JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for GEO-TECTONICS Archives


GEO-TECTONICS Archives

GEO-TECTONICS Archives


GEO-TECTONICS@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

GEO-TECTONICS Home

GEO-TECTONICS Home

GEO-TECTONICS  November 2009

GEO-TECTONICS November 2009

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Anderson Stress Meeting: September 2010 reminder

From:

Alan Gibbs <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Tectonics & structural geology discussion list <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:23:24 -0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (343 lines)

For those of you who may have missed these things have a look at: 

http://pgc.lyellcollection.org/content/6/133.abstract

More if you google "clastic injectites" which will give you some insight
into how big and potentially interesting these things are. 

Injectite or intrusion folks? 

alan

-----Original Message-----
From: Tectonics & structural geology discussion list
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jackson, Christopher A -
L
Sent: 26 November 2009 15:14
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Anderson Stress Meeting: September 2010 reminder

Hi All,

Seems like we are straying into a discussion about 'forcibly-intruded'
clastic dykes (typically injected upwards) vs. 'passively-emplaced' clastic
dykes which fill in long-lived, open fractures (i.e. ones forming in
metamorphic basement as Bob describes below). This is OK, as long as we are
al clear on what we are talking about.

Chris

P.S. Bob: I'll have one of the JSG pre-prints if you don't mind!


---------------------------------------------------------------
Dr Christopher A-L Jackson
Statoil Senior Lecturer in Basin Analysis Department of Earth Science &
Engineering Imperial College Prince Consort Road London
SW7 2BP
ENGLAND
 
email:  [log in to unmask]
web:    www.imperial.ac.uk/people/c.jackson
phone: +44(0)2075947450

-----Original Message-----
From: Tectonics & structural geology discussion list
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of HOLDSWORTH R.E.
Sent: 26 November 2009 14:35
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Anderson Stress Meeting: September 2010 reminder

Christine and all,

We here at Durham have had some interest in clastic infills in crystalline
rocks - including ones that have been injected. For example, try Beacom et
al. 1999 for examples within the Lewisian Gneisses:

Beacom, L.E., Anderson, T.B. & Holdsworth, R.E. 1999. Using basement hosted
clastic dykes as syn-rifting palaeostress indicators: an example from the
basal Stoer Group, Scotland. Geol. Mag. 136, 301-310.

I'll send you - and anyone else who want one - a reprint separately.

More recently, Rich Walker who has just submitted his PhD here has found
similar features in Tertiary basalts in the Faroe Islands and is about to
start a post doc studying equivalent features for a further 2.5 years funded
by a major oil company (contract pending, so i'll refrain from naming
names). If you want I can send a pre-print of a paper we are about to submit
to JSG on these, though they are mostly sediment fills with only minor
injectites. He will be presenting some of his work as a poster at AGU if you
want to come and find him or me.

Finally, we also have two PhD students funded by a consortium of companies
associated with the Clair field, west of Shetland who are studying fracture
systems in the crystalline basement of the Lewisian Complex of NW Scotland
(Jen Martin, Ben Franklin). Many of these fracture systems are associated
with clastic fills and/or injectites.
Jen will also be presenting some of her work as a poster at AGU. The
companies are interested in this work as a substantial volume of oil is
hosted in fractured basement in the Clair Field.

Fianlly, you might also want to seek out these possibly related papers:

Richter, D. 1966. On the New Red Sandstone Neptunian Dykes of the Tor Bay
Area (Devonshire). Proceedings of the Geological Association, 77,
173-186

Wright, V., Woodcock, N.H., Dickson, J.A.D. 2009. Fissure fills along
faults: Variscan examples from Gower, South Wales. Geological Magazine,
Cambridge

Best wishes

Best wishes
Bob Holdsworth

Prof Bob Holdsworth,
NERC KE Fellow,
Reactivation Research Group,
Dept of Earth Sciences,
University of Durham,
Durham DH1 3LE,
UK
Tel +44(0)1913342299
Fax +44(0)1913342301
e-mail (including jsg business): [log in to unmask]
Web: 
Dept: http://www.dur.ac.uk/earth.sciences
RRG - http://www.dur.ac.uk/react.res/RRG_web
Geospatial Research Ltd (GRL) - www.geospatial-research.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Tectonics & structural geology discussion list
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Christine Siddoway
Sent: 26 November 2009 13:39
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Anderson Stress Meeting: September 2010 reminder
Importance: High

Greetings, Carl and others,
AMS on sandstone intrusions:  Mike Petronis and I have an investigation
underway of sandstone dikes within crystalline rock in the Front Range of
Colorado. Our recent abstract with initial results is at:
http://aapg09.mapyourshow.com/2_1/sessions/session.cfm?ScheduledSessionI
D=15
32.  The scale of the intrusions, incidentally, is 5 cm to >7 meters, with
many exceeding 2 m in width.

I'd like to now ask, can any list members tell me of other examples of
clastic dikes within a crystalline host?  My web searches yield little!

Regards,
Christine Siddoway


On 11/26/09 4:24 AM, "Carl Stevenson" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> Sedimentary intrusions - does anyone know of any AMS (anisotropy of
magnetic
> susceptibility) work on these?
> 
> Desperately resisting getting drawn in to a semantic debate, I think
'igneous
> intrusion' is fine. I guess it is as opposed to igneous extrusion -
lavas and
> ash etc. Sometimes in when subvolcanic roots are exposed it is
actually
> equivocal. There are instances when ash can fall back into a vent.
> 
> An example I am aware of is:
> ALMOND, D. C. 1977. Sabaloka Igneous Complex, Sudan. Philosophical 
> Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series a - Mathematical
Physical
> and Engineering Sciences, 287, 595-633.
> 
> Cheers
> Carl
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tectonics & structural geology discussion list 
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Stu Clarke
> Sent: 26 November 2009 10:23
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Anderson Stress Meeting: September 2010 reminder
> 
> Don't you hate it when someone gets that email in just before
you......
> 
> I too have no particular stand on terminology, but I too was surprised
by
> the stated scale of sedimentary intrusions. I have examined large
scale
> sedimentary intrusions in deltaic settings and currently work with 
> colleagues using oil-industry datasets on the same thing. I don't
think
> sedimentary intrusions have to be small scale......
> 
> Stu
>  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tectonics & structural geology discussion list 
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Macdonald,
Professor
> David I. M.
> Sent: 26 November 2009 10:11
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Anderson Stress Meeting: September 2010 reminder
> 
> Dear Eric
> I have no particular stand on the terminology for igneous rocks, but
you are
> incorrect in your assertions on the scale of sedimentary intrusions.
Salt
> is a sedimentary rock which can be injected through kilometers of
strata in
> bodies hundreds of metres to kilometers across.  Anyone who has ever
worked
> on deltas can point to mud diapirism on a similar scale.  Even the
humble
> sand injection feature is much larger than you make out; your
description
> seems to be of sand filling pre-existing cracks, whereas most sand 
> injections are of a fluid slurry under pressure.  These intrusions can
be
> huge.  In the Mesozoic forearc basin of the Antarctic Peninsula,
sandstone
> dykes have been mapped with MINIMUM dimensions: 6 km long, cutting 350
m of
> strata, and 1 m wide.  For more examples, see, among other papers:
> 
> Hurst A. &  Cartwright J. A. Eds. 2007. Sand Injectites:  Implications
for
> hydrocarbon exploration and production.  Memoir 87 American
Association of
> Petroleum Geologists
> 
> Hurst A.,  Cartwright J. &  Duranti D. 2003.  Fluidization structures
in
> produced by upward injection of sand through a sealing lithology.  In:
> Subsurface sediment mobilization (eds. Van Rensbergen P.,Hillis
R.,Maltman
> A. J. & Morley,C.K.),  Geological Society Of London, London, 123-127
> 
> Jonk R., Hurst A., Duranti D., Mazzini A., Fallick A. E. &  Parnell J.
> 2005.The origin and timing of sand injection, petroleum migration and
> diagenesis: the Tertiary petroleum system of the South Viking Graben,
North
> Sea. AAPG Bulletin,  89,  329-357
> 
> Hurst A. &  Duranti D. 2004. Fluidisation and injection in the
deep-water
> sandstones of the Eocene Alba Formation (UK North Sea). Sedimentology,
51,
> 3,  503-529
> 
> Hope this helps
> David Macdonald
