Hi,
Thanks all for your answers.
And so with TOM I can't do this progressive generation, I must reprocess all
my subjects if I want to add one subject or I must use other way to create
my template.
Vincent
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 08:15:21 +0200, Marko Wilke
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>Hi Vincent,
>
>> I'm using the toolbox TOM and I work with children brains. So if I don't
make a
>> mistake I just average spatially normalised images.
>
>No you don't - you generate templates based on the statistical
>assesssment of a large sample (this is what we termed "radically
>different" approach to creating templates :)
>
>Either way, the problem remains: if you add subjects and want to add
>their influence to the template and use that to process them, this will
>be, in effect, a new study as you ue new reference data. The difference
>might be negligible, but will be there nonetheless. So in other words,
>you can either wait until you have all subjects and only process them
>then based on the final template or you process them at intermediate
>milestones, but will have to reprocess them in the end. I see no other
>way. Not sure if that was the question, though :)
>
>Marko
|