

This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security System.

This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security System.

This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security System.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager