Many thanks Jane
Joy

-----Original Message-----
From: Caseload midwifery [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Sandall, Jane
Sent: 23 October 2009 09:33
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Evidence to support caseloading

Please find a poster Finlay,S. Sandall,J. Access, quality and safety in
maternity care; continuity counts, Poster, International Forum on
Quality and Safety in Health Care, Berlin 17-20 March 2009.
and
prsenting audit outcomes
Professor Jane Sandall
Professor of Women's Health
Programme Director (Innovations) NIHR King's Patient Safety and Service
Quality Research Centre


Department of Public Health Sciences

King's College London School of Medicine, 

Floor 7, Capital House, 42 Weston St

London SE1 3QD, UK

Tel: +44 (0)20 7848 6261/6604
e-mail:[log in to unmask]
http://www.kingspssq.org.uk/
http://myprofile.cos.com/sandall
<http://www.kcl.ac.uk/about/campuses/guys.html>  
 
________________________________

From: Caseload midwifery [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Jean Greer [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 22 October 2009 19:21
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Evidence to support caseloading


Hi Chris,
I am currently working on a poster presenting clinical outcomes from a
caseload team in Belfast and would love to see how you set yours out and
which outcomes you included.
Jean Greer
 
> Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:13:18 +0100
> From: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Evidence to support caseloading
> To: [log in to unmask]
> 
> hi all
> 
> in addition to the long reference list just posted, there are some 
> recent cohort studies which are not yet published. One was conducted 
> by Kings College London, and an article on the midwives' experience 
> was recently published from this: Finlay S and Sandall J, 2009, 
> 'Someone's rooting for you': Continuity, advocacy and street-level 
> bureaucracy in UK maternal health. Social Science & Medicine 69 (2009)

> 1228-1235
> 
> 
> We recently conducted a small cohort study of some inner city caseload

> practices, using a similar methodology. This is not yet published, or 
> the analysis completed, but we did present a poster at the Normal 
> Birth conference in June 2009. If anyone would like to see a copy of 
> the poster, which focuses on clinical outcomes, please let me know, 
> but bear in mind that it has not yet been written up properly or fully

> peer reviewed.
> 
> Chris
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Caseload midwifery on behalf of jude bradfield
> Sent: Wed 21-Oct-09 9:18 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Cc: 
> Subject: Re: Evidence to support caseloading
> 
> Hi Joy,
> 
> I agree with you about the research ... it is not very helpful. I have

> just done a return to practiee course and compared teams with 
> caseloading. I have a wealth of information related to the positive 
> effects on midwives and women, The albany teams in London are a good 
> practice to look at if you have not done so. Alternative countries 
> like Denmark with their high home birth rate. I am happy to forward 
> you the research documents that I found but you have probably looked 
> at them yourself anyway. You are also welcome to look at my document 
> which was done in the same way as a report if you like.
> 
> The government site for NHS NICE recommend case holding/loading over 
> and above teams as it has shown to have better outcomes for women and 
> babies. Surely the governments 'song' book is good enough to convince 
> the NHS.
> 
> Best wishes
> 
> Jude B.
> 
> 
> 
> Reference List
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Andrews. S, Brown. L, Bowman. L, Price. L andTaylor. R, Spring 2006.
> Caseload Midwifery: A Review, MIDWIFERY MATTERS, Issue No.108
> 
> 
> 
> Benjamin Y.
> <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=Search&Term=%2
> 2W 
> alsh%20D%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_Resu
> lt sPanel.Pubmed_DiscoveryPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstractPlus> Walsh D.
> <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=Search&Term=%2
> 2T 
> aub%20N%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_Resul
> ts Panel.Pubmed_DiscoveryPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstractPlus> Taub N. (2001) A

> comparison of partnership caseload midwifery care with conventional 
> team midwifery care: labour and birth outcome.
> <javascript:AL_get(this,%20'jour',%20'Midwifery.');> Midwifery.
> Sep;17(3):234-40
> 
> 
> 
> BirthChoiceUK (undated) Basic Maternity Statistics
> 
> http://www.birthchoiceuk.com/Frame.htm
> 
> 
> 
> Childbirth Connection (2002) Listening to Mother Survey. 
> 
> http://childbirthconnection.org/article.asp?ck=10397
> 
> 
> 
> Childbirth Connection (2006) Choosing a care giver: what are my
options?
> 
> 
> http://www.childbirthconnection.org/article.asp?ck=10163
> 
> 
> 
> Engelbrecht S. April, (2006) Motivation and Burnout in Human Service 
> Work, The Case of Midwifery in Denmark, Copenhagen.
> 
> 
> 
> DH (2006b) National Service Framework for Children, Young People and
> 
> Maternity Services: Case Studies Database
> 
> http://www.childrensnsfcasestudies.dh.gov.uk/children/nsfcasestudies.n
> sf
> 
> 
> 
> 
> DH (2007a) Maternity matters: choice, access and continuity of care in

