Dear Patrick,
The change is only there for Bruker experiments. It now reads the pulse
program file name, from the $PULPROG line in the acqus file, parses it,
and compares it with a mapping for standard type Bruker pulse program
names. When the name is in the mapping it just gives you the right
ExpPrototype (sometimes a couple of possibilities). Much simpler. When
there is no match it shows the window you are getting.
When that happens, you should set the Category to whatever the correct
calue is ('through-bond', through-space', 'other' ...) and take it from
there as you did previously. Pretty much as you were doing.
Another question is where the 'cp.av' pulse program name came from. Is it
the correct name of the pulse progam file? Is this a home-made sequence,
with a non-Bruker-standard name? What version is the Bruker file? Is that
indeed what it says in the $PULPROG line? What experiment should it be?
If this will be a regular occurrence we have provided for a user-specific
pulse program name mapping, so that you can enter your own local pulse
program names. It would have to be made functional, and it will not be
that easy to use, so we are waiting till we get requests before we
consider implementing it.
Hope this helps,
Rasmus
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Rasmus H. Fogh Email: [log in to unmask]
Dept. of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge,
80 Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1GA, UK. FAX (01223)766002
On Fri, 2 Oct 2009, Patrick van der Wel wrote:
> One more thing I noticed in v2.1. It seems that the experiment type system
> has been re-worked (improved??). However, it is not entirely clear to me how
> this should be used. By default it now selects a 'use external' category,
> which seems to mean that it used the pulse program name. This seems fine to
> me, but then I get the following popup (see below) regarding the lack of
> reference experiment types.
>
> From experimenting a bit, it seems that I have to select the 'other' category
> and then pick the traditional ref exp types, as before. Is this right? Why is
> it defaulting to the external one which does not seem to work? (Or am I doing
> something wrong?)
>
>
> Patrick
>
|