[log in to unmask] wrote:
> Hi again Jay,
> 2009/10/11 <[log in to unmask]>:
>> 2009/10/11 Jay Berkenbilt <[log in to unmask]>:
>>> Can you take a look at http://bugs.debian.org/549774? It looks like
>>> some kind of breakage because of a newer gtk or something.
> This is now fixed in trunk. The solution is:
> . . .
Should I try to extract a patch from svn, or will a new release be
forthcoming soon? I'd like to minimize the amount of time that debian
nip2 package has a release-critical bug filed against it.
> We've also landed the branch which uses libgoffice to draw plots, so
> there's yet another dependency, ouch.
Will applying the patch to fix the first problem pull in the new
dependency as well? Fortunately, libgoffice is already packaged for