> safe
> 
> services. London: The Stationery Office. 
> 
> 
> 
> Flint, C. (1986). `The Know Your Midwife Scheme'. Midwife, Health 
> Visitor and Community Nurse. Vol.22, pp. 168-169.
> 
> 
> 
> Kemp J, Sandall J, (2008), Normal birth, magical birth: the role of 
> the 36-week birth talk in caseload midwifery practice. 
> Midwifery:10.1016
> 
> http://www.albanymidwives.org.uk/albanymidwiveshomepage.php
> 
> 
> 
> Klein, M., Lloyd, L, Redman, C., Bull, M., Turnbull, A.C. (1983). A 
> comparison of low risk women booked for delivery in two different 
> systems of care. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 90,
pp.
> 118-128
> 
> 
> 
> Lester A (2005) The argument for caseload midwifery. MIDIRS 15(1)
27-30.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> HMSO (1959) Ministry of Health. Report of the Maternity Services 
> Committee. London: HMSO, (Cranbrook committee.)
> 
> 
> 
> NICE (2007), Intrapartum care of healthy women and their babies in 
> childbirth, London,National Institute for Clinical Excellence, NICE.
> 
> 
> 
> Nursing and Midwifery Council, (2004) Midwives Rules and Standards, 23

> Portland Place, London W1b 1PZ
> 
> 
> 
> Page.L.A, McCandlish,.R, (2006), The New Midwifery: science and 
> sensitivity in practice, Edition: 2, illustrated, Published by 
> Elsevier Health Sciences,
> 
> ISBN 0443100020, 9780443100024........
> 
> 
> 
> Peate I, Hamilton C, (2008) Becoming a Midwife in the 21st Century. 
> John Wiley and Sons, ISBN 0470065591, 9780470065594
> 
> 
> 
> HMSO, (1970) Peel Report, Standing Maternity and Midwifery Advisory 
> Committee, ?Domiciliary midwifery and maternity bed needs: report of a

> sub-committee,?London.
> 
> 
> 
> Reid. B. (2002). The Albany Practice, Midirs, Midwifery Digest, 12.1.
> 
> 
> 
> Tope. R, Dr Thomas E, Jones. M.E, (2008) Maternity Matters, Scoping of

> workforce models and best practice, Northwest NHS, UK. Also found at 
> http://www.northwest.nhs.uk/document_uploads/maternity_matters/HERC_As
> so
> ciates.pdf
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> World Health Organization. The Technical Working Group, Safe 
> Motherhood, Care of Normal Birth: A Practical Guide, Division of 
> Reproductive Health, 
> <http://www.who.int/reproductive%20health/publications/MSM_96_24/care_
> in
> _normal_birth_practical_guide.pdf>
> http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/MSM_96_24/care_in_n
> or
> mal_birth_practical_guide.pdf
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _____
> 
> From: Joy Kemp <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Sent: Wednesday, 21 October, 2009 14:45:18
> Subject: Evidence to support caseloading
> 
> I am helping a local Trust to develop a bid for monies for a new 
> midwifery caseloading project, to be set up in conjunction with a new 
> midwifery led birth centre.
> 
> I have done an initial literature search for the evidence to support 
> caseloading and it appears that there is much more out there on the 
> qualitative aspects, rather than the 'hard' evidence which may be 
> required to convince funders. I have found the Cochrane review, and 
> the discussion about this in 'Midwifery' - but if anyone knows of even

> more evidence that will help is make the case for caseloading I would 
> be very grateful.
> 
> Many thanks,
> 
> Joy Kemp, Senior Lecturer/Programme Director 78 week midwifery PLEASE 
> NOTE MY NEW PHONE NUMBER: 01634 894532 / Mobile 07740 649260
> Office: Room CCs14, second Floor, Cathedral Court (Compass Centre), 
> Medway Campus ME4 4UF Postal Address: Department of Health, Wellbeing 
> and the Family, Canterbury Christ Church University - Medway Campus 
> Cathedral Court, c/o 30 Pembroke Court Chatham Maritime, Kent ME4 4UF 
> Registered Company No: 4793659 Registered Charity No: 1098136


________________________________

Download Messenger onto your mobile for free. Learn more.
<http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/174426567/direct/01/>