Ok, thank you very much! I think I will already succeed.
On Sun, 8 Nov 2009 13:14:20 +0000, Reza Salimi <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>hi,
>you can use *cluster* (to extract the clusters and their index numbers)
>and fslmaths (to threshold the index volume and keep the one you want)
>cheers
>
>
>2009/11/8 Gabor Perlaki <[log in to unmask]>
>
>> This is exactly what I want. Do you know some command which can I use to
>> keep count of the 2.3 clusters and split them into separate images?
>>
>> On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 08:37:22 +0000, Dave Flitney <[log in to unmask]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Does something like this do what you want?
>> >
>> >First split your 2.3 clusters into separate images.
>> >Multiply each 2.3 cluster image by the combined 3.1 clusters image and
>> >discard 2.3 cluster image if result empty, i.e., no common voxels.
>> >Re-combine all surviving 2.3 cluster images.
>> >
>> >Dave Flitney, IT Manager
>> >University of Oxford, FMRIB Centre
>> >JR Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU
>> >T: 01865 222713 F: 01865 222717
>> >
>> >On 7 Nov 2009, at 03:48, Gabor Perlaki <[log in to unmask]>
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> I think the problem is not solvable with a simple multiplication of
>> >> masks. I
>> >> would like to keep the clusters from the thresholding 2.3 which
>> >> contains at
>> >> least one voxel which is active in thresholding 3.1 as well. But I
>> >> would
>> >> like only these clusters from thresholding 2.3. I don't need
>> >> clusters which
>> >> are active in thresholding 2.3, but don't contain any voxels which are
>> >> active in thresholding 3.1. So I want to do a new map from clusters of
>> >> thresholding 2.3, which have seed with z>3.1.
>> >>
>>
>
>
>
>--
>G. Salimi-Khorshidi,
>D.Phil. Student, Dept. of Clinical Neurology, University of Oxford.
>[log in to unmask] http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~reza
>FMRIB Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital,
>Headington, Oxford, OX3 9DU
>Tel: +44 (0) 1865 222466 Fax: +44 (0)1865 222717
>
|