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tectonics & structural geology discussion list 
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Eric Essene
> Sent: 26 November 2009 07:39
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Anderson Stress Meeting: September 2010 reminder
> 
> Rob,
>     The term igneous intrusions is functionally a terrible term, a 
> distinction without a difference.  More than 99.9% (or more?) of the 
> time it means igneous rocks where the term is redundant.  If one talks 
> about sedimentary intrusions it is on a meter scale feature, commonly 
> even less--I have seen some down to cm scale.  When they formed and 
> well afterward they did not look like dikes, just fractures filled 
> with loose sediment.  I discount the poor term "sandstone dikes" as 
> needing yet another confusing term.
>      On the other hand salt domes are metamorphic (recrystallized) but 
> not molten rock, well a little brine.  They were not in the 
> sedimentary group during formation.  Yes, we have diapirs of 
> metamorphic rock, although a lot of those gneiss domes probably have a 
> little melt.  I would agree about metamorphic diapirs but simply would 
> not call them metamorphic intrusions to avoid confusion on a 
> transitional rock.  Gneiss domes are a nice description for them.
>      It must be exceedingly rare for igneous petrologists/geochemists
> to be presenting data on "sand dikes".   Salt domes are much larger
> but are as they form. Do you know of any igneous petrologist/ 
> geochemist who would report on them in your symposium?  So "sandstone 
> dikes" are fractures filled with loose clastic material and water, 
> salt diapirs are all metamorphic and may have brine, gneiss domes are 
> often partial melts then at least partly igneous, and the term 
> "igneous intrusion" is clearly redundant to the average passerby.  Is 
> this really a useful terminology?
> cheers,
> eric
> 
> On Nov 26, 2009, at 12:17 AM, Butler, Robert wrote:
> 
>> Eric
>> Actually - there are lots of non-igenous intrusions in basins - 
>> sandstone dykes through 100s metres of strata. Not to mention mud 
>> diapirs, salt etc etc.... gas chimneys....
>> go google!
>> Cheers
>> Rob
>> 
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Tectonics & structural geology discussion list
> [[log in to unmask]
>> ] On Behalf Of Eric Essene [[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: 26 November 2009 05:09
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: Anderson Stress Meeting: September 2010 reminder
>> 
>> Rob, Zoe, and all,
>>    Igneous intrusions as opposed to all those sedimentary plutons?
>> The phrase is nearly always meaningless and should not be used.
>>    Sounds like a great trip.
>> cheers,
>>  eric
>> 
>> 
>> On Nov 25, 2009, at 11:28 PM, Butler, Robert wrote:
>> 
>>> Dear all
>>> As we get our diaries together for 2010 we thought it timely to 
>>> remind you of the conference next year:
>>> 
>>> Stress controls on faulting, fracturing and igneous intrusion in the 
>>> Earth's crust
>>> 
>>> A meeting to commemorate the work of Ernest Masson Anderson on the 
>>> 50th anniversary of his death.
>>> 
>>> 6-8 September 2010 at the University of Glasgow, UK
>>> 
>>> Organisers: Zoe Shipton, Rick Sibson, Dave Healy, Rob Butler
>>> 
>>> We will send out details of the meeting ("First Circular") in 
>>> January - Abstract deadline will be end April with a preliminary 
>>> programme drawn up through May.
>>> We are also planning a fieldtrip to the Hebrides and NW Scotland to 
>>> examine a variety of faults and the Tertiary igneous complexes.
>>> Again - further information will be included in the first circular.
>>> 
>>> Hope to see a bunch of you in Scotland next September!
>>> Zoe, Rick, Dave and Rob.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The University of Aberdeen is a charity registered in Scotland, No 
>>> SC013683..
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The University of Aberdeen is a charity registered in Scotland, No 
>> SC013683..
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> The University of Aberdeen is a charity registered in Scotland, No
SC013683.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager