Pushing the limit on AllStats rules (sorry moderator), the following is
concise and to the point. You will note that it is a precis from Analytic
Bridge, which I think gives it some clout.
For those who have access to the internet, the link at the end of this
letter completely disproves the association between the observed climate
change and emitted carbon. This is from reputable, published scientists.
Interesting, at a time when a group of scientists have been found to be
fudging the data because they did not fit.
For those who do not have access to the net, or are just happy to read on, I
will summarise key facts taken from the site.
1. If you're 29, there has been no global warming for your entire adult
life.
2. July 2007 US Senate trip to Greenland to investigate fears of a
glacier meltdown found that Greenland has been warming since the
1880's, but since 1955, temperature averages at Greenland stations have been
colder than the period between 1881-1955.
3. Also, Greenland has cooled since the 1940s, with 1941 being the
warmest year on record.
4. Vikings farmed this land during the mediaeval Warm Period.
5. 70% of the glaciers have been shrinking regularly since the end of the
1880's, while 80% of man-made CO2 emissions occurred after 1940.
6. The observed changes in weather are within natural variation (albeit
somewhat extreme).
To echo a recent Leicester Mercury editorial, how and why should so many
governments
have got it wrong ? This is the real question, not "Does CO2 cause climate
change ?"
Martin Holt
http://www.analyticbridge.com/main/search/search?q=climate+change
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kevin Kane" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 12:50 PM
Subject: Re: Analysis of temperature on Earth
> Hi,
>
> This is not my area of expertise, but if you look at the very informative
> graphs provided, there does seem to be a trend - specifically - before
> 1995 the global temperatures are lower, and after 1995 they seem to be
> higher. With the amount of random noise, if you imagine where the
> extrapolated line would head to, it would seem that you would need to
> consider forecasting out to 50-100 years to see a clear difference between
> current temperatures.
>
> Interesting...
>
> Kevin Kane
> CEO, PHASTAR
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Anatoly Zhigljavsky" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 9:45 AM
> Subject: Analysis of temperature on Earth
>
>
>> Dear allstat fellows,
>>
>> I though some of you might be interested in what I have done after I got
>> tired of listening about Global Warming and ClimatGate.
>>
>> I decided to check the data myself. The result is the following website:
>>
>> http://www.cf.ac.uk/maths/subsites/zhigljavskyaa/climatechange/
>>
>>
>> I did not find any signs of the Global Warming!
>>
>> Sorry, the statistical part in my short report is poor (this report is
>> not
>> for professional statisticians!)
>>
>> Any comments?
>>
>> Anatoly Zhigljavsky, Professor
>> Chair in Statistics
>> School of Mathematics
>> Cardiff University
>> CF24 4AG
>> Cardiff, UK
>>
>> Tel. +44(0)2029875076
>
|