Hello. I may indeed have got this all wrong. I only know that I was asked if
I would be willing occasionally to read submissions. I have no idea about
the role of the other people on the ed. board, nor whether people not listed
there have done or will read for the journal.
I obviously don't fully understand academic instruments. By and large in
life I am not too keen on secrecy. Anyway I apologise to everyone,
especially Robert & Scott, if they read this, for speaking out of turn.
Elizabeth
>As I said before, I’m only going by what Elizabeth James has said about
the editorial board doing the reviewing themselves. Maybe, she’s got it
wrong, and they won’t be. We just don’t know at this stage.
|