JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES Archives


CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES Archives

CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES Archives


CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES Home

CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES Home

CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES  November 2009

CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES November 2009

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Planning Conditions

From:

Rowan Devlin <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:40:48 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (194 lines)

Jason

We do use the model conditions, but apply them as one condition with 4 or 5
parts depending on the development, or just use whatever parts are relevant
and reword them slightly so they make sense.  Our Planners seem okay with
discharging these in parts.  As long as they are imposed correctly I don't
see a problem with covering each phase in one condition, because you can
still decide at any point whether you have enough information to discharge
it.    I do agree that they are a bit long-winded, but we haven't been
challenged yet.  We had some previous in-house conditions which essentially
asked for the same information, and were also quite wordy, but we were
happy to adopt one set of conditions from central government which
reflected up to date guidance and best practice and would hopefully improve
consistency.

We still have problems getting applicants to submit verification of cover
systems or gas protection measures though, which are obviously carried out
well after the development commences.

Regards

Rowan Devlin
Environmental Control Officer
East Riding of Yorkshire Council
Tel: 01482 396206
Fax: 01482 396104
http://www.pollution.eastriding.gov.uk


                                                                           
             "Bale, Jason"                                                 
             <[log in to unmask]                                             
             V.UK>                                                      To 
             Sent by:                  CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES@JISCMA 
             Contaminated Land         IL.AC.UK                            
             Management                                                 cc 
             Discussion List                                               
             <CONTAMINATED-LAN                                     Subject 
             D-STRATEGIES@JISC         Planning Conditions                 
             MAIL.AC.UK>                                                   
                                                                           
                                                                           
             13/11/2009 15:35                                              
                                                                           
                                                                           
             Please respond to                                             
               "Bale, Jason"                                               
             <[log in to unmask]                                             
                   V.UK>                                                   
                                                                           
                                                                           




Afternoon all,
Would appreciate some advice/ views on Planning Conditions, and in
particular the Standard Planning Conditions issued back in 2008 by the
CIEH DCLG

In Wales the Welsh Local Government Association, Welsh Assembly
Government  and Environment Agency Wales (WLGA/WAG/EAW)Land
Contamination Working Group  are looking at developing standard planning
conditions in a similar vein to those  detailed in the attached, for the
22 LA across Wales.

One of the issues that has come out of our recent discussions on these,
is the actual validity of the conditions and in particular the Site
Characterisation condition.
Recently one of the Welsh Authorities has had several planning appeals,
involving applications where CL conditions had been recommended. Most
recently the planning inspector considered that the condition that was
being proposed, which I am lead to believe was very similar to the Site
Characteristic condition, was prescriptive, unreasonable, onerous, too
long and, in the event that every stage of an investigation was not
necessary, unenforceable and technically impossible to discharge.  It
was explained that a short condition requiring the site to be
investigated and contamination addressed to the satisfaction of the LPA
would be suitable.  It was the responsibility of the officer to decide
and justify the point at which satisfactory information had been
provided etc.

In view of the above the CLO discussed our proposed Welsh standard
conditions with planning officers who considered that the same thing
applied to the proposed conditions.  Reference was made to Welsh Office
Circular 35/95 (Circular 11/95 for England - The Use of Conditions in
Planning), page 9, para 14.  It was the view that the conditions failed
the 6 tests set out in the document.

In light of the above WLGA/WAG/EAW Land Contamination Group are now
reconsidering the conditions to be adopted, and I was therefore seeking
the views of a wider audience on the standard conditions, in particular:

1. - do you use the standard conditions or similarly worded conditions
as the attached when conditioning planning apps;
2. - has your authority ever been challenged on the suitability of the
conditions
3. - do you agree with the planning inspectorate/ planners that the
standard conditions do not meet the 6 tests of Circulars 11/95 or
35/95).


Any views would be most welcome and apologies for such a long email on a
Friday afternoon.
Regards

Jason Bale

Group Leader/Arweinydd Grwp

Pollution Control Division/Rheoli Llygredd



Strategic Planning & Environment/Cynllunio Strategol a'r Amgylchedd.

Tel/Ffon: 02920 871 896

Fax/Ffacs: 02920 827 431

www.cardiff.gov.uk

P      Please consider the environment - Do you really need to print
this e-mail? Ystyriwch yr amgylchedd - Oes rhaid i chi brintio'r e-bost
hwn


-----Original Message-----
From: Contaminated Land Management Discussion List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Dave
Cooke
Sent: 13 November 2009 10:16
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: CLEA pH

Just bear in mind that the ingested soil will also undergo at least 2
major pH
changes on its journey through the ingestee, which sort of makes the
soil pH
less important for that pathway!

Regards

Dave Cooke

**********************************************************************
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If
you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for
delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this
message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly
notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your
employer does not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind.
Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not
relate to the official business of the Council of the City and County of
Cardiff shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.  All
e-mail sent to or from this address will be processed by Cardiff County
Councils Corporate E-mail system and may be subject to scrutiny by someone
other than the addressee.
**********************************************************************
Mae'n bosibl bod gwybodaeth gyfrinachol yn y neges hon. Os na chyfeirir y
neges atoch chi'n benodol (neu os nad ydych chi'n gyfrifol am drosglwyddo'r
neges i'r person a enwir), yna ni chewch gopio na throsglwyddo'r neges.
Mewn achos o'r fath, dylech ddinistrio'r neges a hysbysu'r anfonwr drwy
e-bost ar unwaith. Rhowch wybod i'r anfonydd ar unwaith os nad ydych chi
neu eich cyflogydd yn caniatau e-bost y Rhyngrwyd am negeseuon fel hon.
Rhaid deall nad yw'r safbwyntiau, y casgliadau a'r wybodaeth arall yn y
neges hon nad ydynt yn cyfeirio at fusnes swyddogol Cyngor Dinas a Sir
Caerdydd yn cynrychioli barn y Cyngor Sir nad yn cael sel ei fendith. Caiff
unrhyw negeseuon a anfonir at, neu o'r cyfeiriad e-bost hwn eu prosesu gan
system E-bost Gorfforaethol Cyngor Sir Caerdydd a gallant gael eu
harchwilio gan rywun heblaw'r person a enwir.
**********************************************************************
[attachment "DCLG letterconditioncontamination.pdf" deleted by Rowan
Devlin/CS/ERC]



**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. 

Please note that the East Riding of Yorkshire Council is able to, and
reserves the right to, monitor e-mail communications passing through
its network.

If you have received this email in error please notify our mail
manager at [log in to unmask]

Whilst every effort has been made to check for viruses in this e-mail
and any attachments, the Council does not warrant that it or they are
free of viruses. If in any doubt then please ask for the hard copy.
*********************************************************************E

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
November 1999
July 1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager