This came through OK, Rob.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rob Travis" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 10:02 PM
Subject: Re: [BRITARCH] Is there anyone there?
> For some time now, since changing to Sky for our internet provider, we
> been unable to reply to the forum, although we have still been receiving.
> Now this week we eventually managed to cobble a fix by setting up through
> google pop server, although we had to close the other account and start a
> new one in the end - so when we finally got it to accept a reply & it went
> off to a moderator, I thought it was because it was seeing us as a new
> member - pehaps that wasn't the case after all - although it doesnt seem
> be sending my replies through to the list, so perhaps the "fix" still
> If this reply does get through, perhaps you could let me know, because I
> doubt it will come through to my end (even though the priorities are set
> correct on the main list webpage.
> So when I thought the computers didn't like us this week, at least they
> also didn't like everyone else - that's some comfort anyway!
> Rob & Hilary Travis
> -----Original Message-----
> From: British archaeology discussion list
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Andrew Smith
> Sent: 18 October 2009 06:52
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [BRITARCH] Is there anyone there?
> I doubt it, Vince, but after my "But three's a crowd" message, and that
> all I said, in reply to the 'Adam and Eve' message was 'submitted to the
> moderators of the BRITARCH list.' and correspondingly delayed, I am not so
> This is the second message in a relatively short length of time, which as
> far as I could see, was relevant to the preceeding texts and completely
> innocuous messages that has been so treated; I am beginning to feel rather
> negative towards the list, and wondering if we are being moderated out of
> I tried asking for an explanation the last time but none was forthcoming.
> Mark Corney delivered a very good lecture at the Museum yesterday - I
> thought I might see you there.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Vince Russett" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 12:52 PM
> Subject: [BRITARCH] Is there anyone there?
> Afternoon, chums: is britarch still operating, or have I missed
> Vince Russett
> County Archaeologist
> Historic Environment Team
> Economy & Regeneration
> North Somerset Council
> We do not have a dedicated Record Officer and so priority will be given
> to planning-related work
> If I am out of the office, this number will transfer you to my mobile
> phone. If this is switched off, you can leave a voicemail message.
> Please notice my normal hours of work are 8am-4pm.
> Land line: 01934 426456
> Mobile: 07917 265644
> Facsimile: 01934 426605
> Please note all requests for HER data should be sent to
> [log in to unmask] . Requests will be dealt with in strict
> date order.
> Keeping in touch
> Do it online - visit our website at www.n-somerset.gov.uk
> Council Connect - for all streets, open spaces and environmental
> enquiries call 01934 888 802 or email
> [log in to unmask]
> Care Connect - for all adult social services enquiries call 01275 888 801
> email [log in to unmask]
> For all other enquiries call 01934 888 888 in office hours, or, in an
> emergency, our out of hours service 01934 622 669.
> Privacy and confidentiality notice
> The information contained in this email transmission is intended by North
> Somerset Council for the use of the named individual or entity to which it
> is directed and may contain information that is privileged or otherwise
> confidential. If you have received this email transmission in error,
> delete it from your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify
> sender of the error by reply email. Any views expressed within this
> or any other associated files are the views and expressions of the
> individual and not North Somerset Council.
> North Somerset Council takes all reasonable precautions to ensure that no
> viruses are transmitted with any electronic communications sent, however
> council can accept no responsibility for any loss or damage resulting
> directly or indirectly from the use of this email or any contents or